Tel: 314-747-6173
>> <(314)%20747-6173>
>>
>> St. Louis, MO 63110 Email:
>> mha...@wustl.edu
>>
>>
>>
>> *From: * on behalf of "Glasser,
>> Matthew"
>> *Date: *Friday,
ms, Michael" mailto:mha...@wustl.edu>>, Matt Glasser
mailto:glass...@wustl.edu>>,
"hcp-users@humanconnectome.org<mailto:hcp-users@humanconnectome.org>"
mailto:hcp-users@humanconnectome.org>>
Subject: Re: [HCP-Users] Offline vs. online gradient nonlinearity correct
ate: *Friday, August 4, 2017 at 1:21 PM
> *To: *Sandhitsu Das , "hcp-users@humanconnectome.org"
>
> *Subject: *Re: [HCP-Users] Offline vs. online gradient nonlinearity
> correction
>
>
>
>1. Yes
>2. We use dcm2nii.
>3. Probably
>
> I would us
"hcp-users@humanconnectome.org"
Subject: Re: [HCP-Users] Offline vs. online gradient nonlinearity correction
1. Yes
2. We use dcm2nii.
3. Probably
I would use offline so you are sure that all of your images are being corrected
the same way and have control over how the resamplin
1. Yes
2. We use dcm2nii.
3. Probably
I would use offline so you are sure that all of your images are being corrected
the same way and have control over how the resampling is being done (i.e. not
adding blurring from trilinear interpolation).
Peace,
Matt.
From:
mailto:hcp-users-boun
