[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-1377?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12969857#action_12969857
]
Raghu Angadi commented on HDFS-1377:
+1.
Thanks Eli. The warning in contentSummary() is
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-1377?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12965378#action_12965378
]
Raghu Angadi commented on HDFS-1377:
Thanks Eli. will review the patch tonight (tomorrow
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-1377?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12933651#action_12933651
]
Raghu Angadi commented on HDFS-1377:
I am still refreshing my memory of this NN
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-1414?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12915422#action_12915422
]
Raghu Angadi commented on HDFS-1414:
If the existing upgrade test fails, that implies
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-918?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12844620#action_12844620
]
Raghu Angadi commented on HDFS-918:
---
RE: Netty, I'm not very knowledgeable about it beyond
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-918?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12844278#action_12844278
]
Raghu Angadi commented on HDFS-918:
---
Thanks Jay.
This is a well known limitation on
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-729?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12806459#action_12806459
]
Raghu Angadi commented on HDFS-729:
---
As I understand, list of files returned in one call
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-755?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12793113#action_12793113
]
Raghu Angadi commented on HDFS-755:
---
User code should use buffering for application
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-729?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12789653#action_12789653
]
Raghu Angadi commented on HDFS-729:
---
Hi Dhruba,
Patch looks good. What would be an
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-755?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12786788#action_12786788
]
Raghu Angadi commented on HDFS-755:
---
The patch looks good except that BlockReader.in seems
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-767?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12784390#action_12784390
]
Raghu Angadi commented on HDFS-767:
---
I just briefly looked at it.
Essentially, you are
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-767?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12780765#action_12780765
]
Raghu Angadi commented on HDFS-767:
---
I wasn't aware of limit on number of accessors for
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-767?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12780813#action_12780813
]
Raghu Angadi commented on HDFS-767:
---
There is a global limit on number of threads in
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-777?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12780353#action_12780353
]
Raghu Angadi commented on HDFS-777:
---
To restate a comment in HDFS-172.
The file is created
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-763?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12777605#action_12777605
]
Raghu Angadi commented on HDFS-763:
---
+1.
totalErrors shown on 'blockScannerReport' now
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-770?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12777612#action_12777612
]
Raghu Angadi commented on HDFS-770:
---
From the datanode log :
2009-11-13 06:18:21,965
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-763?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=1215#action_1215
]
Raghu Angadi commented on HDFS-763:
---
I don't think this needs an extra unit test. That
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-763?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12776689#action_12776689
]
Raghu Angadi commented on HDFS-763:
---
+1. yes. it should be incremented only for real
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-732?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12771012#action_12771012
]
Raghu Angadi commented on HDFS-732:
---
0.20 seems to be setting 'closed' to true inside a
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-738?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12770558#action_12770558
]
Raghu Angadi commented on HDFS-738:
---
DN always picked disks in round-robin. Are you using
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-729?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12769356#action_12769356
]
Raghu Angadi commented on HDFS-729:
---
Is this a regular fsck with less output? That might
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-729?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12769480#action_12769480
]
Raghu Angadi commented on HDFS-729:
---
Using -metaSave as the tell me what is broke option
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-127?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12757371#action_12757371
]
Raghu Angadi commented on HDFS-127:
---
Raghu Finally, I am mainly proposing an explicit
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-516?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12756214#action_12756214
]
Raghu Angadi commented on HDFS-516:
---
When you get a change please point me to the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-599?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12756267#action_12756267
]
Raghu Angadi commented on HDFS-599:
---
true, essentially we need a simple way to find
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-516?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12755627#action_12755627
]
Raghu Angadi commented on HDFS-516:
---
bq. somehow, from 213 seconds to 112 seconds to
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-516?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12755033#action_12755033
]
Raghu Angadi commented on HDFS-516:
---
Hi Jay,
will go through the patch. I hope a few
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-503?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12753349#action_12753349
]
Raghu Angadi commented on HDFS-503:
---
This seems pretty useful. since this is done outside
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-173?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Raghu Angadi updated HDFS-173:
--
Hadoop Flags: [Reviewed]
Recursively deleting a directory with millions of files makes NameNode
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-559?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12747650#action_12747650
]
Raghu Angadi commented on HDFS-559:
---
Thats why sizeof(BlockInfo) is only a partial picture.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-15?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12747719#action_12747719
]
Raghu Angadi commented on HDFS-15:
--
+1. Looks good.
one nit : the check needs to consider
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-15?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12745640#action_12745640
]
Raghu Angadi commented on HDFS-15:
--
I am in favor of not having another list. I looked at
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-173?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12744660#action_12744660
]
Raghu Angadi commented on HDFS-173:
---
First the target directory to be deleted will be
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-516?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12738565#action_12738565
]
Raghu Angadi commented on HDFS-516:
---
Jay, random read is an (increasingly more) important
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-487?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12732045#action_12732045
]
Raghu Angadi commented on HDFS-487:
---
Dhruba, can you describe _how_ fileid helps with
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-463?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Raghu Angadi updated HDFS-463:
--
Tags: CreateEditLog FSImage
Resolution: Fixed
Hadoop Flags: [Reviewed]
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-487?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12731617#action_12731617
]
Raghu Angadi commented on HDFS-487:
---
Given that there is mapping from id to the file, I am
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-487?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12731620#action_12731620
]
Raghu Angadi commented on HDFS-487:
---
Given that there is mapping [...]
should be 'there is
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-463?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12731115#action_12731115
]
Raghu Angadi commented on HDFS-463:
---
Looks like the fix might just be replacing 'new
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-463?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12731141#action_12731141
]
Raghu Angadi commented on HDFS-463:
---
Does it imply CreateEditLog works with non-file
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-463?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12731148#action_12731148
]
Raghu Angadi commented on HDFS-463:
---
Right, you need the first hunk in your patch as well..
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-397?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12730464#action_12730464
]
Raghu Angadi commented on HDFS-397:
---
Regd 1) : What about 'STORAGE_JSPOOL_DIR' which
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-445?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12729808#action_12729808
]
Raghu Angadi commented on HDFS-445:
---
+1. This is an important fix for clients that keep a
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-439?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Raghu Angadi updated HDFS-439:
--
Resolution: Fixed
Status: Resolved (was: Patch Available)
I just committed this.
HADOOP-5961
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-473?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12729818#action_12729818
]
Raghu Angadi commented on HDFS-473:
---
HDFS-439 is committed. I think this jira can be
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-297?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12728440#action_12728440
]
Raghu Angadi commented on HDFS-297:
---
+1 for committing. pretty significant improvement in
46 matches
Mail list logo