[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-12088?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16102801#comment-16102801
]
lufei commented on HDFS-12088:
--
okļ¼this issue can be closed.Please close it thank you. [~drankye]]
> Remove
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-12088?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16102776#comment-16102776
]
Kai Zheng commented on HDFS-12088:
--
If the current behavior is correct by design and no work is needed
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-12088?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16102773#comment-16102773
]
Kai Zheng commented on HDFS-12088:
--
Hi folks,
I thought the current behavior was discussed in HDFS-7337.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-12088?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16075771#comment-16075771
]
lufei commented on HDFS-12088:
--
I'm sorry. It's wrong to removing an ec policy from ECPM for a "remove"
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-12088?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16074728#comment-16074728
]
Wei-Chiu Chuang commented on HDFS-12088:
Hi lufei,
could you explain the expected behavior? I was
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-12088?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16074421#comment-16074421
]
Hadoop QA commented on HDFS-12088:
--
| (x) *{color:red}-1 overall{color}* |
\\
\\
|| Vote || Subsystem ||
