[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-6942?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14117924#comment-14117924
]
Akira AJISAKA commented on HDFS-6942:
-
Thanks [~rchiang] for the patch. Looks good to m
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-6980?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14117913#comment-14117913
]
Tsuyoshi OZAWA commented on HDFS-6980:
--
The test failure looks related to TestPipeline
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-6980?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Tsuyoshi OZAWA updated HDFS-6980:
-
Attachment: HDFS-6980.1-2.patch
> TestWebHdfsFileSystemContract fails in trunk
> --
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-6886?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14117870#comment-14117870
]
Hadoop QA commented on HDFS-6886:
-
{color:red}-1 overall{color}. Here are the results of t
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-6980?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14117871#comment-14117871
]
Hadoop QA commented on HDFS-6980:
-
{color:red}-1 overall{color}. Here are the results of t
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-6980?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Tsuyoshi OZAWA updated HDFS-6980:
-
Attachment: HDFS-6980.1.patch
Thanks for reporting, Akira. I found that there are lots file descrip
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-6980?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Tsuyoshi OZAWA updated HDFS-6980:
-
Status: Patch Available (was: Open)
> TestWebHdfsFileSystemContract fails in trunk
> -
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-6980?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Tsuyoshi OZAWA reassigned HDFS-6980:
Assignee: Tsuyoshi OZAWA
> TestWebHdfsFileSystemContract fails in trunk
> --
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-6886?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Yi Liu updated HDFS-6886:
-
Attachment: HDFS-6886.003.patch
Update patch for [~vinayrpet]'s comments and make a git patch
> Use single editlog
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-6961?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jing Zhao updated HDFS-6961:
Attachment: HDFS-6961.002.patch
Rebase the patch since HDFS-6969 just got committed.
> Archival Storage: Blo
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-6969?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jing Zhao resolved HDFS-6969.
-
Resolution: Fixed
Hadoop Flags: Reviewed
Thanks again, Nicholas! I've committed this.
> Archival Sto
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-6606?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14117810#comment-14117810
]
Yi Liu commented on HDFS-6606:
--
The tests failure are not related, I can run them successfully
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-6961?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jing Zhao updated HDFS-6961:
Attachment: HDFS-6961.002.patch
Thanks for the comments, Nicholas and Vinay! Update the patch to address the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-6981?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14117787#comment-14117787
]
Arpit Agarwal commented on HDFS-6981:
-
The fix version can't be 2.6.0 since we have no
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-6969?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14117784#comment-14117784
]
Tsz Wo Nicholas Sze commented on HDFS-6969:
---
Oops, I looked at convertStorageType
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-6981?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14117782#comment-14117782
]
James Thomas commented on HDFS-6981:
[~arpitagarwal], thanks for filing this. Shouldn't
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-6800?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14117744#comment-14117744
]
Arpit Agarwal commented on HDFS-6800:
-
Thanks [~james.thomas]. I filed HDFS-6981 to inv
Arpit Agarwal created HDFS-6981:
---
Summary: DN upgrade with layout version change should not use trash
Key: HDFS-6981
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-6981
Project: Hadoop HDFS
Is
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-6482?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Arpit Agarwal updated HDFS-6482:
Affects Version/s: (was: 2.5.0)
3.0.0
> Use block ID-based block layout on
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-6482?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Arpit Agarwal updated HDFS-6482:
Target Version/s: 3.0.0 (was: 2.6.0)
> Use block ID-based block layout on datanodes
> --
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-6800?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Arpit Agarwal updated HDFS-6800:
Affects Version/s: (was: 2.6.0)
3.0.0
> Support Datanode layout changes wi
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-6800?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Arpit Agarwal updated HDFS-6800:
Fix Version/s: (was: 2.6.0)
> Support Datanode layout changes with rolling upgrade
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-6800?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Arpit Agarwal updated HDFS-6800:
Target Version/s: (was: 2.6.0)
> Support Datanode layout changes with rolling upgrade
> ---
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-6898?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14117730#comment-14117730
]
Arpit Agarwal commented on HDFS-6898:
-
[~cmccabe], did you get a chance to take a look
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-6969?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jing Zhao updated HDFS-6969:
Attachment: HDFS-6969.002.patch
Thanks for the review, Nicholas!
bq. i.e. use the single parameter convertSt
Akira AJISAKA created HDFS-6980:
---
Summary: TestWebHdfsFileSystemContract fails in trunk
Key: HDFS-6980
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-6980
Project: Hadoop HDFS
Issue Type: Bug
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-6606?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14117349#comment-14117349
]
Hadoop QA commented on HDFS-6606:
-
{color:red}-1 overall{color}. Here are the results of t
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-6961?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14117255#comment-14117255
]
Vinayakumar B commented on HDFS-6961:
-
One doubt I have in this part of the code in cho
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-6950?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Xiaoyu Yao updated HDFS-6950:
-
Attachment: HDFS-6950.1.patch
Update the patch.
> Add Additional unit tests for HDFS-6581
> --
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-6606?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Yi Liu updated HDFS-6606:
-
Attachment: HDFS-6606.003.patch
Update the patch for all comments.
{quote}
why do we need 2 confs?, what was wrong
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-2975?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14117198#comment-14117198
]
Yi Liu commented on HDFS-2975:
--
Thanks Uma for review and comment. Your consideration is reaso
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-6832?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14117121#comment-14117121
]
Hadoop QA commented on HDFS-6832:
-
{color:red}-1 overall{color}. Here are the results of t
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-6945?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14117122#comment-14117122
]
Hadoop QA commented on HDFS-6945:
-
{color:red}-1 overall{color}. Here are the results of t
33 matches
Mail list logo