Re: LC doc on Hebrew references in NARS

2008-06-19 Thread Lenore Bell
Dear Colleagues, I highly recommend that when we discuss this topic, we use Joan's excellent examples document/discussion paper as a guide. Joan didn't mention in her messages, but LC's Hebraica cataloging staff devoted a number of meetings to these issues, and managed only to reach consensus

Re: LC doc on Hebrew references in NARS

2008-06-19 Thread Joan C Biella
As Lenore says, a serious discussion of these topics can go on for weeks. Yossi has just suggested to me that the meeting of the Cataloging Committee (no matter how far into the night it goes!) will not be long enough for us to really sink our teeth just into the various methods of approach.

Re: LC doc on Hebrew references in NARS

2008-06-19 Thread Heidi Lerner
Monday would be my preference since I am leaving Tuesday afternoon. Alternatively how about a breakfast meeting Monday or Tuesday morning? Heidi G. Lerner Hebraica/Judaica Cataloger Catalog Dept. Stanford University Libraries Stanford, CA 94305-6004 ph: 650-725-9953 fax: 650-725-1120 e-mail:

LC doc on Hebrew references in NARS

2008-06-19 Thread Joseph Galron
Heidi, I am afraid that a breakfast meeting will not be productive: too limited time, too much noise in the dining hall, too many people around ... Yossi On Thu, Jun 19, 2008 at 2:17 PM, Heidi Lerner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Monday would be my preference since I am leaving Tuesday afternoon.

Re: LC doc on Hebrew references in NARS

2008-06-19 Thread Joan C Biella
How about a breakfast meeting (7-8:30) on Monday morning, to be followed by a breakfast meeting on Tuesday morning if needed? (And it very likely will be, depending on how much we find we want to discuss in person). Joan Heidi Lerner [EMAIL PROTECTED] 6/19/2008 2:17 PM Monday would be my

RE: LC doc on Hebrew references in NARS

2008-06-19 Thread Rabenstein, Bernie
There is another issue that I could bring up and that is: The need to provide authority records for Hebrew title series with cross references from variant spellings (e.g. but not limited to ketiv male vs. ketiv haser), English forms of the series referring to the Hebrew form -- up to now they

nonroman references, not nonroman headings

2008-06-19 Thread Joan C Biella
I see from the early responses to my guidelines document that there's a basic principle the document doesn't discuss. We're not (yet) creating nonroman HEADINGS. In the LC/NACO Authority File, there will be, for the foreseeable future, no 1XX that is not in roman script. What we'll begin to