OK thanks for the info.
--
Joseph M. Orr, Ph.D.
Assistant Professor
Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences
Texas A Institute for Neuroscience
Texas A University
College Station, TX
On Wed, May 8, 2019 at 5:44 PM Glasser, Matthew wrote:
> We haven’t released the code for a temporal ICA
We haven’t released the code for a temporal ICA pipeline yet because we don’t
have an automated pipeline. We do hope to get the HCP-YA data cleaned with
temporal ICA and released and make an automated pipeline. For a group spatial
ICA, one needs to use MIGP. For group temporal ICA, the
Those are the observations. Perhaps Greg might have some thoughts on the
explanations.
Matt.
From: on behalf of Filip Grill
Date: Wednesday, May 8, 2019 at 8:31 AM
To: "hcp-users@humanconnectome.org"
Subject: [HCP-Users] Gambling task: clarification of Reward vs Loss being
mostly random
Is the code for performing temporal ICA denoising (Glasser et al., 2018)
available in the Pipeline repository? I didn't see anything but wanted to
make sure I didn't miss it. I was processing denoised resting state data
from 219 HCP participants in CONN, but need to re-do the analysis with the
Dear HCP users
A while ago I submitted a question regarding the gambling task to the mailing
list and it was mentioned that the contrast reward>loss did not work very well
(link to comment:
https://www.mail-archive.com/hcp-users@humanconnectome.org/msg06435.html). In
another thread regarding
