RDA proper  makes no recommendations about MARC sub-fields, and $f is
still a functioning and valid sub-field.

I've been adding them whenever the UT is for an expression and there's
a conflict with an extant authority, or when one 24010 Works needs to
be distinguished from another 24010 Works. As a courtesy to everyone
else, I've been trying to establish everything.

B



On Wed, Nov 18, 2015 at 1:17 PM, Jay Rovner <jarov...@jtsa.edu> wrote:
> Perhaps I am missing something. I thought that RDA cataloging no longer used 
> subfield f dates in uniform titles. So is the information below of historical 
> interest only, or are $$f dates indeed being added?
>
>            JR
>
> Jay Rovner, PhD
> Manuscript Bibliographer
> The Library of The Jewish Theological Seminary
> 5501 Library
> 3080 Broadway
> New York City, New York  10027
> (212) 678-8045
>
> Please note:  The JTS Library’s archives are temporarily to accommodate 
> packing of our Special Collections in advance of our rebuilding project. The 
> archives will reopen on January 4, 2016, in the Temporary Library located on 
> the 7th floor of JTS’s Kripke and Schiff buildings.
>
> The Special Collections are closed for approximately four years. Reference 
> services for the Special Collections will continue throughout this period. 
> Please be sure to check for digital copies of manuscripts and rare books.
>
> For help in finding what you might need, please email sadiam...@jtsa.edu or 
> s...@jtsa.edu with Special Collections requests, or our reference librarians 
> or visit the Library’s website.
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Heb-naco [mailto:heb-naco-bounces+jarovner=jtsa....@lists.osu.edu] On 
> Behalf Of Robert M. TALBOTT
> Sent: Wednesday, November 18, 2015 12:27 PM
> To: Hebrew Name Authority Funnel
> Subject: Re: [Heb-NACO] [PCCLIST] Works. Selections (Date)
>
> For what it's worth, as I understand it, parentheses are for works and $f is 
> for expressions.
>
> On Wed, Nov 18, 2015 at 8:10 AM, Heidi G Lerner <ler...@stanford.edu> wrote:
>> Yes!
>>
>>
>> Heidi G. Lerner
>>
>> Metadata Librarian for Hebraica and Judaica
>>
>> Metadata Dept.
>>
>> Stanford University Libraries
>>
>> Stanford, CA 94305-6004
>>
>> ph: 650-725-9953
>>
>> fax: 650-725-1120
>>
>> e-mail: ler...@stanford.edu
>>
>>
>>
>> ________________________________
>> From: Heb-naco <heb-naco-boun...@lists.osu.edu> on behalf of Jasmin
>> Shinohara <jsh...@pobox.upenn.edu>
>> Sent: Tuesday, November 17, 2015 2:28 PM
>> To: Hebrew Name Authority Funnel
>> Subject: Re: [Heb-NACO] [PCCLIST] Works. Selections (Date)
>>
>> See Stephen Hearn's email from yesterday (3:02PM), where he says:
>>
>> "Yes, it would be more in keeping with MARC21 to add a date qualifier
>> to subfield $p in parentheses without $f when it distinguishes the
>> work being named.  In the MARC21 Bib Format under Heading Fields, X30,
>> the text distinguishes between "date of publication" added to a
>> uniform title field in subfield $f and "Date added parenthetically to
>> distinguish between identical uniform titles" without separate subfield 
>> coding."
>>
>> As I understand it, when added in parenthesis the date is needed as
>> part of the access point for differentiation; in $f it's just added
>> for the sake of extra information.
>>
>> Heidi, do I understand that correctly?
>>
>> On 11/16/2015 1:56 PM, Judith Zupnick wrote:
>>
>> What is the difference whether one records the date in subfield f or
>> in parentheses?
>>
>>
>>
>> ________________________________
>> From: Heb-naco <heb-naco-boun...@lists.osu.edu> on behalf of Heidi G
>> Lerner <ler...@stanford.edu>
>> Sent: Monday, November 16, 2015 8:44 AM
>> To: HebNACO
>> Subject: [Heb-NACO] Fwd: [PCCLIST] Works. Selections (Date)
>>
>> FYI
>>
>> Sent from my iPhone
>>
>> Begin forwarded message:
>>
>> From: "Adam L. Schiff" <asch...@uw.edu>
>> Date: November 13, 2015 at 4:03:49 PM EST
>> To: <pccl...@listserv.loc.gov>
>> Subject: [PCCLIST] Works. Selections (Date)
>> Reply-To: Program for Cooperative Cataloging
>> <pccl...@listserv.loc.gov>
>>
>> I did a keyword search today in the OCLC authority file for titles
>> containing the words works, selections, and 2015.  There are records
>> like
>> these:
>>
>>
>>
>> Ashlag, Yehudah. ǂt Works. ǂk Selections (2015)
>>
>> Dōgen, ǂd 1200-1253. ǂt Works. ǂk Selections (2015)
>>
>> Jano, Jack. ǂt Works. ǂk Selections (2015)
>>
>> Kook, Abraham Isaac, ǂd 1865-1935. ǂt Works. ǂk Selections (2015)
>>
>> Lovecraft, H. P. ǂq (Howard Phillips), ǂd 1890-1937. ǂt Works. ǂk
>> Selections
>> (2015)
>>
>>
>>
>> But many, many more records like these:
>>
>>
>>
>> Austen, Jane, ǂd 1775-1817. ǂt Works. ǂk Selections. ǂf 2015
>>
>> Benjamin, Walter, ǂd 1892-1940. ǂt Works. ǂk Selections. ǂf 2015
>>
>> Chopin, Kate, ǂd 1850-1904. ǂt Works. ǂk Selections. ǂf 2015
>>
>> Jackson, Shirley, ǂd 1916-1965. ǂt Works. ǂk Selections. ǂf 2015
>>
>> Lawrence, D. H. ǂq (David Herbert), ǂd 1885-1930. ǂt Works. ǂk Selections.
>> ǂf 2015
>>
>> Madison, James, ǂd 1751-1836. ǂt Works. ǂk Selections. ǂf 2015
>>
>> Man Ray, ǂd 1890-1976. ǂt Works. ǂk Selections. ǂf 2015
>>
>> Noonan, Peggy, ǂd 1950- ǂt Works. ǂk Selections. ǂf 2015
>>
>>
>>
>> And more complicated ones such as:
>>
>>
>>
>> Piglia, Ricardo. ǂt Works. ǂk Selections. ǂf 2015 ǂs (Editorial
>> Universidad de Talca)
>>
>> Piglia, Ricardo. ǂt Works. ǂk Selections. ǂf 2015 ǂs (Eterna Cadencia
>> Editora)
>>
>>
>>
>> Since Works. Selections is considered a work access point and not an
>> expression point, when breaking a conflict with another collection
>> that has the same collective title, the qualifier(s) should be put in
>> paretheses and no subfielding is used in such a situation (work
>> qualifiers are never preceded by subfield coding).
>>
>>
>>
>> It doesn’t look like many NACO catalogers understand this from the
>> disparity between the number of correctly coded records and the incorrectly 
>> coded
>> ones.   Do we need somehow to do a better job of teaching this?  Do we need
>> a project to clean up all the incorrectly coded Works. Selections RDA
>> access points?  Or does it not matter?
>>
>>
>>
>> Adam
>>
>>
>>
>> Adam L. Schiff
>>
>> Principal Cataloger
>>
>> University of Washington Libraries
>>
>> Box 352900
>>
>> Seattle, WA 98195-2900
>>
>> asch...@uw.edu
>>
>> (206) 543-8409
>>
>> (206) 685-8782 fax
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Heb-naco mailing list
>> Heb-naco@lists.osu.edu
>> https://lists.osu.edu/mailman/listinfo/heb-naco
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Heb-naco mailing list
>> Heb-naco@lists.osu.edu
>> https://lists.osu.edu/mailman/listinfo/heb-naco
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Bob Talbott
>
> Principal cataloger/Hebraica cataloger
>
> UC Berkeley
>
> 250 Moffitt
>
> Berkeley, CA 94720
>
> יול נא מי באי מאי בלאק טעלעסקאפ
> _______________________________________________
> Heb-naco mailing list
> Heb-naco@lists.osu.edu
> https://lists.osu.edu/mailman/listinfo/heb-naco



-- 
Bob Talbott

Principal cataloger/Hebraica cataloger

UC Berkeley

250 Moffitt

Berkeley, CA 94720

יול נא מי באי מאי בלאק טעלעסקאפ
_______________________________________________
Heb-naco mailing list
Heb-naco@lists.osu.edu
https://lists.osu.edu/mailman/listinfo/heb-naco

Reply via email to