Re: GuixSD on arm (ng0)

2016-07-05 Thread ng0
Leo Famulari writes: > On Tue, Jul 05, 2016 at 03:04:56PM +0200, David Craven wrote: >> Just chiming in here... >> >> I know that github being propietary software probably won't be >> considered, but it is unarguably an awesome piece of software, >> possibly the best propietary software since

Re: GuixSD on arm

2016-07-05 Thread Ricardo Wurmus
Jookia <166...@gmail.com> writes: > - Patches would get lost regularly. Yeah, this is still a problem for me. Many patches slip by because I have no capacity to review them in time. I have settled on reviewing things that I feel I’m a little more qualified to review than others, such as R

Re: GuixSD on arm (ng0)

2016-07-05 Thread Alex Sassmannshausen
Hello, Leo Famulari writes: > On Tue, Jul 05, 2016 at 03:04:56PM +0200, David Craven wrote: >> Just chiming in here... >> >> I know that github being propietary software probably won't be >> considered, but it is unarguably an awesome piece of software, >> possibly the best propietary software

Re: GuixSD on arm

2016-07-05 Thread Jookia
On Tue, Jul 05, 2016 at 10:23:07AM +0200, Ludovic Courtès wrote: > Howdy Jookia, Thanks for your reply! I just want to follow up to elaborate on a few things: > Jookia <166...@gmail.com> skribis: > > > - Patches would get lost regularly. > > Lack of responsiveness is terrible, but I think it’s

Re: GuixSD on arm (ng0)

2016-07-05 Thread David Craven
I don't see guixsd as a linux distro but more as a linux distro building kit. Sure there are default options for new users, but the idea behind guix was to be like emacs right? So freedom and hackability are the most important core values here, including the freedom of choice of bootloader. Also

Re: GuixSD on arm

2016-07-05 Thread Alex Sassmannshausen
Hey Jookia, You might not be looking for this kind of email, but I wanted to send it anyway, feel free to ignore… I'm sorry to hear you feel the project is currently not set up to help people like you contribute. Obviously I cannot speak for the project, as I'm rather involved on the sidelines

Re: GuixSD on arm (ng0)

2016-07-05 Thread David Craven
Just chiming in here... I know that github being propietary software probably won't be considered, but it is unarguably an awesome piece of software, possibly the best propietary software since google search :-) I think that using github would improve the efficiency of submitting/reviewing

Re: GuixSD on arm

2016-07-05 Thread ng0
Hi, thanks for your reply Jookia. This message makes it more clear to me why you quit/no longer consider the other project a while (some months?) ago. While I can not understand all of it, I have sympathy and can understand the current decisions you made. Further below a comment on some topics.

Re: Reproducible bootstrapping

2016-07-05 Thread t3sserakt
Am 05.07.2016 10:11 schrieb l...@gnu.org: t3sserakt skribis: I was talking about reproducible builds like it is mentioned here: https://lwn.net/Articles/663954/ Currently a large fraction (no exact figure yet) of the packages are bit-reproducible, but it’s not 100%.

Re: udev rules and system configuration

2016-07-05 Thread Ludovic Courtès
Hello! Ricardo Wurmus skribis: > Ludovic Courtès writes: > >> Ricardo Wurmus skribis: > >>> Here’s an idea, which might be bad: how about adding a feature to load >>> and merge a directory tree of configuration files as they are? For >>>

Re: GuixSD on arm

2016-07-05 Thread t3sserakt
Am 05.07.16 um 00:18 schrieb Jookia: > On Mon, Jul 04, 2016 at 05:14:56PM +, ng0 wrote: >> t3sserakt writes: >> >>> Hi Ludo, >>> >>> I would like to help, but I have no idea where to start. >>> I am "just" an application developer, and do not have >>> the right knowledge for doing this task