[jira] [Commented] (HDFS-9279) Decomissioned capacity should not be considered for configured/used capacity

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-9279?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15085445#comment-15085445 ] Rajat Jain commented on HDFS-9279: -- While it makes sense to not include decommissioning nodes in

[jira] [Commented] (HDFS-9279) Decomissioned capacity should not be considered for configured/used capacity

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-9279?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15085577#comment-15085577 ] Kihwal Lee commented on HDFS-9279: -- bq. Because the data present in the decommissioning nodes would

[jira] [Commented] (HDFS-9279) Decomissioned capacity should not be considered for configured/used capacity

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-9279?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=14978664#comment-14978664 ] Kihwal Lee commented on HDFS-9279: -- The jira was originally to exclude "live" decommissioned nodes from

[jira] [Commented] (HDFS-9279) Decomissioned capacity should not be considered for configured/used capacity

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-9279?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=14978744#comment-14978744 ] Kihwal Lee commented on HDFS-9279: -- +1 the patch looks good. > Decomissioned capacity should not be

[jira] [Commented] (HDFS-9279) Decomissioned capacity should not be considered for configured/used capacity

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-9279?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=14978708#comment-14978708 ] Kihwal Lee commented on HDFS-9279: -- Actually, I think this makes more sense. Assuming roughly even

[jira] [Commented] (HDFS-9279) Decomissioned capacity should not be considered for configured/used capacity

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-9279?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=14978758#comment-14978758 ] Kihwal Lee commented on HDFS-9279: -- I've committed this to trunk and branch-2. Thank you for working on

[jira] [Commented] (HDFS-9279) Decomissioned capacity should not be considered for configured/used capacity

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-9279?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=14978926#comment-14978926 ] Hudson commented on HDFS-9279: -- FAILURE: Integrated in Hadoop-trunk-Commit #8720 (See

[jira] [Commented] (HDFS-9279) Decomissioned capacity should not be considered for configured/used capacity

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-9279?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=14979002#comment-14979002 ] Hudson commented on HDFS-9279: -- FAILURE: Integrated in Hadoop-Mapreduce-trunk-Java8 #596 (See

[jira] [Commented] (HDFS-9279) Decomissioned capacity should not be considered for configured/used capacity

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-9279?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=14979081#comment-14979081 ] Hudson commented on HDFS-9279: -- FAILURE: Integrated in Hadoop-Yarn-trunk-Java8 #609 (See

[jira] [Commented] (HDFS-9279) Decomissioned capacity should not be considered for configured/used capacity

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-9279?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=14979100#comment-14979100 ] Hudson commented on HDFS-9279: -- FAILURE: Integrated in Hadoop-Yarn-trunk #1332 (See

[jira] [Commented] (HDFS-9279) Decomissioned capacity should not be considered for configured/used capacity

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-9279?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=14979240#comment-14979240 ] Hudson commented on HDFS-9279: -- FAILURE: Integrated in Hadoop-Mapreduce-trunk #2539 (See

[jira] [Commented] (HDFS-9279) Decomissioned capacity should not be considered for configured/used capacity

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-9279?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=14979549#comment-14979549 ] Hudson commented on HDFS-9279: -- ABORTED: Integrated in Hadoop-Hdfs-trunk-Java8 #547 (See

[jira] [Commented] (HDFS-9279) Decomissioned capacity should not be considered for configured/used capacity

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-9279?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=14979465#comment-14979465 ] Hudson commented on HDFS-9279: -- FAILURE: Integrated in Hadoop-Hdfs-trunk #2485 (See

[jira] [Commented] (HDFS-9279) Decomissioned capacity should not be considered for configured/used capacity

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-9279?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=14977236#comment-14977236 ] Hadoop QA commented on HDFS-9279: - \\ \\ | (x) *{color:red}-1 overall{color}* | \\ \\ || Vote || Subsystem

[jira] [Commented] (HDFS-9279) Decomissioned capacity should not be considered for configured/used capacity

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-9279?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=14977333#comment-14977333 ] Kuhu Shukla commented on HDFS-9279: --- The latest test failures are unrelated. From a previous failure,

[jira] [Commented] (HDFS-9279) Decomissioned capacity should not be considered for configured/used capacity

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-9279?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=14975088#comment-14975088 ] Hadoop QA commented on HDFS-9279: - \\ \\ | (x) *{color:red}-1 overall{color}* | \\ \\ || Vote || Subsystem

[jira] [Commented] (HDFS-9279) Decomissioned capacity should not be considered for configured/used capacity

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-9279?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=14972309#comment-14972309 ] Hadoop QA commented on HDFS-9279: - \\ \\ | (x) *{color:red}-1 overall{color}* | \\ \\ || Vote || Subsystem

[jira] [Commented] (HDFS-9279) Decomissioned capacity should not be considered for configured/used capacity

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-9279?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=14971986#comment-14971986 ] Hadoop QA commented on HDFS-9279: - \\ \\ | (x) *{color:red}-1 overall{color}* | \\ \\ || Vote || Subsystem