Hi,
On ven., 19 août 2022 at 12:37, "Mike Jones" wrote:
> Presumably these aren't deduplicated due to the differing
> self-references?
Yes.
Note that this happens for only the packages with multi-outputs impacted
by grafted ones. If I am correct, using Guix 65cabb0, the number of
packages
Hi all!
On Fri, 19 Aug 2022, at 7:13 AM, Ricardo Wurmus wrote:
> This sounds like grafts working as intended. Do you also have more
> than one instance of icecat – one using the graft and one without?
After building the profile do I indeed have two instances of icecat in
the store. But when I
Hi,
On ven., 19 août 2022 at 08:13, Ricardo Wurmus wrote:
> This sounds like grafts working as intended. Do you also have more than
> one instance of icecat – one using the graft and one without?
>
> (Due to deduplication in /gnu/store this is not as wasteful as it may
> seem.)
Using Guix
"Mike Jones" writes:
> If I rebuild my profile with --no-grafts, the mesa used by programs and
> the one in the profile are the same, so I'll just put this down to some
> weirdness with grafting.
This sounds like grafts working as intended. Do you also have more than
one instance of icecat –
Hello,
Thanks for the hints.
> I assume you installed mesa into your profile — or some other package
> installed in your profile has mesa as „propagated input“.
>
> Try „guix package -l“ to see whether it is installed in your profile.
I haven't installed mesa explicitly, and it doesn't show up
Am 14.08.22 um 13:31 schrieb Mike Jones:
So my question boils down to: why is the copy of mesa in
~/.guix-profile/lib different to the one to which programs in the same
profile are linked? And is there any guix command I can use to inspect
exactly how/why these copies differ?
I assume you
