[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-9231?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Xiao Chen updated HDFS-9231:
Attachment: HDFS-9231.008.patch
> fsck doesn't explicitly list when Bad Replicas/Blocks are in a snapshot
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-9303?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Lin Yiqun updated HDFS-9303:
Status: Patch Available (was: Open)
The solution of this problem is to limit the small source blocks and
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-9303?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=14972605#comment-14972605
]
Hadoop QA commented on HDFS-9303:
-
\\
\\
| (x) *{color:red}-1 overall{color}* |
\\
\\
|| Vote || Subsystem
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-9303?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=14972619#comment-14972619
]
Tsz Wo Nicholas Sze commented on HDFS-9303:
---
Is this a duplicate of HDFS-8824?
> Balancer slowly
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-9303?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Lin Yiqun updated HDFS-9303:
Attachment: HDFS-9303.001.patch
Add a new param blockBytesNum to limit the source block size.And update some
Lin Yiqun created HDFS-9303:
---
Summary: Balancer slowly with too many small file blocks
Key: HDFS-9303
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-9303
Project: Hadoop HDFS
Issue Type:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-9231?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=14972793#comment-14972793
]
Xiao Chen commented on HDFS-9231:
-
Patch 08 addresses checkstyle errors.
The test failure is unrelate and
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-9289?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=14972655#comment-14972655
]
Chang Li commented on HDFS-9289:
Hi [~zhz], here is the log,
{code}
INFO hdfs.StateChange: BLOCK*
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-9231?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=14972834#comment-14972834
]
Hadoop QA commented on HDFS-9231:
-
\\
\\
| (x) *{color:red}-1 overall{color}* |
\\
\\
|| Vote || Subsystem
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-9077?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
HeeSoo Kim updated HDFS-9077:
-
Attachment: HDFS-9077.003.patch
> webhdfs client requires SPNEGO to do renew
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-9077?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=14972888#comment-14972888
]
Hadoop QA commented on HDFS-9077:
-
\\
\\
| (x) *{color:red}-1 overall{color}* |
\\
\\
|| Vote || Subsystem
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-9302?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=14973001#comment-14973001
]
Yi Liu commented on HDFS-9302:
--
[~Karthik Palaniappan], thanks for reporting this, it's better to return a
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-9259?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Mingliang Liu updated HDFS-9259:
Attachment: HDFS-9259.000.patch
The v0 patch is the first effort to address this issue, which:
-
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-9259?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Mingliang Liu updated HDFS-9259:
Status: Patch Available (was: Open)
> Make SO_SNDBUF size configurable at DFSClient side for hdfs
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-9245?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=14973035#comment-14973035
]
Hadoop QA commented on HDFS-9245:
-
\\
\\
| (x) *{color:red}-1 overall{color}* |
\\
\\
|| Vote || Subsystem
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-9245?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Mingliang Liu updated HDFS-9245:
Attachment: HDFS-9245.001.patch
Per offline discussion with[~wheat9] and [~gtCarrera9], the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-9079?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=14972482#comment-14972482
]
Tsz Wo Nicholas Sze commented on HDFS-9079:
---
> More details of the proposed protocol can be found
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-9129?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Mingliang Liu updated HDFS-9129:
Attachment: HDFS-9129.010.patch
Thank you [~wheat9] for your review. The v10 patch addresses the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-4015?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=14972437#comment-14972437
]
Hudson commented on HDFS-4015:
--
FAILURE: Integrated in Hadoop-Hdfs-trunk #2468 (See
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-9301?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=14972438#comment-14972438
]
Hudson commented on HDFS-9301:
--
FAILURE: Integrated in Hadoop-Hdfs-trunk #2468 (See
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-9290?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=14972436#comment-14972436
]
Hudson commented on HDFS-9290:
--
FAILURE: Integrated in Hadoop-Hdfs-trunk #2468 (See
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-9297?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=14972439#comment-14972439
]
Hudson commented on HDFS-9297:
--
FAILURE: Integrated in Hadoop-Hdfs-trunk #2468 (See
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-9129?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=14972490#comment-14972490
]
Hadoop QA commented on HDFS-9129:
-
\\
\\
| (x) *{color:red}-1 overall{color}* |
\\
\\
|| Vote || Subsystem
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-9228?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=14972430#comment-14972430
]
Rohan Rajeevan commented on HDFS-9228:
--
Agree with [~arpitagarwal] here.
I think the default value
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-8831?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=14972479#comment-14972479
]
Hadoop QA commented on HDFS-8831:
-
\\
\\
| (x) *{color:red}-1 overall{color}* |
\\
\\
|| Vote || Subsystem
25 matches
Mail list logo