Amirouche,
On 16/03/17 21:56, Amirouche wrote:
> Le 16/03/2017 à 21:28, Tobias Geerinckx-Rice a écrit :
>> [...] I'm mainly curious and slightly puzzled as to why
>> this question keeps popping up.
>
> Sorry!
Not at all. Thanks for making me think about this some more and put my
thoughts into
Le 16/03/2017 à 21:28, Tobias Geerinckx-Rice a écrit :
Amirouche,
On 16/03/17 19:52, Amirouche wrote:
Héllo,
Hi!
I'm not the most technically qualified person to answer this, nor the
most articulate, but I'm mainly curious and slightly puzzled as to why
this question keeps popping up.
On 16/03/17 21:28, Tobias Geerinckx-Rice wrote:
> [2]: Side rant: the myth of semantic versioning needs to die.
> [...]
> There is simply nothing there to take advantage of.
To be taken with a grain of salt, but no more than one.
Old man yells at packages,
T G-R
signature.asc
Description:
Hi Tobias,
On Thu, Mar 16, 2017 at 4:28 PM, Tobias Geerinckx-Rice wrote:
> Amirouche,
>
> On 16/03/17 19:52, Amirouche wrote:
>> Héllo,
>
> Hi!
>
> I'm not the most technically qualified person to answer this, nor the
> most articulate, but I'm mainly curious and slightly puzzled
Amirouche,
On 16/03/17 19:52, Amirouche wrote:
> Héllo,
Hi!
I'm not the most technically qualified person to answer this, nor the
most articulate, but I'm mainly curious and slightly puzzled as to why
this question keeps popping up. I hope others will join in, since I fear
this hints at some
Héllo,
AFAIU guix does hardcode the dependencies so that to know the dependencies
one has onlytocrawl the dependency DAG using a BFS or something. I don't
know what is the exact part in guix that does that. It's only my
understanding.
What about having apt-like dependency resolution, also