[jira] [Updated] (HDFS-16380) Result in unnecessary requeue on Observer NameNode when access by RBF in some scenes

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-16380?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] zy.jordan updated HDFS-16380: - Language: java > Result in unnecessary requeue on Observer NameNode when access by RBF in some > scenes

[jira] [Updated] (HDFS-16380) Result in unnecessary requeue on Observer NameNode when access by RBF in some scenes

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-16380?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] zy.jordan updated HDFS-16380: - Description: As HDFS-13522 introduced, user can access Observer NameNode by RBF. But it will result in

[jira] [Updated] (HDFS-16380) Result in unnecessary requeue on Observer NameNode when access by RBF in some scenes

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-16380?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] zy.jordan updated HDFS-16380: - Description: [HDFS-13522|https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-13522] > Result in unnecessary

[jira] [Created] (HDFS-16380) Result in unnecessary requeue on Observer NameNode when access by RBF in some scenes

zy.jordan created HDFS-16380: Summary: Result in unnecessary requeue on Observer NameNode when access by RBF in some scenes Key: HDFS-16380 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-16380 Project:

[jira] [Commented] (HDFS-14997) BPServiceActor processes commands from NameNode asynchronously

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-14997?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17193381#comment-17193381 ] zy.jordan commented on HDFS-14997: -- Hi, [~hexiaoqiao]. I have encounter this problem in a very heavy

[jira] [Commented] (HDFS-14997) BPServiceActor processes commands from NameNode asynchronously

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-14997?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17184873#comment-17184873 ] zy.jordan commented on HDFS-14997: -- Thanks for [~hexiaoqiao]'s answer.  Due to

[jira] [Commented] (HDFS-14997) BPServiceActor processes commands from NameNode asynchronously

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-14997?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17181563#comment-17181563 ] zy.jordan commented on HDFS-14997: -- Hi ,[~hexiaoqiao] >From this code, it looks like run process cmd

[jira] [Commented] (HDFS-14562) The behaviour of getContentSummaryInt() in getQuotaUsage() should be configurable.

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-14562?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17090433#comment-17090433 ] zy.jordan commented on HDFS-14562: -- Hi, [~LiJinglun]. Thanks for your report and fix patch, and I also

[jira] [Comment Edited] (HDFS-9388) Refactor decommission related code to support maintenance state for datanodes

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-9388?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16980976#comment-16980976 ] zy.jordan edited comment on HDFS-9388 at 11/25/19 1:46 AM: --- Hi, [~manojg],

[jira] [Commented] (HDFS-13671) Namenode deletes large dir slowly caused by FoldedTreeSet#removeAndGet

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-13671?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16980982#comment-16980982 ] zy.jordan commented on HDFS-13671: -- Hi, [~linyiqun], how about remove these blocks in a asynchronous

[jira] [Commented] (HDFS-9388) Refactor decommission related code to support maintenance state for datanodes

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-9388?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16980976#comment-16980976 ] zy.jordan commented on HDFS-9388: - Hi, [~manojg], thnks for your refactoring job. But, there is a little

[jira] [Commented] (HDFS-7877) [Umbrella] Support maintenance state for datanodes

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-7877?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16977333#comment-16977333 ] zy.jordan commented on HDFS-7877: - And I find this log {quote}2019-11-18 18:50:24,707 INFO

[jira] [Commented] (HDFS-7877) [Umbrella] Support maintenance state for datanodes

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-7877?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16977142#comment-16977142 ] zy.jordan commented on HDFS-7877: - Hi, the maintenance is a great feature. But I have encounter a little

[jira] [Commented] (HDFS-12978) Fine-grained locking while consuming journal stream.

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-12978?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16936665#comment-16936665 ] zy.jordan commented on HDFS-12978: -- Hi, [~shv], it really cost too much if don't cache the edit log

[jira] [Commented] (HDFS-14674) [SBN read] Got an unexpected txid when tail editlog

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-14674?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16907118#comment-16907118 ] zy.jordan commented on HDFS-14674: -- Hi [~wangzhaohui], thanks your answer! It means that in the

[jira] [Commented] (HDFS-14674) [SBN read] Got an unexpected txid when tail editlog

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-14674?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16904812#comment-16904812 ] zy.jordan commented on HDFS-14674: -- Hi [~wangzhaohui], I am still confused why SBN skip the remaining

[jira] [Commented] (HDFS-12978) Fine-grained locking while consuming journal stream.

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-12978?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16887584#comment-16887584 ] zy.jordan commented on HDFS-12978: -- Hi, [~shv], Could you let me know which issue is involved in the