On Wed, 01 Jul 2009 12:35:58 -0700, Cary wrote:
> On Jul 1, 1:20 pm, Cary wrote:
>> BTW - this doesn't work for vs.
>
> I know it's a bad sign to keep replying to yourself :-)
>
> I just found this link about vs behavior:
> http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/34h23df8(VS.80).aspx
Worth not
On Jul 1, 1:20 pm, Cary wrote:
> BTW - this doesn't work for vs.
I know it's a bad sign to keep replying to yourself :-)
I just found this link about vs behavior:
http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/34h23df8(VS.80).aspx
___
help-gplusplus mailing l
On Jul 1, 10:00 am, Cary wrote:
> On Jul 1, 1:04 am, Thomas Maeder wrote:
> > Cary writes:
> > > The following code compiles, but the linker complains of an undefined
> > > reference. If I comment out the line with *xx* it will link. Is this
> > > a known and/or fixed bug in later versions of
On Jul 1, 1:04 am, Thomas Maeder wrote:
> Cary writes:
> > The following code compiles, but the linker complains of an undefined
> > reference. If I comment out the line with *xx* it will link. Is this
> > a known and/or fixed bug in later versions of gcc?
>
> No. It's a bug in your program.
>
Cary writes:
> The following code compiles, but the linker complains of an undefined
> reference. If I comment out the line with *xx* it will link. Is this
> a known and/or fixed bug in later versions of gcc?
No. It's a bug in your program.
> SLES 10.2
> gcc --version gcc (GCC) 4.1.2 2007011
The following code compiles, but the linker complains of an undefined
reference. If I comment out the line with *xx* it will link. Is this
a known and/or fixed bug in later versions of gcc?
SLES 10.2
gcc --version gcc (GCC) 4.1.2 20070115 (SUSE Linux)
replace.cpp:
#include
#include
class A
{
