Re: gmake error: No rule to make target lib_file.a

2008-05-10 Thread D3|\||\|!$
Dave Seaman wrote: > On Wed, 7 May 2008 05:53:45 -0700 (PDT), D3|\||\|!$ wrote: > > > I supplied the libraryname along with the path as "dir_pathname/ > > libfilename1.a dir_pathname/libfilename2.a.." in the make options. > > Gmake shows success but does not create the corresponding .o and > > bi

Re: gmake error: No rule to make target lib_file.a

2008-05-10 Thread Dave Seaman
On Thu, 8 May 2008 05:18:03 -0700 (PDT), D3|\||\|!$ wrote: > Dave Seaman wrote: >> On Wed, 7 May 2008 05:53:45 -0700 (PDT), D3|\||\|!$ wrote: >> > I supplied the libraryname along with the path as "dir_pathname/ >> > libfilename1.a dir_pathname/libfilename2.a.." in the make options. >> > Gmake s

Re: gmake error: No rule to make target lib_file.a

2008-05-10 Thread main13
> You provide dependencies in the Makefile. That's what it's for. The > entries there mostly specify dependencies and rules for bringing a target > up to date. For example, if your Makefile has > > foo.o: foo.c > ${CC} ${CFLAGS} -c $< -o $@ > > that means that foo.o depends on f

Re: gmake error: No rule to make target lib_file.a

2008-05-10 Thread Dave Seaman
On Fri, 9 May 2008 05:25:50 -0700 (PDT), [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >> You provide dependencies in the Makefile. That's what it's for. The >> entries there mostly specify dependencies and rules for bringing a target >> up to date. For example, if your Makefile has >> >> foo.o: foo.c >>