[jira] [Resolved] (HDFS-2993) HA: BackupNode#checkOperation should permit CHECKPOINT operations

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-2993?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Eli Collins resolved HDFS-2993. --- Resolution: Fixed Hadoop Flags: Reviewed I've committed this. Thanks for the review Todd.

[jira] [Created] (HDFS-2997) Expose status of DNs from the NN programmatically

Expose status of DNs from the NN programmatically - Key: HDFS-2997 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-2997 Project: Hadoop HDFS Issue Type: New Feature Components:

[jira] [Created] (HDFS-2998) OfflineImageViewer and ImageVisitor should be annotated public

OfflineImageViewer and ImageVisitor should be annotated public -- Key: HDFS-2998 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-2998 Project: Hadoop HDFS Issue Type: New Feature

[jira] [Created] (HDFS-2999) DN metrics should include per-disk utilization

DN metrics should include per-disk utilization -- Key: HDFS-2999 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-2999 Project: Hadoop HDFS Issue Type: Improvement Components: data-node

[jira] [Created] (HDFS-3002) TestNameNodeMetrics need not wait for metrics update with new metrics framework

TestNameNodeMetrics need not wait for metrics update with new metrics framework --- Key: HDFS-3002 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-3002 Project: Hadoop HDFS

[jira] [Resolved] (HDFS-2997) Expose status of DNs from the NN programmatically

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-2997?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Aaron T. Myers resolved HDFS-2997. -- Resolution: Not A Problem Target Version/s: (was: 0.23.2) My mistake, Suresh. This

Re: Merging the HA branch to trunk - Wednesday, February 29th

I am not sure any of these issues are serious show stoppers for merging into trunk. Why not merge into trunk and fix some of these issues? The reason is, merging is non trivial with two branches changing independently. Given that Jitendra has posted a merge patch, why not do it earlier? Do we

Re: Merging the HA branch to trunk - Wednesday, February 29th

On Thu, Feb 23, 2012 at 10:23 AM, Suresh Srinivas sur...@hortonworks.com wrote: I am not sure any of these issues are serious show stoppers for merging into trunk. Why not merge into trunk and fix some of these issues? The reason is, merging is non trivial with two branches changing

[jira] [Created] (HDFS-3003) DFSUtil is a better palce for method getHostPortString() than NameNode

DFSUtil is a better palce for method getHostPortString() than NameNode -- Key: HDFS-3003 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-3003 Project: Hadoop HDFS Issue

[jira] [Created] (HDFS-3004) Create Offline NameNode recovery tool

Create Offline NameNode recovery tool - Key: HDFS-3004 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-3004 Project: Hadoop HDFS Issue Type: New Feature Components: tools Reporter:

[jira] [Resolved] (HDFS-2971) some improvements to the manual NN metadata recovery tools

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-2971?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Colin Patrick McCabe resolved HDFS-2971. Resolution: Won't Fix See previous comment. some improvements to

[jira] [Created] (HDFS-3005) ConcurrentModificationException in FSDataset$FSVolume.getDfsUsed(..)

ConcurrentModificationException in FSDataset$FSVolume.getDfsUsed(..) Key: HDFS-3005 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-3005 Project: Hadoop HDFS Issue Type:

Re: Merging the HA branch to trunk - Wednesday, February 29th

Hi folks, I had the chance today to run some performance benchmarks on one of Cloudera's 100 node test clusters. I've posted the results to the JIRA, but the summary is that I think we need to do a bit more optimization of the persistBlocks edit log entries before we merge. That said, I think