[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-9322?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Rafal Wojdyla updated HDFS-9322:
Attachment: HDFS-9322.patch_1
> Keep order of addresses to nameservice mapping from configuration
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-9322?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Rafal Wojdyla updated HDFS-9322:
Labels: has-patch (was: )
Status: Patch Available (was: Open)
> Keep order of addresses to
Rafal Wojdyla created HDFS-9321:
---
Summary: Expose dispatcher parameters
Key: HDFS-9321
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-9321
Project: Hadoop HDFS
Issue Type: Improvement
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-9321?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Rafal Wojdyla updated HDFS-9321:
Labels: has-patch (was: )
Status: Patch Available (was: In Progress)
> Expose dispatcher
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-9321?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Work on HDFS-9321 started by Rafal Wojdyla.
---
> Expose dispatcher parameters
>
>
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-9321?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Rafal Wojdyla updated HDFS-9321:
Attachment: HDFS-9321.patch_1
> Expose dispatcher parameters
>
>
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-9321?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Rafal Wojdyla updated HDFS-9321:
Summary: Expose extra dispatcher parameters (was: Expose dispatcher
parameters)
> Expose extra
Rafal Wojdyla created HDFS-9322:
---
Summary: Keep order of addresses to nameservice mapping from
configuration file
Key: HDFS-9322
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-9322
Project: Hadoop
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-2892?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Rafal Wojdyla updated HDFS-2892:
Summary: Some of property descriptions are not given(hdfs-default.xml)
(was: Some of property
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-7048?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14132259#comment-14132259
]
Rafal Wojdyla commented on HDFS-7048:
-
[~yzhangal] I will update this ticket as soon as
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-6621?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14128713#comment-14128713
]
Rafal Wojdyla commented on HDFS-6621:
-
[~yzhangal] for problem 1 - patch is in
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-6621?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Rafal Wojdyla updated HDFS-6621:
Attachment: HDFS-6621_problem1.patch
Hadoop Balancer prematurely exits iterations
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-6621?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14124903#comment-14124903
]
Rafal Wojdyla commented on HDFS-6621:
-
Hi [~yzhangal]
Thanks for comments, sorry for
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-6621?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Rafal Wojdyla updated HDFS-6621:
Attachment: HDFS-6621.patch_3
Hadoop Balancer prematurely exits iterations
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-6621?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14124982#comment-14124982
]
Rafal Wojdyla commented on HDFS-6621:
-
[~yzhangal] you're correct :D Sorry.
Reproducing
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-6621?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Rafal Wojdyla updated HDFS-6621:
Attachment: HDFS-6621.patch_4
Hadoop Balancer prematurely exits iterations
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-6621?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Rafal Wojdyla updated HDFS-6621:
Attachment: HDFS-6621.patch_2
Hadoop Balancer prematurely exits iterations
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-6621?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14109788#comment-14109788
]
Rafal Wojdyla commented on HDFS-6621:
-
Hi [~yzhangal],
The patch is pretty simple -
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-6648?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14099984#comment-14099984
]
Rafal Wojdyla commented on HDFS-6648:
-
Hi [~qwertymaniac], good to know that it wasn't
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-6621?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14058496#comment-14058496
]
Rafal Wojdyla commented on HDFS-6621:
-
We have also experience this problem with
Rafal Wojdyla created HDFS-6648:
---
Summary: Order of namenodes in ConfiguredFailoverProxyProvider is
not defined by order in hdfs-site.xml
Key: HDFS-6648
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-6648
Rafal Wojdyla created HDFS-6179:
---
Summary: Synchronized
Key: HDFS-6179
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-6179
Project: Hadoop HDFS
Issue Type: Bug
Components:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-6179?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Rafal Wojdyla updated HDFS-6179:
Summary: Synchronized BPOfferService - datanode locks for slow namenode
reply. (was: Synchronized
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-6179?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13957015#comment-13957015
]
Rafal Wojdyla commented on HDFS-6179:
-
Yes it's the same problem as HDFS-5014. Thank
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-6082?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Rafal Wojdyla updated HDFS-6082:
Priority: Minor (was: Major)
List all NNs with state
---
Rafal Wojdyla created HDFS-6082:
---
Summary: List all NNs with state
Key: HDFS-6082
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-6082
Project: Hadoop HDFS
Issue Type: Improvement
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-6082?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Rafal Wojdyla updated HDFS-6082:
Description:
HAAdmin let's you determine state of *given* service. It would be nice to have
a call
27 matches
Mail list logo
