Hi Marius,
On 01/27/2018 at 17:03 Marius Bakke writes:
> George myglc2 Clemmer writes:
>
>> It appears that there are 3 ways to reach a QEMU VM desktop on headless
>> GuixSD servers: X11, spice, and maybe VNC. Is that right?
>>
>> Can anyone comment on which has the best performance.
>
> Spice w
George myglc2 Clemmer writes:
> It appears that there are 3 ways to reach a QEMU VM desktop on headless
> GuixSD servers: X11, spice, and maybe VNC. Is that right?
>
> Can anyone comment on which has the best performance.
Spice was designed to be a better protocol than VNC for accessing
virtual
George myglc2 Clemmer writes:
> It appears that there are 3 ways to reach a QEMU VM desktop on headless
> GuixSD servers: X11, spice, and maybe VNC. Is that right?
>
> Can anyone comment on which has the best performance.
>
> My situation: MacOS <-- 1000BaseT --> GuixSD/servers
>
> TIA - George
