Re: Long time fail over when using QJM

2013-08-29 Thread Mickey
Sorry for the empty mail. Thanks, Todd. In the test my HBase doesn't work for a long time. Maybe there's something wrong in my HBase.I will try to do more tests. Thanks, Mickey 2013/8/30 Mickey > > > > 2013/8/30 Todd Lipcon > >> If you're seeing those log messages, the SBN was already active

Re: Long time fail over when using QJM

2013-08-29 Thread Mickey
2013/8/30 Todd Lipcon > If you're seeing those log messages, the SBN was already active at that > time. It only logs that message when successfully writing transactions. So, > the failover must have already completed before the logs you're looking at. > > -Todd > > On Thu, Aug 29, 2013 at 1:18 AM

Re: Long time fail over when using QJM

2013-08-29 Thread Todd Lipcon
If you're seeing those log messages, the SBN was already active at that time. It only logs that message when successfully writing transactions. So, the failover must have already completed before the logs you're looking at. -Todd On Thu, Aug 29, 2013 at 1:18 AM, Mickey wrote: > Hi, all > I trie

Long time fail over when using QJM

2013-08-29 Thread Mickey
Hi, all I tried to test the QJM HA and it always works good. But, yestoday I met an quite long time fail over with QJM. The test is base on the CDH4.3.0. The attachment is the standby namenode and the journalnode 's logs. The network cable on active namenode(also a datanode) was pulled out at about