Re: [HCP-Users] "good" vs. "bad" components in ICA-FIX denoised rsfMRI data

Oh okay, still using the 500 Subjects Release data and didn’t think to look for hidden files. I see it now. Thanks to both of you! -Ely ___ HCP-Users mailing list HCP-Users@humanconnectome.org

Re: [HCP-Users] "good" vs. "bad" components in ICA-FIX denoised rsfMRI data

Hi > On 9 Mar 2016, at 15:24, Harms, Michael wrote: > > > Hi Steve, > I’m not seeing a file by that name in the HCP FIX processing. apologies - I was looking at an example folder from when we trained FIX that's the hand training output - which wasn't what was asked for

Re: [HCP-Users] "good" vs. "bad" components in ICA-FIX denoised rsfMRI data

Hi Steve, I’m not seeing a file by that name in the HCP FIX processing. In the 900 subject release data, there should be files in the rfMRI_REST?_{LR,RL}_hp2000.ica folders called Noise.txt and Signal.txt that contain the classifications.  But those files are created as part of

Re: [HCP-Users] "good" vs. "bad" components in ICA-FIX denoised rsfMRI data

Hi - it's the same as in standard FIX usage - the file listing bad components is called hand_labels_noise.txt - inside the ICA output folder. Cheers > On 9 Mar 2016, at 03:25, Ely, Benjamin wrote: > > Hi all, > > I’m interested in running some analyses (particularly

[HCP-Users] "good" vs. "bad" components in ICA-FIX denoised rsfMRI data

Hi all, I’m interested in running some analyses (particularly smoothness estimations) on the noise components identified by ICA-FIX. I’ve looked through several subjects’ ICA folders (e.g., rfMRI_REST1_LR_hp2000.ica/filtered_func_data.ica/), which contain a number of output stats and nifti