> * QA Notice: Package has poor programming practices which may compile
> * fine but exhibit random runtime failures.
> * gstGlut.c:391: warning: implicit declaration of function ‘glutWMCloseFunc’
I'll look at it.
Paolo
___
help-smalltalk mailing list
> Looks like something happened. Some time after I made that post a
> reaction came to my old topic. Looks like they lifted the hard-mask. Now
> it's time to test and deliver results in less than 30 days so it can go
> stable again. Here's the topic
> http://forums.gentoo.org/viewtopic.php?p=62723
I'm afraid, you're wrong: http://www.gentoo-portage.com/dev-lang/gnu-smalltalk
It's in, and you only need to have the testing branch.
Martin
On Saturday 08 May 2010 17:12:48 you wrote:
> Yes, but currently eix says the latest (masked) ebuild you can get is
> 3.1 I'm using 3.2 compiled from sou
On Saturday 08 May 2010 13:11:21 you wrote: > "make test" show do it.
>
> BTW, I'm serving an iliad app from a gentoo hardened server with no
> probs at all.
>
> Bèrto
Thanks, that got me into the right direction:
FEATURES="test" emerge gnu-smalltalk
includes the test phase during installati
On 05/08/2010 06:57 PM, Martin Beck wrote:
> Hi,
> I installed gst on gentoo and shortly fired up gst-browser. Seems to work
> fine,
> however, is there some kind of test packages I could start up to test it more
> thouroughly?
> I do not use gst very often, so I don't have any code to test.
"make test" show do it.
BTW, I'm serving an iliad app from a gentoo hardened server with no
probs at all.
Bèrto
--
==
Constitution du 24 juin 1793 - Article 35. - Quand le gouvernement
viole les droits du peuple, l'insurrection est, pour le peuple et pour
chaque port
On Friday 07 May 2010 15:24:51 you wrote: > On 05/07/2010 02:21 AM, Holger
Hans Peter Freyther wrote:
> >>> Figured out the e-mail address of somebody who might be a maintainer.
> >>> It's the only e-mail I found. Send an e-mail flying in that general
> >>> direction. Let's see if I get an answer
On 05/07/2010 02:21 AM, Holger Hans Peter Freyther wrote:
>
>>> Figured out the e-mail address of somebody who might be a maintainer.
>>> It's the only e-mail I found. Send an e-mail flying in that general
>>> direction. Let's see if I get an answer in one form or the other.
>>>
>>>
>> Figured out the e-mail address of somebody who might be a maintainer.
>> It's the only e-mail I found. Send an e-mail flying in that general
>> direction. Let's see if I get an answer in one form or the other.
>>
> No reply so far. Looks like we have a case of dead-ear behavior. Looks
> like
On 05/04/2010 10:40 PM, Roland Plüss wrote:
>
> On 05/04/2010 03:52 PM, Roland Plüss wrote:
>
>> On 05/03/2010 03:58 PM, Holger Hans Peter Freyther wrote:
>>
>>
>>> On 05/03/2010 09:51 PM, Roland Plüss wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
Tried posting in the forum but nobody see
On 05/04/2010 03:52 PM, Roland Plüss wrote:
>
> On 05/03/2010 03:58 PM, Holger Hans Peter Freyther wrote:
>
>> On 05/03/2010 09:51 PM, Roland Plüss wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>> Tried posting in the forum but nobody seems to care. Anybody has the
>>> e-mail of the maintainer? This is really piss
On 05/04/2010 08:50 PM, Bèrto ëd Sèra wrote:
> What about making an overlay for gst? So we can manage it ourselves
> and they can rely on us without giving us the keys to the main engine
> :) I can volunteer space and hopefully some work in the next weeks,
> too.
>
> Bèrto
>
> On 4 May 2010 16:52
On 05/03/2010 03:58 PM, Holger Hans Peter Freyther wrote:
> On 05/03/2010 09:51 PM, Roland Plüss wrote:
>
>
>> Tried posting in the forum but nobody seems to care. Anybody has the
>> e-mail of the maintainer? This is really pissing me off to drop
>> gnu-smalltalk just like a hot potato. GenToo
Also on OSX you should have to compile it in 32 bit arch.
Make sure you have all the dependency also compile in 32 but.
Using macport just edit the file /opt/local/etc/macports/macports.conf
and uncomment the line:
build_arch i386
You may also face the bug
https://trac.macpo
On 05/03/2010 09:51 PM, Roland Plüss wrote:
> Tried posting in the forum but nobody seems to care. Anybody has the
> e-mail of the maintainer? This is really pissing me off to drop
> gnu-smalltalk just like a hot potato. GenToo really went down the drain
> in the last years <.=.<
Well, have you
On 05/02/2010 07:29 PM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> On Sun, May 2, 2010 at 15:32, Roland Plüss wrote:
>
>>
>> On 05/02/2010 10:14 AM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>>
>>> GNU Smalltalk 3.2 has been released at (...)
>>>
>> Anybody in contact with GenToo? The smalltalk ebuild got masked because
On Sun, May 2, 2010 at 15:32, Roland Plüss wrote:
>
>
> On 05/02/2010 10:14 AM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>> GNU Smalltalk 3.2 has been released at (...)
> Anybody in contact with GenToo? The smalltalk ebuild got masked because
> of the libtool issue. With the new version it should be compatible
> aga
On 05/02/2010 10:14 AM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> GNU Smalltalk 3.2 has been released at (...)
Anybody in contact with GenToo? The smalltalk ebuild got masked because
of the libtool issue. With the new version it should be compatible
again. Would be nice to get it back in portage.
--
Yours sincer
Cool!
Congrats to you and gwen for this awesome release :)
Nico
signature.asc
Description: Ceci est une partie de message numériquement signée
___
help-smalltalk mailing list
help-smalltalk@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/help-smalltalk
On 05/02/2010 01:19 PM, glpu...@lordzealon.com wrote:
Congratulations to all for the great great work!
Some days ago, I tried under osx:
Autoreconf -vi
./configure
Make
Make install
But I can't see gst-browser
I'm missing something?
It means that you're lacking some of the prerequisites. GT
On 5/2/2010 11:14 AM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
GNU Smalltalk 3.2 has been released at
Congratulations!
* Mostly rewritten Windows port. It should mostly work except for
sockets (the socket code will likely be rewritten for all platforms
for 3.3 anyway). An experimental installer will be made a
On 05/02/2010 06:00 PM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> On 05/02/2010 11:29 AM, Holger Hans Peter Freyther wrote:
>> On 05/02/2010 04:37 PM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> Is preemptive mode broken?
>>
>> make check is failing in the Process test.
>
> Ah, I guess that's kind of expected since that test re
On 05/02/2010 11:29 AM, Holger Hans Peter Freyther wrote:
On 05/02/2010 04:37 PM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
Is preemptive mode broken?
make check is failing in the Process test.
Ah, I guess that's kind of expected since that test relies on knowledge
of the exact scheduling order. I guess I ca
On 05/02/2010 04:37 PM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>
> Is preemptive mode broken?
make check is failing in the Process test.
___
help-smalltalk mailing list
help-smalltalk@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/help-smalltalk
Hello,
Le 02/05/2010 10:14, Paolo Bonzini a écrit :
GNU Smalltalk 3.2 has been released at
Congrats!
A quick:
./configure ; make; make check ; make install
then:
$PREFIX/bin/gst-browser
is really worth a try.
I'm going to package this ASAP.
Kudos to Gwenaël and everyone involved in thi
On 05/02/2010 10:35 AM, Holger Hans Peter Freyther wrote:
On 05/02/2010 04:14 PM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
GNU Smalltalk 3.2 has been released at
Congratulation! Are there any plans for GNU Smalltalk 3.3?
I would like to use more of glib and integrate the event loop in the VM.
I have not plann
On 05/02/2010 04:14 PM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> GNU Smalltalk 3.2 has been released at
Congratulation! Are there any plans for GNU Smalltalk 3.3? Would
enabling the JIT for x86, fixing the pre-emptive mode or porting more
Software worthwhile goals?
___
GNU Smalltalk 3.2 has been released at
* ftp://ftp.gnu.org/gnu/smalltalk/smalltalk-3.2.tar.gz
SHA1 checksum: d951714c4fc7d91d06bdc33c20905885e5d2b25f
* ftp://ftp.gnu.org/gnu/smalltalk/smalltalk-3.2.tar.xz
SHA1 checksum: 1ff71bf0be7e238eba9485eb6a016bc4faa07cea
Main features of the new relea
28 matches
Mail list logo
