[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-9534?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15177048#comment-15177048
]
Hudson commented on HDFS-9534:
--
FAILURE: Integrated in Hadoop-trunk-Commit #9415 (See
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-9534?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15177026#comment-15177026
]
Arpit Agarwal commented on HDFS-9534:
-
+1, fairly sure the unit test failures are unrelated. Nice work
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-9534?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15176910#comment-15176910
]
Hadoop QA commented on HDFS-9534:
-
| (x) *{color:red}-1 overall{color}* |
\\
\\
|| Vote || Subsystem ||
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-9534?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15176197#comment-15176197
]
Xiaobing Zhou commented on HDFS-9534:
-
004 fixed UT failures. Thanks for review [~arpiagariu]
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-9534?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15174306#comment-15174306
]
Chris Nauroth commented on HDFS-9534:
-
+1 from me for patch v003. Thank you, [~xiaobingo]!
> Add CLI
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-9534?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15172598#comment-15172598
]
Arpit Agarwal commented on HDFS-9534:
-
The TestHarFileSystem and TestFilterFileSystem failures are
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-9534?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15170381#comment-15170381
]
Hadoop QA commented on HDFS-9534:
-
| (x) *{color:red}-1 overall{color}* |
\\
\\
|| Vote || Subsystem ||
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-9534?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15170219#comment-15170219
]
Xiaobing Zhou commented on HDFS-9534:
-
Thanks [~arpitagarwal]. 003 patch addressed 1/2/3/4 except 'one
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-9534?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15143703#comment-15143703
]
Arpit Agarwal commented on HDFS-9534:
-
Thanks for updating the patch [~xiaobingo]. My comments on the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-9534?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15141797#comment-15141797
]
Xiaobing Zhou commented on HDFS-9534:
-
Thanks [~cnauroth] [~walter.k.su] [~jingzhao] [~arpitagarwal]
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-9534?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15142087#comment-15142087
]
Hadoop QA commented on HDFS-9534:
-
| (x) *{color:red}-1 overall{color}* |
\\
\\
|| Vote || Subsystem ||
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-9534?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15113400#comment-15113400
]
Jing Zhao commented on HDFS-9534:
-
Yeah, for the semantic of the new op, I agree with the comments from
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-9534?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15110288#comment-15110288
]
Vinayakumar B commented on HDFS-9534:
-
1.
{code}
/**
+ * Remove the storage policy st for a given
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-9534?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15109393#comment-15109393
]
Chris Nauroth commented on HDFS-9534:
-
Here are more details on the user scenario that prompted me to
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-9534?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15109589#comment-15109589
]
Arpit Agarwal commented on HDFS-9534:
-
bq. I had been thinking that the remove operation applies just
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-9534?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15109591#comment-15109591
]
Chris Nauroth commented on HDFS-9534:
-
Also, would you please update documentation to mention the new
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-9534?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15105595#comment-15105595
]
Xiaobing Zhou commented on HDFS-9534:
-
Thanks [~walter.k.su], do you think what semantic of
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-9534?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15106366#comment-15106366
]
Jing Zhao commented on HDFS-9534:
-
Currently unspecified policy means using the default policy. Thus I do
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-9534?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15105854#comment-15105854
]
Arpit Agarwal commented on HDFS-9534:
-
Hi Walter, Xiaobing, this approach looks fine to me. I see no
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-9534?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15101365#comment-15101365
]
Walter Su commented on HDFS-9534:
-
Thanks [~xiaobingo].
1. I think the original design doesn't mean to make
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-9534?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15090255#comment-15090255
]
Xiaobing Zhou commented on HDFS-9534:
-
The high level impl is the added removeStoragePolicy RPC call
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-9534?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15090396#comment-15090396
]
Hadoop QA commented on HDFS-9534:
-
| (x) *{color:red}-1 overall{color}* |
\\
\\
|| Vote || Subsystem ||
22 matches
Mail list logo
