Hi,
>>
>>
>>> It will be totally worth the effort just so we can build packages with
>>> npm including FreeTube. I do not think I am familiar enough with guix's
>>> internal programming style and design to do it just now.
>>>
>> Okay. Let's see if anyone else could do it. I also CCd this email
>
>
>> It will be totally worth the effort just so we can build packages with
>> npm including FreeTube. I do not think I am familiar enough with guix's
>> internal programming style and design to do it just now.
>>
> Okay. Let's see if anyone else could do it. I also CCd this email to few
>
> It will be totally worth the effort just so we can build packages with
> npm including FreeTube. I do not think I am familiar enough with guix's
> internal programming style and design to do it just now.
>
Okay. Let's see if anyone else could do it. I also CCd this email to few people
for
On Sat, 15 Jun 2019 22:00:36 +0200 (CEST)
wrote:
> > It looks like freetube uses npm. I don't know if there is an
> > npm-build-system and I cannot find a nodejs or npm package. In
> > order to make FreeTube it looks like we will need to break a lot of
> > ground.
> Ah! Would it be worth it?
> It looks like freetube uses npm. I don't know if there is an
> npm-build-system and I cannot find a nodejs or npm package. In order to
> make FreeTube it looks like we will need to break a lot of ground.
>
Ah! Would it be worth it? Not trying to persuade or anything, but that app
seems to be
> Date: Sat, 15 Jun 2019 17:28:12 +0200 (CEST)
> From:
> To:
> Subject: FreeTube (Re-Post)
> Message-ID:
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
>
> Hi,
>
> I understand that there is youtube-dl and youtube-viewer. But neither
> of them provide a clean UX and features similar to FreeTube. I
Björn Höfling writes:
[...]
> Guix has the youtube-dl package, you can use that directly to download
> the videos and watch them offline.
there's youtube-viewer (also in Guix) I use to watch videos, downloading
them only if desired
we have mps-youtube also
[...]
happy Guix!
--
Giovanni
Björn, Dexter,
Björn Höfling wrote:
I wonder how this gets into FSF directory when there is no way
to
bootstrap that on a free distro.
It hasn't yet:
‘No revision has been approved for this page. View the most
recent revision.’
I presume that'll be the first objection during review, if
On Tue, 30 Apr 2019 20:34:17 +0200
Tobias Geerinckx-Rice wrote:
> Dexter Morgan wrote:
> > OMG! Can someone please please pack this into Guix.
>
> I'd invite you to give it a try yourself, but I have disappointing
> news. NPM programmes are a nightmare to properly package and we
>
Le 30 avril 2019 20:34:17 GMT+02:00, Tobias Geerinckx-Rice a
écrit :
>Dexter Morgan wrote:
>> OMG! Can someone please please pack this into Guix.
>
>I'd invite you to give it a try yourself, but I have disappointing
>news. NPM programmes are a nightmare to properly package and we
>currently
Dexter Morgan wrote:
OMG! Can someone please please pack this into Guix.
I'd invite you to give it a try yourself, but I have disappointing
news. NPM programmes are a nightmare to properly package and we
currently don't even have npm itself in Guix.
And, oh... does this depend on
11 matches
Mail list logo
