:19 PM
> *To: *"Harms, Michael" <mha...@wustl.edu>
> *Cc: *"Glasser, Matthew" <glass...@wustl.edu>, David Hofmann <
> davidhofma...@gmail.com>, hcp-users <hcp-users@humanconnectome.org>
>
> *Subject: *Re: [HCP-Users] Concatenating resting
l.edu>
Cc: "Glasser, Matthew" <glass...@wustl.edu>, David Hofmann
<davidhofma...@gmail.com>, hcp-users <hcp-users@humanconnectome.org>
Subject: Re: [HCP-Users] Concatenating resting state runs
When we compute parcellated connectivity, we first compute the average
ustl.edu
>
>
>
> *From: *"Glasser, Matthew" <glass...@wustl.edu>
> *Date: *Wednesday, March 7, 2018 at 3:39 PM
> *To: *David Hofmann <davidhofma...@gmail.com>
>
> *Cc: *"Harms, Michael" <mha...@wustl.edu>, hcp-users <
> hcp-users@huma
mann <davidhofma...@gmail.com>
Cc: "Harms, Michael" <mha...@wustl.edu>, hcp-users
<hcp-users@humanconnectome.org>
Subject: Re: [HCP-Users] Concatenating resting state runs
The basic idea for variance normalization is to equalize the variance of the
noise. It is very hel
PM
To: Matt Glasser <glass...@wustl.edu<mailto:glass...@wustl.edu>>
Cc: "Harms, Michael" <mha...@wustl.edu<mailto:mha...@wustl.edu>>, hcp-users
<hcp-users@humanconnectome.org<mailto:hcp-users@humanconnectome.org>>
Subject: Re: [HCP-Users] Conca
sser <glass...@wustl.edu>, David Hofmann <
> davidhofma...@gmail.com>
> Cc: hcp-users <hcp-users@humanconnectome.org>
> Subject: Re: [HCP-Users] Concatenating resting state runs
>
>
>
> Hi Matt,
>
> Right, that recipe is straightforward, but for completeness th
er <glass...@wustl.edu<mailto:glass...@wustl.edu>>, David Hofmann
<davidhofma...@gmail.com<mailto:davidhofma...@gmail.com>>
Cc: hcp-users
<hcp-users@humanconnectome.org<mailto:hcp-users@humanconnectome.org>>
Subject: Re: [HCP-Users] Concatenating resting s
...@wustl.edu>
Date: Wednesday, March 7, 2018 at 11:24 AM
To: "Harms, Michael" <mha...@wustl.edu>, David Hofmann <davidhofma...@gmail.com>
Cc: hcp-users <hcp-users@humanconnectome.org>
Subject: Re: [HCP-Users] Concatenating resting state runs
Hi Mike,
Not
lt;hcp-users@humanconnectome.org<mailto:hcp-users@humanconnectome.org>>
Subject: Re: [HCP-Users] Concatenating resting state runs
Also, if David were to do this with HCP-YA data, does he additionally need to
worry about “backing out” the bias field normalization?
--
Michael Harms, Ph.D.
---
rg<mailto:hcp-users@humanconnectome.org>>
Subject: Re: [HCP-Users] Concatenating resting state runs
Matt,
Don’t we compute an estimate of the unstructured noise variance as part of
RestingStateState, and then place that into one of the packages?
--
Michael Harms, Ph.D.
---
y, March 7, 2018 at 11:21 AM
To: "Glasser, Matthew" <glass...@wustl.edu>, David Hofmann
<davidhofma...@gmail.com>
Cc: hcp-users <hcp-users@humanconnectome.org>
Subject: Re: [HCP-Users] Concatenating resting state runs
Matt,
Don’t we compute an estimate of the unstruc
du>
Date: Wednesday, March 7, 2018 at 11:01 AM
To: David Hofmann <davidhofma...@gmail.com>
Cc: hcp-users <hcp-users@humanconnectome.org>
Subject: Re: [HCP-Users] Concatenating resting state runs
Yes they should be in that same package:
${StudyFolder}/${Subject}/MNINonLinear/Results/${fMR
that might be related to order
>> (e.g. drowsiness being higher in later scans, then order might matter).
>>
>> Peace,
>>
>> Matt.
>>
>> From: David Hofmann <davidhofma...@gmail.com>
>> Date: Wednesday, March 7, 2018 at 10:02 AM
>>
>> To:
gt;>
Date: Wednesday, March 7, 2018 at 10:47 AM
To: Matt Glasser <glass...@wustl.edu<mailto:glass...@wustl.edu>>
Cc: hcp-users
<hcp-users@humanconnectome.org<mailto:hcp-users@humanconnectome.org>>
Subject: Re: [HCP-Users] Concatenating resting state runs
Ah I underst
at 10:02 AM
>
> To: Matt Glasser <glass...@wustl.edu>
> Cc: hcp-users <hcp-users@humanconnectome.org>
> Subject: Re: [HCP-Users] Concatenating resting state runs
>
> Hey Matthew,
>
> not sure I understood where to get the unstructured noise variance from,
>
p-users@humanconnectome.org<mailto:hcp-users@humanconnectome.org>>
Subject: Re: [HCP-Users] Concatenating resting state runs
Hey Matthew,
not sure I understood where to get the unstructured noise variance from, i.e.
is it even possible to apply this to the FIX extended datasets?
I thought
...@wustl.edu>>
Cc: hcp-users
<hcp-users@humanconnectome.org<mailto:hcp-users@humanconnectome.org>>
Subject: Re: [HCP-Users] Concatenating resting state runs
Hi Matthew,
ok, so temporal filtering separately for each run. Any comments on
concatenation and z-standardization?
> Matt.
>
> From: <hcp-users-boun...@humanconnectome.org> on behalf of David Hofmann <
> davidhofma...@gmail.com>
> Date: Wednesday, March 7, 2018 at 2:32 AM
> To: hcp-users <hcp-users@humanconnectome.org>
> Subject: [HCP-Users] Concatenating resting state runs
&g
;mailto:davidhofma...@gmail.com>>
Date: Wednesday, March 7, 2018 at 2:32 AM
To: hcp-users
<hcp-users@humanconnectome.org<mailto:hcp-users@humanconnectome.org>>
Subject: [HCP-Users] Concatenating resting state runs
Hi all,
for a later analysis where I extract ROIs with SPM, I need to
Hi all,
for a later analysis where I extract ROIs with SPM, I need to concatenate
the resting state runs and want to make sure I'm doing it correctly. SPM
extracts the first eigenvariate of a ROI, i.e. the component that explains
the most variance.
I'm using the* Resting State fMRI 1
20 matches
Mail list logo
