> "TBB" == Thomas Bushnell, BSG <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
TBB> Chiaki Ishikawa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
[...]
>> 2. If not, does anyone know how to contact and ask such person(s)
>> to change the mailman config so that the e-mails without proper
>> To:, or Cc: address j
Michele Dalla Silvestra wrote:
>
> On Thu, Dec 20, 2001 at 07:19:51PM +0100, Gerhard Muntingh wrote:
> > On Thu, Dec 20, 2001 at 07:26:56PM +0100, Stefan Karrmann wrote:
> > > Make the non-subscriber mails go to some moderators and send the
> > > subscriber mails directly to the list.
> >
> > Don
On Thu, Dec 20, 2001 at 07:19:51PM +0100, Gerhard Muntingh wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 20, 2001 at 07:26:56PM +0100, Stefan Karrmann wrote:
> > Make the non-subscriber mails go to some moderators and send the
> > subscriber mails directly to the list.
>
> Don't sacrify freedom for safety,
It isn't a fr
Chiaki Ishikawa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> 1. Does anyone who has access to the mailman configuration for this
>mailing list (and other at fsf/gnu site)
>read this discussion?
Not directly.
> 2. If not, does anyone know how to contact and ask such person(s)
>to change the mailma
I am curious about two things. I don't need moderator(s).
1. Does anyone who has access to the mailman configuration for this
mailing list (and other at fsf/gnu site)
read this discussion?
(Not at least for the initial few hours of discussion, I
gather.)
2. If not, does anyone kn
On Thu, Dec 20, 2001 at 07:26:56PM +0100, Stefan Karrmann wrote:
> Make the non-subscriber mails go to some moderators and send the
> subscriber mails directly to the list.
>
I hate that, it's bureaucratic. I just said something similar in
another mail which I regret now.
I do agree though if
On Thu, Dec 20, 2001 at 06:23:20PM +0100, Ottavio Campana wrote:
> If you just use procmail you don't find any solution to all the spam
> emails that travel with this mailing list. Everyone has first to
> download the mails and then to kill them. Wouldn't it be easier and more
> effici
Make the non-subscriber mails go to some moderators and send the
subscriber mails directly to the list.
--
Stefan Karrmann
Satire does not look pretty upon a tombstone.
___
Help-hurd mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinf
On Thu, 20 Dec 2001 17:43:12 +0100
Marcus Brinkmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have spent more time in my life reading (and sometimes participating) in
> discussions about spam on mailing lists than I spent deleting the spam :)
>
Good point. :)
Being more or less a 'calm lurker' on this li
On 20011220T182320+0100, Ottavio Campana wrote:
> Wouldn't it be easier and more
> efficient to stop them directly at the source?
Yes. However, /dev/nulling them at the list robot does not do that.
Only complaining about spam does that - and for that you need to get
a copy of it.
--
Antti-Juha
On Thu, Dec 20, 2001 at 11:20:56AM +0100, Neal H Walfield wrote:
> Personally, I think this is all absolutely silly: first off, an
> X-RBL-Warning header is added to all mail coming from gnu.org lists
> that are sent from an open relay. I send all of this mail directly to
> /dev/null. I also rej
On Thu, Dec 20, 2001 at 08:53:46AM -0200, Bruno A. C. Ferreira wrote:
> I think much of this spam comes from non members. So, a primary action to
> avoid spam should be to enable the option "member_posting_only" (This list is
> managed by Mailman, right?).
This is a help channel. I don't want
On Thu, 2001-12-20 at 15:38, Michele Dalla Silvestra wrote:
> Moderators can be more than one person, and is very simple to manage. With 3
> or 4 moderators, some unlucky messages can be a delay minor than 24 h.
But that's a long delay for a discussion list. Blocking mail with
implicit destinatio
On Thu, Dec 20, 2001 at 08:53:46AM -0200, Bruno A. C. Ferreira wrote:
> I think much of this spam comes from non members. So, a primary action to
> avoid spam should be to enable the option "member_posting_only" (This list is
> managed by Mailman, right?).
Apart from using procmail in every cl
X-PMC-CI-e-mail-id: 17323
>However, setting mailman to require explicit recipients is a Good
>Thing - there is no problem with this: The ML is public anyway and a
>Bcc to the list is therefore silly. Most spam gets filtered our with
>this rule.
So who is going to perform this modification?
On Thu, 20 Dec 2001 11:20:56 +0100, Neal H Walfield said:
> Personally, I think this is all absolutely silly: first off, an
> X-RBL-Warning header is added to all mail coming from gnu.org lists
This works perfectly. The uk-crypto ML uses the same, well I have to
allow a few poster which are som
I think much of this spam comes from non members. So, a primary action to
avoid spam should be to enable the option "member_posting_only" (This list is
managed by Mailman, right?).
But if this option is already enabled (and the spammers are the members), I
agree that this list should be moder
> > I subscribe to this list. I'm getting a bit exasperated by the large
>> amount of spam which occurs.
>>
>> Can the list be moderated? If no one else is willing, I'd be willing
>> to volunteer, if it were possible for me to act as moderator.
>
> You're right! I think that the list should be mo
On Wed, Dec 19, 2001 at 11:34:16PM +, Bob Wilkinson wrote:
> I subscribe to this list. I'm getting a bit exasperated by the large
> amount of spam which occurs.
>
> Can the list be moderated? If no one else is willing, I'd be willing
> to volunteer, if it were possible for me to act as modera
On Thu, 2001-12-20 at 00:34, Bob Wilkinson wrote:
> Can the list be moderated? If no one else is willing, I'd be willing
> to volunteer, if it were possible for me to act as moderator.
Most of the spam has implicit destination, and this list is powered by
mailman, which has a feature to reject th
On Thu, Dec 06, 2001 at 03:06:03AM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
>
> Today's Topics:
>
>1. TELECOM GEAR Blowout! 11940 ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
>2. SHCC: National Sales Expansion Position Company for Rapid
>Growth XF ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
>
I subscribe to t
21 matches
Mail list logo
