[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-6489?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17105953#comment-17105953
]
Chuck Li commented on HDFS-6489:
Thanks for working on this issue. Any update about it? I am also
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-6489?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16724940#comment-16724940
]
Nand commented on HDFS-6489:
Does this issue affect HDFS 3.0.x?
What is the workaround to mitigate this issue
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-6489?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16480265#comment-16480265
]
Yongjun Zhang commented on HDFS-6489:
-
HI Guys,
Thanks for working on this issue. I have gone through
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-6489?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16381584#comment-16381584
]
wangzhiyuan commented on HDFS-6489:
---
Any update about this issue? I think frequent truncate will have
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-6489?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16163094#comment-16163094
]
Brahma Reddy Battula commented on HDFS-6489:
bq.Where is the code you posted last? I wasn't
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-6489?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16155977#comment-16155977
]
Ravi Prakash commented on HDFS-6489:
Thanks for your reply Brahma! Sorry about the tangent on
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-6489?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16120964#comment-16120964
]
Weiwei Yang commented on HDFS-6489:
---
I am un-assigning myself from this ticket, [~raviprak] do you want
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-6489?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16119797#comment-16119797
]
Brahma Reddy Battula commented on HDFS-6489:
bq.Even with this, dfsUsed and numblocks counting
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-6489?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16119138#comment-16119138
]
Ravi Prakash commented on HDFS-6489:
Hi [~brahmareddy]! Could you please update us on this issue? Also,
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-6489?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15276872#comment-15276872
]
Andrew Wang commented on HDFS-6489:
---
I guess this means that the available space block placement policy
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-6489?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15274790#comment-15274790
]
Andrew Wang commented on HDFS-6489:
---
Hi Ravi, thanks for working on this. Some comments:
* Unused
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-6489?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15260954#comment-15260954
]
Ravi Prakash commented on HDFS-6489:
The problem is here:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-6489?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15251992#comment-15251992
]
Weiwei Yang commented on HDFS-6489:
---
The conflict was caused by some changes from HADOOP-12973, I'll
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-6489?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15251140#comment-15251140
]
Weiwei Yang commented on HDFS-6489:
---
[~raviprak] Thanks for looking at this.
#1 Yes, this issue can be
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-6489?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15250640#comment-15250640
]
Ravi Prakash commented on HDFS-6489:
>From Bogdan's code (thanks for that :-) ) I see its not #1 in my
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-6489?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15250626#comment-15250626
]
Ravi Prakash commented on HDFS-6489:
Unfortunately I don't think your approach will work Weiwei! The du
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-6489?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15250592#comment-15250592
]
Ravi Prakash commented on HDFS-6489:
Thanks for the patch [~cheersyang]! Could you please let me know
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-6489?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15234692#comment-15234692
]
Weiwei Yang commented on HDFS-6489:
---
These tests can run successfully on my local environment, attach the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-6489?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15227812#comment-15227812
]
Hadoop QA commented on HDFS-6489:
-
| (x) *{color:red}-1 overall{color}* |
\\
\\
|| Vote || Subsystem ||
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-6489?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15214049#comment-15214049
]
Weiwei Yang commented on HDFS-6489:
---
Most of test failures are timeout, I can run them successfully on my
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-6489?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15211371#comment-15211371
]
Hadoop QA commented on HDFS-6489:
-
| (x) *{color:red}-1 overall{color}* |
\\
\\
|| Vote || Subsystem ||
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-6489?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15209074#comment-15209074
]
Hadoop QA commented on HDFS-6489:
-
| (x) *{color:red}-1 overall{color}* |
\\
\\
|| Vote || Subsystem ||
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-6489?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15208606#comment-15208606
]
Weiwei Yang commented on HDFS-6489:
---
I have a patch to fix this issue. The idea is during append, when
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-6489?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15203879#comment-15203879
]
Weiwei Yang commented on HDFS-6489:
---
This issue happened to us as well. We have some clients continually
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-6489?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15115206#comment-15115206
]
Bogdan Raducanu commented on HDFS-6489:
---
I've recently hit this bug in 2.7.1. I attached repro code.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-6489?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14502637#comment-14502637
]
Longchao Dong commented on HDFS-6489:
--
Are there any more infomations on this issue?
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-6489?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14026068#comment-14026068
]
Guo Ruijing commented on HDFS-6489:
---
Take example,
existing behavior:
1. create file
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-6489?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14019280#comment-14019280
]
Andrew Wang commented on HDFS-6489:
---
This sounds like correct behavior to me. We don't
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-6489?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14019492#comment-14019492
]
stanley shi commented on HDFS-6489:
---
No, the disk usage will not go back down untill
29 matches
Mail list logo
