@humanconnectome.org>"
<hcp-users@humanconnectome.org<mailto:hcp-users@humanconnectome.org>>
Subject: Re: [HCP-Users] Statistical comparison of whole brain (surface
"voxels" + subcortical / cerebellar voxels) connectivity between two explicitly
defined vo
Mike
>
>
>
> Michael F. Regner, M.D.
>
> Departments of Radiology and Bioengineering
>
> University of Colorado – Denver
>
> E-mail: michael.reg...@ucdenver.edu
>
>
>
> *From:* Glasser, Matthew [mailto:glass...@wustl.edu]
> *Sent:* Monday, July 10, 2017 8:15
...@ucdenver.edu<mailto:michael.reg...@ucdenver.edu>
From: Glasser, Matthew [mailto:glass...@wustl.edu]
Sent: Monday, July 10, 2017 8:15 PM
To: Regner, Michael <michael.reg...@ucdenver.edu>; hcp-users@humanconnectome.org
Subject: Re: [HCP-Users] Statistical comparison of whole brain (surfac
Connectome Workbench currently does not have tools designed for doing
statistical inference. PALM is what we recommend, and it has support for
CIFTI files.
You can also use wb_command -cifti-convert -to-nifti to feed CIFTI data
into FSL tools, if they don't use spatial information. Note that
Dear HCP Community,
I am relatively new to the HCP data and Connectome Workbench. Our
neuroradiology laboratory at the University of Colorado is beginning to use it.
It has already proved to be extremely helpful in aiding the interpretation of
existing resting state results.
My question is:
