[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-12348?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16140074#comment-16140074
]
Koji Noguchi commented on HDFS-12348:
-
bq. 1) The blocks in the trash can be reduced, if datanode
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-1?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16007106#comment-16007106
]
Koji Noguchi commented on HDFS-1:
-
Curious. Has anyone seen users accidentally wiping the files
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-11357?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15834779#comment-15834779
]
Koji Noguchi commented on HDFS-11357:
-
Andrew, are your compliance/legal people ok that there still
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-10400?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15290236#comment-15290236
]
Koji Noguchi commented on HDFS-10400:
-
My point was, the INFO message on the description
{noformat}
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-10400?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15286769#comment-15286769
]
Koji Noguchi commented on HDFS-10400:
-
I'm confused with this jira. Do we have a test case when hdfs
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-8131?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14493504#comment-14493504
]
Koji Noguchi commented on HDFS-8131:
Thanks for correcting my misunderstanding.
I
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-8131?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14492573#comment-14492573
]
Koji Noguchi commented on HDFS-8131:
Hi Liu. Have you taken a look at [~kihwal]'s
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-1161?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13096475#comment-13096475
]
Koji Noguchi commented on HDFS-1161:
bq. IIRC Koji's perspective was that an admin
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-2126?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13060681#comment-13060681
]
Koji Noguchi commented on HDFS-2126:
Is it only us(Yahoo) namenodes which hits FullGC
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-271?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13053328#comment-13053328
]
Koji Noguchi commented on HDFS-271:
---
bq. Hey Koji, does the work done in HADOOP-3741 meet
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-107?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13040342#comment-13040342
]
Koji Noguchi commented on HDFS-107:
---
bq. If the value is set to false then we can continue
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-2006?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13040058#comment-13040058
]
Koji Noguchi commented on HDFS-2006:
For the API, would it help/affect HADOOP-7269?
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-157?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Koji Noguchi reopened HDFS-157:
---
bq. Hairong just opened a better Jira. HADOOP:6732
This didn't change the memory footprint on the client
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-1848?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13026340#comment-13026340
]
Koji Noguchi commented on HDFS-1848:
bq. I am surprised that this problem is not solved
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-1848?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13026125#comment-13026125
]
Koji Noguchi commented on HDFS-1848:
bq. It seems like a good idea for a cluster
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-1848?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13022799#comment-13022799
]
Koji Noguchi commented on HDFS-1848:
In our tests with disk failures, We have verified
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-1848?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13022815#comment-13022815
]
Koji Noguchi commented on HDFS-1848:
bq. That was the problem earlier, Koji. With the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-1371?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13020365#comment-13020365
]
Koji Noguchi commented on HDFS-1371:
Can we take a similar approach to mapred
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-1125?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13014718#comment-13014718
]
Koji Noguchi commented on HDFS-1125:
Does HDFS-1773 help?
Removing a datanode (failed
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-1609?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13002664#comment-13002664
]
Koji Noguchi commented on HDFS-1609:
I see.
tcsh and bash behaves differently for
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-1609?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12998001#comment-12998001
]
Koji Noguchi commented on HDFS-1609:
If we want to follow the glob handling in unix,
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-1595?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12986788#action_12986788
]
Koji Noguchi commented on HDFS-1595:
bq. So this faulty node F has no problem receiving
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-1595?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12985929#action_12985929
]
Koji Noguchi commented on HDFS-1595:
Can we describe the problem users faced before
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-107?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12980220#action_12980220
]
Koji Noguchi commented on HDFS-107:
---
bq. The second approach looks fine to me.
Second
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-1526?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12966579#action_12966579
]
Koji Noguchi commented on HDFS-1526:
Hairong, using a random number (with time as a
One bad node can incorrectly flag many files as corrupt
---
Key: HDFS-1371
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-1371
Project: Hadoop HDFS
Issue Type: Bug
Components:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-1371?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12905952#action_12905952
]
Koji Noguchi commented on HDFS-1371:
(you guys are too fast. I wanted the description
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-1158?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12905130#action_12905130
]
Koji Noguchi commented on HDFS-1158:
bq. So this should just be closed then, right?
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-1094?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12882798#action_12882798
]
Koji Noguchi commented on HDFS-1094:
Just curious. Are you getting missing/corrupt
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-1158?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Koji Noguchi updated HDFS-1158:
---
Priority: Major (was: Critical)
Lowering priority. As long as HDFS-1161 makes it to 0.21, this is
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-1161?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12868705#action_12868705
]
Koji Noguchi commented on HDFS-1161:
Thanks Eli, I think this would solve my worry
HDFS-457 increases the chances of losing blocks
Key: HDFS-1158
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-1158
Project: Hadoop HDFS
Issue Type: Bug
Components: data-node
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-1143?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12867935#action_12867935
]
Koji Noguchi commented on HDFS-1143:
bq. Hey Koji,
bq. HDFS-173 help other clients
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-1143?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12867201#action_12867201
]
Koji Noguchi commented on HDFS-1143:
HDFS-173 didn't get us enough speedup?
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-157?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Koji Noguchi resolved HDFS-157.
---
Resolution: Duplicate
Hairong just opened a better Jira. HADOOP:6732
Thanks!
dfs client -ls/-lsr
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-1102?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Koji Noguchi resolved HDFS-1102.
Resolution: Duplicate
Duplicate of HDFS-1085. It would be nice if we can fix this without
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-870?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12838583#action_12838583
]
Koji Noguchi commented on HDFS-870:
---
If we're going to add this, please make it optional.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-23?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Koji Noguchi resolved HDFS-23.
--
Resolution: Duplicate
I'm hoping HDFS-985 is our answer.
No more chasing down users hitting namenode with
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-761?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Koji Noguchi updated HDFS-761:
--
Release Note: An error checking quota policy resulted in a failure to read
the edits log, stopping the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-173?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12743285#action_12743285
]
Koji Noguchi commented on HDFS-173:
---
bq. A related problem is that a Namenode server
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-525?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12741394#action_12741394
]
Koji Noguchi commented on HDFS-525:
---
Suresh, should we re-throw the exception after
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-531?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12740226#action_12740226
]
Koji Noguchi commented on HDFS-531:
---
Are we going to keep backward compatibility with
42 matches
Mail list logo