see the list of alternative math packages on the GNU GSL home
page? You might check to see if there is a Java SVD implementation in
there somewhere.
On Tue, May 14, 2024 at 10:49 PM lostbits wrote:
I don't think that this will do. The issue is that C is not
cross-platform. The C code
:
The GSL website home page lists JavaCPP, a package of Java
wrappers for GSL. I think this is your best approach, mature and
time tested, among other reasons. Will this be sufficient for your
project?
On Tue, May 14, 2024 at 9:11 AM lostbits wrote:
Sorry to intrude
Sorry to intrude. I'm working on a Java project and would like to use
(at least) SVD in it. Is there a Java version of GSL, or GSL lookalike
anywhere?
This is not a heavy-duty numerical processing application, and time is
not a constraint. Java was chosen because it is cross-platform, a
On 5/11/2018 12:35 AM, Francesco Florian wrote:
On Thursday, May 10, 2018 8:17:47 PM CEST lostbits wrote:
On 5/10/2018 8:08 AM, Patrick Alken wrote:
On 05/10/2018 04:18 AM, Francesco Florian wrote:
Hello!
Since I have received no answer, I wonder whether this is the right
mailing list
On 1/28/2018 10:01 AM, John D Lamb wrote:
On 27/01/18 19:38, Vincent Vandalon wrote:
Dear All,
I am curious why the standard binary operators are not overloaded for
the
gsl_complex type in C++; I presume this overloading is omitted
intentionally (since you can quickly write them yourself).
Why do views have to be on the stack? It is easy to construct a stack
based view and use this view throughout the program so I don't
understand the restriction?
Why are there restrictions in using Matrix views in certain functions,
GNU Scientific Library 8.4, or does the manual mean to say
