Re: [HCP-Users] A minor question regarding HCP 7T movie data

2019-06-07 Thread Harms, Michael
: Re: [HCP-Users] A minor question regarding HCP 7T movie data Thanks Keith! I am currently working with the Movie Task fMRI 2mm/32k FIX-Denoised (Compact) dataset, and I noticed the issues below: 1) Two subjects (126931 and 74) do not have MSMAll-registered time-series data. 2) Five subjects

Re: [HCP-Users] A minor question regarding HCP 7T movie data

2019-06-07 Thread Reza Rajimehr
Thanks Keith! I am currently working with the Movie Task fMRI 2mm/32k FIX-Denoised (Compact) dataset, and I noticed the issues below: 1) Two subjects (126931 and 74) do not have MSMAll-registered time-series data. 2) Five subjects (181636, 473952, 536647, 552241, and 973770) have two runs (MO

Re: [HCP-Users] A minor question regarding HCP 7T movie data

2019-06-03 Thread Keith Jamison
Hi Reza, Your interpretation of the timing is correct. The validation segment in each movie scan was shifted by 40-200ms for the "v2" version. This was done in order to make that final 83 second clip begin precisely at the start of the next TR for all 4 movie sessions. Given HRF variability, igno

[HCP-Users] A minor question regarding HCP 7T movie data

2019-05-31 Thread Reza Rajimehr
Hi, The HCP S1200 Reference Manual says that there are two versions of 4 movie files. Some subjects have been scanned with one version, and the remaining subjects have been scanned with another version. Version 2 includes these changes: 7T_MOVIE1_CC1_v2 remains unchanged. 7T_ MOVIE2_HO1_v2 remov