On Mon, Nov 28, 2016 at 04:21:27PM +, Gavin Smith wrote:
> On 27 November 2016 at 20:27, Gavin Smith wrote:
> > On second thoughts, this is already possible. The best way at the
> > moment, I think, to underline text would be to output strings in the
> > output like
On 27 November 2016 at 20:27, Gavin Smith wrote:
> On second thoughts, this is already possible. The best way at the
> moment, I think, to underline text would be to output strings in the
> output like this:
>
> this text isn't underlined UNDERLINE_ONbut this text