[jira] [Commented] (HDFS-12278) LeaseManager#removeLease operation is inefficient in 2.8.

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-12278?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16120518#comment-16120518 ] Hadoop QA commented on HDFS-12278: -- | (x) *{color:red}-1 overall{color}* | \\ \\ || Vote || Subsystem ||

[jira] [Commented] (HDFS-12278) LeaseManager#removeLease operation is inefficient in 2.8.

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-12278?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16120418#comment-16120418 ] Daryn Sharp commented on HDFS-12278: I benched the remove/update/add between the priority queue and

[jira] [Commented] (HDFS-12278) LeaseManager#removeLease operation is inefficient in 2.8.

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-12278?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16120217#comment-16120217 ] Daryn Sharp commented on HDFS-12278: For context regarding the impact of the change to a priority

[jira] [Commented] (HDFS-12278) LeaseManager#removeLease operation is inefficient in 2.8.

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-12278?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16119035#comment-16119035 ] Wei-Chiu Chuang commented on HDFS-12278: updated target version based on HDFS-6757 fix version, so