ozone, and then ozone was merged back.
> >>
> >> Here is the mail that we followed for the merge process.
> >> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/43cd65c6b6c3c0e8ac
> >>
> >> Thanks
> >> Xiaoyu
> >>
> >>
>
ed for the merge process.
>> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/43cd65c6b6c3c0e8ac
>>
>> Thanks
>> Xiaoyu
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> *From: *Owen O'Malley <owen.omal...@gmail.com>
>> *Date: *Wednesd
pache.org/thread.html/43cd65c6b6c3c0e8ac
>>
>> Thanks
>> Xiaoyu
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> *From: *Owen O'Malley <owen.omal...@gmail.com>
>> *Date: *Wednesday, April 25, 2018 at 11:15 AM
>> *T
8ac
>>
>> Thanks
>> Xiaoyu
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> *From: *Owen O'Malley <owen.omal...@gmail.com>
>> *Date: *Wednesday, April 25, 2018 at 11:15 AM
>> *To: *Chris Douglas <cdoug...@apache.org>
>> *Cc: *Xiaoyu Yao
nworks.com>, Jitendra Pandey <
> jiten...@hortonworks.com>, Hdfs-dev <hdfs-dev@hadoop.apache.org>
> *Subject: *Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Merge HDDS (HDFS-7240) *code* into trunk
>
>
>
> *sigh*
>
>
>
> I asked you guys to rebase this before merge. It is tempti
dra Pandey
<jiten...@hortonworks.com>, Hdfs-dev <hdfs-dev@hadoop.apache.org>
Subject: Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Merge HDDS (HDFS-7240) *code* into trunk
*sigh*
I asked you guys to rebase this before merge. It is tempting to squash it into
a single commit.
.. Owen
On Wed, Apr 25, 2018 at 1
*sigh*
I asked you guys to rebase this before merge. It is tempting to squash it
into a single commit.
.. Owen
On Wed, Apr 25, 2018 at 11:06 AM, Chris Douglas wrote:
> This really made a mess of trunk. Periodically merging trunk into the
> HDFS-7240 branch, then merging
This really made a mess of trunk. Periodically merging trunk into the
HDFS-7240 branch, then merging the whole thing back, created a tangle
of references that's very difficult to work with (look at the output
of git log --graph).
I'm not sure it's even possible to fix this, but this is why
I just merged the branch to trunk (834 commits in total)
Again, thanks for all who contributed to HDDS/Ozone!
Cheers
-Xiaoyu
On 4/23/18, 7:26 PM, "Jitendra Pandey" wrote:
The vote passes with many +1s (12 committers + 5 contributors) and no -1.
Thanks