[jira] [Commented] (HDFS-15442) Image upload may fail if dfs.image.transfer.chunksize wrongly set to negative value

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-15442?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17164728#comment-17164728 ] Hadoop QA commented on HDFS-15442: -- | (x) *{color:red}-1 overall{color}* | \\ \\ || Vote || Subsystem ||

[jira] [Comment Edited] (HDFS-15442) Image upload may fail if dfs.image.transfer.chunksize wrongly set to negative value

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-15442?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17164724#comment-17164724 ] AMC-team edited comment on HDFS-15442 at 7/25/20, 3:05 AM: --- upload a patch to

[jira] [Commented] (HDFS-15442) Image upload may fail if dfs.image.transfer.chunksize wrongly set to negative value

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-15442?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17164724#comment-17164724 ] AMC-team commented on HDFS-15442: - upload a patch to fall back the invalid chunksize value to default >

[jira] [Updated] (HDFS-15442) Image upload may fail if dfs.image.transfer.chunksize wrongly set to negative value

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-15442?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] AMC-team updated HDFS-15442: Attachment: (was: HDFS-15442.000.patch) > Image upload may fail if dfs.image.transfer.chunksize

[jira] [Updated] (HDFS-15442) Image upload may fail if dfs.image.transfer.chunksize wrongly set to negative value

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-15442?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] AMC-team updated HDFS-15442: Attachment: HDFS-15442.000.patch Status: Patch Available (was: Open) > Image upload may fail if

[jira] [Updated] (HDFS-15442) Image upload may fail if dfs.image.transfer.chunksize wrongly set to negative value

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-15442?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] AMC-team updated HDFS-15442: Attachment: HDFS-15442.000.patch > Image upload may fail if dfs.image.transfer.chunksize wrongly set to

[jira] [Commented] (HDFS-15440) The usage of dfs.disk.balancer.block.tolerance.percent is not intuitive.

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-15440?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17164723#comment-17164723 ] Hadoop QA commented on HDFS-15440: -- | (x) *{color:red}-1 overall{color}* | \\ \\ || Vote || Subsystem ||

[jira] [Commented] (HDFS-15440) The usage of dfs.disk.balancer.block.tolerance.percent is not intuitive.

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-15440?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17164721#comment-17164721 ] AMC-team commented on HDFS-15440: - upload a patch to change the current logic and refine parameter check

[jira] [Updated] (HDFS-15440) The usage of dfs.disk.balancer.block.tolerance.percent is not intuitive.

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-15440?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] AMC-team updated HDFS-15440: Attachment: HDFS-15440.000.patch Status: Patch Available (was: Open) > The usage of

[jira] [Updated] (HDFS-15440) The usage of dfs.disk.balancer.block.tolerance.percent is not intuitive.

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-15440?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] AMC-team updated HDFS-15440: Description: In HDFS disk balancer, configuration parameter "dfs.disk.balancer.block.tolerance.percent"

[jira] [Updated] (HDFS-15440) The usage of dfs.disk.balancer.block.tolerance.percent is not intuitive.

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-15440?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] AMC-team updated HDFS-15440: Summary: The usage of dfs.disk.balancer.block.tolerance.percent is not intuitive.(was: The doc of

[jira] [Comment Edited] (HDFS-15443) Setting dfs.datanode.max.transfer.threads to a very small value can cause strange failure.

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-15443?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17164706#comment-17164706 ] AMC-team edited comment on HDFS-15443 at 7/25/20, 1:52 AM: --- Thanks [~ayushtkn] 

[jira] [Commented] (HDFS-15098) Add SM4 encryption method for HDFS

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-15098?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17164715#comment-17164715 ] Hadoop QA commented on HDFS-15098: -- | (x) *{color:red}-1 overall{color}* | \\ \\ || Vote || Subsystem ||

[jira] [Commented] (HDFS-15438) Setting dfs.disk.balancer.max.disk.errors = 0 will fail the block copy

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-15438?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17164714#comment-17164714 ] Hadoop QA commented on HDFS-15438: -- | (x) *{color:red}-1 overall{color}* | \\ \\ || Vote || Subsystem ||

[jira] [Commented] (HDFS-15438) Setting dfs.disk.balancer.max.disk.errors = 0 will fail the block copy

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-15438?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17164713#comment-17164713 ] AMC-team commented on HDFS-15438: - Thanks [~ayushtkn] for the feedback. I upload a patch to change the

[jira] [Updated] (HDFS-15438) Setting dfs.disk.balancer.max.disk.errors = 0 will fail the block copy

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-15438?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] AMC-team updated HDFS-15438: Attachment: HDFS-15438.001.patch > Setting dfs.disk.balancer.max.disk.errors = 0 will fail the block copy

[jira] [Commented] (HDFS-15439) Setting dfs.mover.retry.max.attempts to negative value will retry forever.

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-15439?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17164711#comment-17164711 ] Hadoop QA commented on HDFS-15439: -- | (x) *{color:red}-1 overall{color}* | \\ \\ || Vote || Subsystem ||

[jira] [Updated] (HDFS-15098) Add SM4 encryption method for HDFS

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-15098?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] liusheng updated HDFS-15098: Attachment: HDFS-15098.009.patch Status: Patch Available (was: Open) > Add SM4 encryption method

[jira] [Updated] (HDFS-15098) Add SM4 encryption method for HDFS

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-15098?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] liusheng updated HDFS-15098: Attachment: (was: HDFS-15098.009.patch) > Add SM4 encryption method for HDFS >

[jira] [Updated] (HDFS-15098) Add SM4 encryption method for HDFS

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-15098?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] liusheng updated HDFS-15098: Status: Open (was: Patch Available) > Add SM4 encryption method for HDFS >

[jira] [Commented] (HDFS-15439) Setting dfs.mover.retry.max.attempts to negative value will retry forever.

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-15439?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17164710#comment-17164710 ] AMC-team commented on HDFS-15439: - Upload a patch based on [~ayushtkn]'s suggestion. Thanks! > Setting

[jira] [Updated] (HDFS-15439) Setting dfs.mover.retry.max.attempts to negative value will retry forever.

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-15439?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] AMC-team updated HDFS-15439: Attachment: HDFS-15439.001.patch > Setting dfs.mover.retry.max.attempts to negative value will retry

[jira] [Commented] (HDFS-15443) Setting dfs.datanode.max.transfer.threads to a very small value can cause strange failure.

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-15443?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17164706#comment-17164706 ] AMC-team commented on HDFS-15443: - Thanks [~ayushtkn] for the great feedback. I refined the patch  

[jira] [Commented] (HDFS-15443) Setting dfs.datanode.max.transfer.threads to a very small value can cause strange failure.

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-15443?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17164707#comment-17164707 ] Hadoop QA commented on HDFS-15443: -- | (x) *{color:red}-1 overall{color}* | \\ \\ || Vote || Subsystem ||

[jira] [Updated] (HDFS-15443) Setting dfs.datanode.max.transfer.threads to a very small value can cause strange failure.

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-15443?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] AMC-team updated HDFS-15443: Attachment: HDFS-15443.003.patch > Setting dfs.datanode.max.transfer.threads to a very small value can

[jira] [Commented] (HDFS-15443) Setting dfs.datanode.max.transfer.threads to a very small value can cause strange failure.

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-15443?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17164698#comment-17164698 ] Hadoop QA commented on HDFS-15443: -- | (x) *{color:red}-1 overall{color}* | \\ \\ || Vote || Subsystem ||

[jira] [Updated] (HDFS-15443) Setting dfs.datanode.max.transfer.threads to a very small value can cause strange failure.

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-15443?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] AMC-team updated HDFS-15443: Attachment: (was: HDFS-15443.003.patch) > Setting dfs.datanode.max.transfer.threads to a very small

[jira] [Updated] (HDFS-15443) Setting dfs.datanode.max.transfer.threads to a very small value can cause strange failure.

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-15443?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] AMC-team updated HDFS-15443: Attachment: HDFS-15443.003.patch > Setting dfs.datanode.max.transfer.threads to a very small value can

[jira] [Issue Comment Deleted] (HDFS-15438) Setting dfs.disk.balancer.max.disk.errors = 0 will fail the block copy

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-15438?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] AMC-team updated HDFS-15438: Comment: was deleted (was: I upload a new patch based on [~ayushtkn]'s suggestion. IMHO, the current

[jira] [Issue Comment Deleted] (HDFS-15443) Setting dfs.datanode.max.transfer.threads to a very small value can cause strange failure.

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-15443?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] AMC-team updated HDFS-15443: Comment: was deleted (was: Thanks [~ayushtkn] for the great feedback. I refined the patch (change

[jira] [Issue Comment Deleted] (HDFS-15439) Setting dfs.mover.retry.max.attempts to negative value will retry forever.

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-15439?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] AMC-team updated HDFS-15439: Comment: was deleted (was: upload a new patch based on [~ayushtkn]' feedback) > Setting

[jira] [Updated] (HDFS-15438) Setting dfs.disk.balancer.max.disk.errors = 0 will fail the block copy

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-15438?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] AMC-team updated HDFS-15438: Attachment: (was: HDFS-15438.001.patch) > Setting dfs.disk.balancer.max.disk.errors = 0 will fail the

[jira] [Updated] (HDFS-15439) Setting dfs.mover.retry.max.attempts to negative value will retry forever.

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-15439?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] AMC-team updated HDFS-15439: Attachment: (was: HDFS-15439.001.patch) > Setting dfs.mover.retry.max.attempts to negative value will

[jira] [Updated] (HDFS-15443) Setting dfs.datanode.max.transfer.threads to a very small value can cause strange failure.

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-15443?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] AMC-team updated HDFS-15443: Attachment: (was: HDFS-15443.003.patch) > Setting dfs.datanode.max.transfer.threads to a very small

[jira] [Commented] (HDFS-15438) Setting dfs.disk.balancer.max.disk.errors = 0 will fail the block copy

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-15438?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17164690#comment-17164690 ] AMC-team commented on HDFS-15438: - I upload a new patch based on [~ayushtkn]'s suggestion. IMHO, the

[jira] [Commented] (HDFS-15438) Setting dfs.disk.balancer.max.disk.errors = 0 will fail the block copy

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-15438?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17164689#comment-17164689 ] Hadoop QA commented on HDFS-15438: -- | (x) *{color:red}-1 overall{color}* | \\ \\ || Vote || Subsystem ||

[jira] [Updated] (HDFS-15438) Setting dfs.disk.balancer.max.disk.errors = 0 will fail the block copy

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-15438?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] AMC-team updated HDFS-15438: Attachment: HDFS-15438.001.patch > Setting dfs.disk.balancer.max.disk.errors = 0 will fail the block copy

[jira] [Commented] (HDFS-15439) Setting dfs.mover.retry.max.attempts to negative value will retry forever.

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-15439?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17164688#comment-17164688 ] Hadoop QA commented on HDFS-15439: -- | (x) *{color:red}-1 overall{color}* | \\ \\ || Vote || Subsystem ||

[jira] [Commented] (HDFS-15439) Setting dfs.mover.retry.max.attempts to negative value will retry forever.

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-15439?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17164684#comment-17164684 ] AMC-team commented on HDFS-15439: - upload a new patch based on [~ayushtkn]' feedback > Setting

[jira] [Updated] (HDFS-15439) Setting dfs.mover.retry.max.attempts to negative value will retry forever.

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-15439?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] AMC-team updated HDFS-15439: Attachment: HDFS-15439.001.patch > Setting dfs.mover.retry.max.attempts to negative value will retry

[jira] [Commented] (HDFS-15443) Setting dfs.datanode.max.transfer.threads to a very small value can cause strange failure.

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-15443?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17164680#comment-17164680 ] Hadoop QA commented on HDFS-15443: -- | (x) *{color:red}-1 overall{color}* | \\ \\ || Vote || Subsystem ||

[jira] [Commented] (HDFS-15443) Setting dfs.datanode.max.transfer.threads to a very small value can cause strange failure.

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-15443?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17164678#comment-17164678 ] Hadoop QA commented on HDFS-15443: -- | (x) *{color:red}-1 overall{color}* | \\ \\ || Vote || Subsystem ||

[jira] [Comment Edited] (HDFS-15443) Setting dfs.datanode.max.transfer.threads to a very small value can cause strange failure.

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-15443?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17164677#comment-17164677 ] AMC-team edited comment on HDFS-15443 at 7/24/20, 11:34 PM: Thanks

[jira] [Commented] (HDFS-15443) Setting dfs.datanode.max.transfer.threads to a very small value can cause strange failure.

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-15443?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17164677#comment-17164677 ] AMC-team commented on HDFS-15443: - Thanks [~ayushtkn] for the great feedback. I refined the patch

[jira] [Updated] (HDFS-15443) Setting dfs.datanode.max.transfer.threads to a very small value can cause strange failure.

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-15443?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] AMC-team updated HDFS-15443: Attachment: HDFS-15443.003.patch > Setting dfs.datanode.max.transfer.threads to a very small value can

[jira] [Updated] (HDFS-15443) Setting dfs.datanode.max.transfer.threads to a very small value can cause strange failure.

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-15443?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] AMC-team updated HDFS-15443: Attachment: (was: HDFS-15443.003.patch) > Setting dfs.datanode.max.transfer.threads to a very small

[jira] [Updated] (HDFS-15443) Setting dfs.datanode.max.transfer.threads to a very small value can cause strange failure.

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-15443?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] AMC-team updated HDFS-15443: Attachment: HDFS-15443.003.patch > Setting dfs.datanode.max.transfer.threads to a very small value can

[jira] [Commented] (HDFS-15493) Update block map and name cache in parallel while loading fsimage.

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-15493?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17164356#comment-17164356 ] Chengwei Wang commented on HDFS-15493: -- Thanks Stephen O'Donnell for your info about HDFS-13693, I

[jira] [Commented] (HDFS-15443) Setting dfs.datanode.max.transfer.threads to a very small value can cause strange failure.

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-15443?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17164350#comment-17164350 ] Ayush Saxena commented on HDFS-15443: - In such a case there is only two solutions, first is as soon

[jira] [Commented] (HDFS-15098) Add SM4 encryption method for HDFS

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-15098?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17164346#comment-17164346 ] Hadoop QA commented on HDFS-15098: -- | (x) *{color:red}-1 overall{color}* | \\ \\ || Vote || Subsystem ||

[jira] [Commented] (HDFS-15493) Update block map and name cache in parallel while loading fsimage.

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-15493?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17164336#comment-17164336 ] Stephen O'Donnell commented on HDFS-15493: -- This looks like another good speed improvement. I

[jira] [Comment Edited] (HDFS-15493) Update block map and name cache in parallel while loading fsimage.

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-15493?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17164307#comment-17164307 ] Chengwei Wang edited comment on HDFS-15493 at 7/24/20, 10:03 AM: - submit

[jira] [Commented] (HDFS-15098) Add SM4 encryption method for HDFS

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-15098?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17164316#comment-17164316 ] liusheng commented on HDFS-15098: - Hi [~lindongdong], Sorry, what do you mean about "for this two old

[jira] [Updated] (HDFS-15493) Update block map and name cache in parallel while loading fsimage.

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-15493?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Chengwei Wang updated HDFS-15493: - External issue ID: HDFS-14617 > Update block map and name cache in parallel while loading

[jira] [Updated] (HDFS-15493) Update block map and name cache in parallel while loading fsimage.

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-15493?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Chengwei Wang updated HDFS-15493: - External issue ID: (was: HDFS-14617) > Update block map and name cache in parallel while

[jira] [Commented] (HDFS-15493) Update block map and name cache in parallel while loading fsimage.

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-15493?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17164312#comment-17164312 ] Hadoop QA commented on HDFS-15493: -- | (x) *{color:red}-1 overall{color}* | \\ \\ || Vote || Subsystem ||

[jira] [Updated] (HDFS-15493) Update block map and name cache in parallel while loading fsimage.

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-15493?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Chengwei Wang updated HDFS-15493: - Description: While loading INodeDirectorySection of fsimage, it will update name cache and

[jira] [Commented] (HDFS-15493) Update block map and name cache in parallel while loading fsimage.

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-15493?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17164307#comment-17164307 ] Chengwei Wang commented on HDFS-15493: -- submit patch v001. > Update block map and name cache in

[jira] [Updated] (HDFS-15493) Update block map and name cache in parallel while loading fsimage.

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-15493?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Chengwei Wang updated HDFS-15493: - Attachment: HDFS-15493.001.patch Status: Patch Available (was: Open) > Update block map

[jira] [Updated] (HDFS-15493) Update block map and name cache in parallel while loading fsimage.

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-15493?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Chengwei Wang updated HDFS-15493: - Description: While loading INodeDirectorySection of fsimage, it will update name cache and

[jira] [Created] (HDFS-15493) Update block map and name cache in parallel while loading fsimage.

Chengwei Wang created HDFS-15493: Summary: Update block map and name cache in parallel while loading fsimage. Key: HDFS-15493 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-15493 Project: Hadoop

[jira] [Commented] (HDFS-15098) Add SM4 encryption method for HDFS

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-15098?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17164267#comment-17164267 ] lindongdong commented on HDFS-15098: [~seanlau] , Hi, the latest patch also is not OK.   for this

[jira] [Comment Edited] (HDFS-15443) Setting dfs.datanode.max.transfer.threads to a very small value can cause strange failure.

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-15443?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17163966#comment-17163966 ] AMC-team edited comment on HDFS-15443 at 7/24/20, 8:40 AM: --- Sure, thanks for

[jira] [Comment Edited] (HDFS-15439) Setting dfs.mover.retry.max.attempts to negative value will retry forever.

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-15439?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17163974#comment-17163974 ] AMC-team edited comment on HDFS-15439 at 7/24/20, 8:39 AM: --- Thanks [~ayushtkn]

[jira] [Commented] (HDFS-15098) Add SM4 encryption method for HDFS

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-15098?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17164252#comment-17164252 ] Hadoop QA commented on HDFS-15098: -- | (x) *{color:red}-1 overall{color}* | \\ \\ || Vote || Subsystem ||

[jira] [Commented] (HDFS-15098) Add SM4 encryption method for HDFS

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-15098?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17164243#comment-17164243 ] Hadoop QA commented on HDFS-15098: -- | (x) *{color:red}-1 overall{color}* | \\ \\ || Vote || Subsystem ||

[jira] [Updated] (HDFS-15098) Add SM4 encryption method for HDFS

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-15098?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] liusheng updated HDFS-15098: Attachment: (was: HDFS-15098.009.patch) > Add SM4 encryption method for HDFS >

[jira] [Updated] (HDFS-15098) Add SM4 encryption method for HDFS

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-15098?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] liusheng updated HDFS-15098: Attachment: HDFS-15098.009.patch Status: Patch Available (was: Open) > Add SM4 encryption method

[jira] [Updated] (HDFS-15098) Add SM4 encryption method for HDFS

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-15098?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] liusheng updated HDFS-15098: Status: Open (was: Patch Available) > Add SM4 encryption method for HDFS >

[jira] [Commented] (HDFS-15098) Add SM4 encryption method for HDFS

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-15098?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17164228#comment-17164228 ] liusheng commented on HDFS-15098: - Hi [~lindongdong]， Thanks for help to review, I have updated the 0009

[jira] [Updated] (HDFS-15098) Add SM4 encryption method for HDFS

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-15098?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] liusheng updated HDFS-15098: Attachment: HDFS-15098.009.patch Assignee: (was: zZtai) Status: Patch Available (was:

[jira] [Updated] (HDFS-15098) Add SM4 encryption method for HDFS

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-15098?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] liusheng updated HDFS-15098: Attachment: (was: HDFS-15098.009.patch) > Add SM4 encryption method for HDFS >

[jira] [Updated] (HDFS-15098) Add SM4 encryption method for HDFS

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-15098?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] liusheng updated HDFS-15098: Status: Open (was: Patch Available) > Add SM4 encryption method for HDFS >

[jira] [Commented] (HDFS-15098) Add SM4 encryption method for HDFS

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-15098?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17164185#comment-17164185 ] lindongdong commented on HDFS-15098: [~zZtai], hi, I find some code just for debug, may be remove

[jira] [Commented] (HDFS-15486) Costly sendResponse operation slows down async editlog handling

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-15486?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17164173#comment-17164173 ] Yiqun Lin commented on HDFS-15486: -- Hi [~yuanbo] , thanks for the comment. We don't have the  centos

[jira] [Updated] (HDFS-15098) Add SM4 encryption method for HDFS

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-15098?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] liusheng updated HDFS-15098: Attachment: HDFS-15098.009.patch Status: Patch Available (was: Open) > Add SM4 encryption method

[jira] [Updated] (HDFS-15098) Add SM4 encryption method for HDFS

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-15098?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] liusheng updated HDFS-15098: Status: Open (was: Patch Available) > Add SM4 encryption method for HDFS >