[jira] [Commented] (HDFS-8872) Reporting of missing blocks is different in fsck and namenode ui/metasave

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-8872?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15985295#comment-15985295 ] Zhe Zhang commented on HDFS-8872: - Linked HDFS-10495. > Reporting of missing blocks is different in fsck

[jira] [Commented] (HDFS-8872) Reporting of missing blocks is different in fsck and namenode ui/metasave

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-8872?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15318646#comment-15318646 ] Rushabh S Shah commented on HDFS-8872: -- Thanks a lot [~mingma] for your valuable suggestions. Let me

[jira] [Commented] (HDFS-8872) Reporting of missing blocks is different in fsck and namenode ui/metasave

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-8872?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15317548#comment-15317548 ] Ming Ma commented on HDFS-8872: --- Thanks [~shahrs87]. Your suggestion to distinguish decommissioned from

[jira] [Commented] (HDFS-8872) Reporting of missing blocks is different in fsck and namenode ui/metasave

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-8872?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15307937#comment-15307937 ] Rushabh S Shah commented on HDFS-8872: -- [~mingma]: any thoughts ? > Reporting of missing blocks is

[jira] [Commented] (HDFS-8872) Reporting of missing blocks is different in fsck and namenode ui/metasave

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-8872?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15297054#comment-15297054 ] Rushabh S Shah commented on HDFS-8872: -- bq. Actually after HDFS-7933, fsck includes decommissioning

[jira] [Commented] (HDFS-8872) Reporting of missing blocks is different in fsck and namenode ui/metasave

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-8872?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15296892#comment-15296892 ] Rushabh S Shah commented on HDFS-8872: -- Thanks [~mingma] for mentioning HDFS-7933. bq. For this

[jira] [Commented] (HDFS-8872) Reporting of missing blocks is different in fsck and namenode ui/metasave

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-8872?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15283384#comment-15283384 ] Ming Ma commented on HDFS-8872: --- Agree that we should try to make fsck and webUI consistent Note that isn't

[jira] [Commented] (HDFS-8872) Reporting of missing blocks is different in fsck and namenode ui/metasave

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-8872?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15253325#comment-15253325 ] Haohui Mai commented on HDFS-8872: -- I think it is a good to call it either way, just need to make sure

[jira] [Commented] (HDFS-8872) Reporting of missing blocks is different in fsck and namenode ui/metasave

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-8872?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15235510#comment-15235510 ] Wei-Chiu Chuang commented on HDFS-8872: --- Or, instead of calling it as "missing blocks" on the web UI,

[jira] [Commented] (HDFS-8872) Reporting of missing blocks is different in fsck and namenode ui/metasave

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-8872?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15235491#comment-15235491 ] Wei-Chiu Chuang commented on HDFS-8872: --- Looking at the source code, I think there is a mismatch of

[jira] [Commented] (HDFS-8872) Reporting of missing blocks is different in fsck and namenode ui/metasave

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-8872?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=14974764#comment-14974764 ] Rushabh S Shah commented on HDFS-8872: -- [~vinodkv]: Apologies for the trouble. Will take care next