We are down to 4 blockers and looks like they are all actively being worked
on. Please reconsider marking new JIRAs as blockers.
Thanks
Karthik
PS: I moved out a couple of JIRAs that didn't seem like true blockers to
2.6.
On Wed, Jul 9, 2014 at 11:43 AM, Karthik Kambatla ka...@cloudera.com
, Karthik Kambatla ka...@cloudera.com
wrote:
I just
1. moved non-blocker 2.5 JIRAs to 2.6.
2. created branch-2.5 and added sections for 2.6.0 in all CHANGES.txt in
trunk and branch-2.
3. Will create branch-2.5.0 when we are ready to create an RC
There are 11 pending blockers for 2.5.0: http
caution when merging to branch-2.5 and target
non-blockers preferably to 2.6
On Wed, Jul 2, 2014 at 10:24 PM, Karthik Kambatla ka...@cloudera.com
wrote:
Committers,
I am working on branching 2.5. Will send an update as soon as I am done
branching.
Committers,
I am working on branching 2.5. Will send an update as soon as I am done
branching.
I was trying to do a JIRA bulk update to target all non-blockers to 2.6,
but doesn't look like the bulk-update tool doesn't have Target Version.
Does anyone know if that is true or if it is me not having permissions?
On Thu, Jun 26, 2014 at 12:08 AM, Karthik Kambatla ka...@cloudera.com
wrote
As someone else already mentioned, we should announce one future release
(may be, 2.5) as the last JDK6-based release before making the move to JDK7.
I am comfortable calling 2.5 the last JDK6 release.
On Fri, Jun 27, 2014 at 11:26 AM, Andrew Wang andrew.w...@cloudera.com
wrote:
Hi all,
till that point of time.
I am also pushing for Shared Cache: YARN-1492 reviews. Again, like I said
before, we can take it as we go.
+Vinod
Hortonworks Inc.
http://hortonworks.com/
On Thu, Jun 26, 2014 at 12:08 AM, Karthik Kambatla ka...@cloudera.com
wrote:
Hi folks,
For 2.5, looks
JDK6 release and solicit their feedback. Once they
are comfortable we can pull the trigger in 2.7.
thanks,
Arun
On Jun 27, 2014, at 11:34 AM, Karthik Kambatla ka...@cloudera.com
wrote:
As someone else already mentioned, we should announce one future release
(may be, 2.5) as the last
Spoke to Vinod offline. The tentative plan is cut branch-2.5 middle of next
week and work towards getting the remaining blockers in as soon as
possible.
On Fri, Jun 27, 2014 at 12:56 PM, Karthik Kambatla ka...@cloudera.com
wrote:
Including YARN-1695 makes sense, just made it a blocker
23, 2014, at 2:09 PM, Karthik Kambatla ka...@cloudera.com
wrote:
I can pick up the RM duties for 2.5. If I run into any HDFS doubts, I
might
need some help from someone more familiar with HDFS.
On Mon, Jun 23, 2014 at 12:07 PM, Arun C Murthy a...@hortonworks.com
wrote:
Folks
+1 (non-binding)
Stood up a pseudo-dist cluster and ran a few MR jobs.
On Wed, Jun 25, 2014 at 9:05 AM, Jason Lowe jl...@yahoo-inc.com.invalid
wrote:
+1 (binding)
- Verified signatures and digests
- Deployed binary tarball to a single-node cluster and ran some MR example
jobs
- Built
I can pick up the RM duties for 2.5. If I run into any HDFS doubts, I might
need some help from someone more familiar with HDFS.
On Mon, Jun 23, 2014 at 12:07 PM, Arun C Murthy a...@hortonworks.com wrote:
Folks,
I'd appreciate some help here. Due to family reasons (all good ones),
I'll be
PM, Karthik Kambatla ka...@cloudera.com
wrote:
I can pick up the RM duties for 2.5. If I run into any HDFS doubts, I
might
need some help from someone more familiar with HDFS.
On Mon, Jun 23, 2014 at 12:07 PM, Arun C Murthy a...@hortonworks.com
wrote:
Folks,
I'd
Karthik Kambatla created HDFS-5082:
--
Summary: Move the version info of zookeeper test dependency to
hadoop-project/pom
Key: HDFS-5082
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-5082
Project
Karthik Kambatla created HDFS-5033:
--
Summary: Bad error message for fs -put/copyFromLocal if user
doesn't have permissions to read the source
Key: HDFS-5033
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-5033
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-4009?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Karthik Kambatla reopened HDFS-4009:
Owen,
Re-opening the JIRA, because the original issue still remains that these
FileSystems do
101 - 116 of 116 matches
Mail list logo
