With 3 +1s, the vote passes. Thanks, all.
best,
Colin
On Fri, Oct 25, 2013 at 4:01 PM, Colin McCabe cmcc...@alumni.cmu.edu wrote:
On Fri, Oct 25, 2013 at 10:07 AM, Suresh Srinivas
sur...@hortonworks.com wrote:
I posted a comment in the other thread about feature branch merges.
My
Are there any other things we should do today prior to merging?
Can we get the user documentation done soon (HDFS-5386)? I've given a
round of feedback. If it helps, I can volunteer to upload a new patch that
incorporates my feedback.
Chris Nauroth
Hortonworks
http://hortonworks.com/
On
I posted a comment in the other thread about feature branch merges.
My preference is to make sure the requirements we have for regular patches
be applied to feature branch patch as well (3 +1s is the only exception).
Also
adding details about what functionality is missing (I posted a comment on
Hello all,
I'd like to call a vote to merge the HDFS-4949 branch (in-memory caching)
to trunk. Colin McCabe and I have been hard at work the last 3.5 months
implementing this feature, and feel that it's reached a level of stability
and utility where it's ready for broader testing and integration.
+1. Thanks, guys.
best,
Colin
On Thu, Oct 17, 2013 at 3:01 PM, Andrew Wang andrew.w...@cloudera.com wrote:
Hello all,
I'd like to call a vote to merge the HDFS-4949 branch (in-memory caching)
to trunk. Colin McCabe and I have been hard at work the last 3.5 months
implementing this feature,
