> Oh, I am terribly sorry. I didn't realize I am not allowed to speak
> without your permission.
>
It is simply very frustrating when one asks a question and people
answer a different question which has nothing to do with your inquiry,
then tells you that you are lame for doing something.
> In tha
"jinxidoru" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Paul Pluzhnikov wrote:
>>
>> There is a more fundamental reason why it would not work:
>>
> Please just stick to the actual question.
Oh, I am terribly sorry. I didn't realize I am not allowed to speak
without your permission.
> I already have my class
>
Paul Pluzhnikov wrote:
>
> There is a more fundamental reason why it would not work:
> a non-static method can not be a signal handler, since the kernel
> will not supply 'this' parameter to it.
>
Please just stick to the actual question. I already have my class
handling signals just fine. I hav
"jinxidoru" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I had an idea for something the other day, but it now appears that it
> will not work.
There is a more fundamental reason why it would not work:
a non-static method can not be a signal handler, since the kernel
will not supply 'this' parameter to it.
Bes
I had an idea for something the other day, but it now appears that it
will not work. Nevertheless, I thought that I might as well post the
question on the off-chance this is possible. What I want to do is have
a parent class with a bunch of non-pure virtual methods. There will be
one method for
