[jira] [Commented] (HDFS-10302) BlockPlacementPolicyDefault should use default replication considerload value

2016-04-17 Thread Hadoop QA (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-10302?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15245164#comment-15245164 ] Hadoop QA commented on HDFS-10302: -- | (x) *{color:red}-1 overall{color}* | \\ \\ || Vote || Subsystem ||

[jira] [Commented] (HDFS-10291) TestShortCircuitLocalRead failing

2016-04-17 Thread Walter Su (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-10291?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15245154#comment-15245154 ] Walter Su commented on HDFS-10291: -- +1. > TestShortCircuitLocalRead failing >

[jira] [Commented] (HDFS-5453) Support fine grain locking in FSNamesystem

2016-04-17 Thread Vinayakumar B (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-5453?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15245144#comment-15245144 ] Vinayakumar B commented on HDFS-5453: - Hi [~daryn], is there any update on this? Looking forward to

[jira] [Commented] (HDFS-8161) Both Namenodes are in standby State

2016-04-17 Thread Brahma Reddy Battula (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-8161?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15245051#comment-15245051 ] Brahma Reddy Battula commented on HDFS-8161: Its happened in physical machines. > Both

[jira] [Updated] (HDFS-10302) BlockPlacementPolicyDefault should use default replication considerload value

2016-04-17 Thread Lin Yiqun (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-10302?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Lin Yiqun updated HDFS-10302: - Issue Type: Improvement (was: Bug) > BlockPlacementPolicyDefault should use default replication

[jira] [Commented] (HDFS-9412) getBlocks occupies FSLock and takes too long to complete

2016-04-17 Thread Hudson (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-9412?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15245049#comment-15245049 ] Hudson commented on HDFS-9412: -- FAILURE: Integrated in Hadoop-trunk-Commit #9625 (See

[jira] [Updated] (HDFS-10302) BlockPlacementPolicyDefault should use default replication considerload value

2016-04-17 Thread Lin Yiqun (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-10302?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Lin Yiqun updated HDFS-10302: - Attachment: HDFS-10302.001.patch > BlockPlacementPolicyDefault should use default replication

[jira] [Updated] (HDFS-10302) BlockPlacementPolicyDefault should use default replication considerload value

2016-04-17 Thread Lin Yiqun (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-10302?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Lin Yiqun updated HDFS-10302: - Status: Patch Available (was: Open) Attach a simple patch for this. > BlockPlacementPolicyDefault

[jira] [Created] (HDFS-10302) BlockPlacementPolicyDefault should use default replication considerload value

2016-04-17 Thread Lin Yiqun (JIRA)
Lin Yiqun created HDFS-10302: Summary: BlockPlacementPolicyDefault should use default replication considerload value Key: HDFS-10302 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-10302 Project: Hadoop

[jira] [Updated] (HDFS-9412) getBlocks occupies FSLock and takes too long to complete

2016-04-17 Thread Walter Su (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-9412?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Walter Su updated HDFS-9412: Resolution: Fixed Hadoop Flags: Reviewed Fix Version/s: 2.8.0 Status: Resolved (was:

[jira] [Updated] (HDFS-10301) Blocks removed by thousands due to falsely detected zombie storages

2016-04-17 Thread Konstantin Shvachko (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-10301?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Konstantin Shvachko updated HDFS-10301: --- Attachment: zombieStorageLogs.rtf > Blocks removed by thousands due to falsely

[jira] [Commented] (HDFS-10301) Blocks removed by thousands due to falsely detected zombie storages

2016-04-17 Thread Konstantin Shvachko (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-10301?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15244890#comment-15244890 ] Konstantin Shvachko commented on HDFS-10301: My DN has the following six storages: {code}

[jira] [Commented] (HDFS-10301) Blocks removed by thousands due to falsely detected zombie storages

2016-04-17 Thread Konstantin Shvachko (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-10301?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15244876#comment-15244876 ] Konstantin Shvachko commented on HDFS-10301: More details. # My DataNode has 6 storages. It

[jira] [Created] (HDFS-10301) Blocks removed by thousands due to falsely detected zombie storages

2016-04-17 Thread Konstantin Shvachko (JIRA)
Konstantin Shvachko created HDFS-10301: -- Summary: Blocks removed by thousands due to falsely detected zombie storages Key: HDFS-10301 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-10301

[jira] [Commented] (HDFS-10298) Document the usage of distcp -diff option

2016-04-17 Thread Hadoop QA (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-10298?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15244681#comment-15244681 ] Hadoop QA commented on HDFS-10298: -- | (/) *{color:green}+1 overall{color}* | \\ \\ || Vote || Subsystem

[jira] [Updated] (HDFS-10298) Document the usage of distcp -diff option

2016-04-17 Thread Takashi Ohnishi (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-10298?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Takashi Ohnishi updated HDFS-10298: --- Attachment: HDFS-10298.1.patch > Document the usage of distcp -diff option >

[jira] [Commented] (HDFS-10298) Document the usage of distcp -diff option

2016-04-17 Thread Takashi Ohnishi (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-10298?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15244677#comment-15244677 ] Takashi Ohnishi commented on HDFS-10298: Hi! I have created a patch for this. In the attached

[jira] [Updated] (HDFS-10298) Document the usage of distcp -diff option

2016-04-17 Thread Takashi Ohnishi (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-10298?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Takashi Ohnishi updated HDFS-10298: --- Status: Patch Available (was: Open) > Document the usage of distcp -diff option >

[jira] [Assigned] (HDFS-10298) Document the usage of distcp -diff option

2016-04-17 Thread Takashi Ohnishi (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-10298?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Takashi Ohnishi reassigned HDFS-10298: -- Assignee: Takashi Ohnishi > Document the usage of distcp -diff option >

[jira] [Commented] (HDFS-9412) getBlocks occupies FSLock and takes too long to complete

2016-04-17 Thread He Tianyi (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-9412?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15244578#comment-15244578 ] He Tianyi commented on HDFS-9412: - Hi, [~walter.k.su]. Would you commit this patch when available? >