On Sat, Nov 14, 2020 at 06:26:07PM +0100, Christopher Dimech wrote:
> Still for productivity's sake, output is better than no output.
> This is especially important for large works, where the author
> does not want complete failure because of some inconsistency.
It really depends. In particular
trice Dumas" , "Christopher Dimech"
> , "help-texinfo gnu"
> Subject: Re: Failure in html output - Reference to nonexistent nodes
>
> On Sat, Nov 14, 2020 at 04:09:14PM +0100, Patrice Dumas wrote:
> > On Sat, Nov 14, 2020 at 03:13:27PM +0100, Christopher
On Sat, Nov 14, 2020 at 04:09:14PM +0100, Patrice Dumas wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 14, 2020 at 03:13:27PM +0100, Christopher Dimech wrote:
> > Some time ago I discussed the problem that calling a reference
> > to a nonexistent node when generating .info files.
> >
> > When outputting html, reference to
be used for strict checking.
> Sent: Saturday, November 14, 2020 at 4:09 PM
> From: "Patrice Dumas"
> To: "Christopher Dimech"
> Cc: "help-texinfo gnu" , "Gavin Smith"
>
> Subject: Re: Failure in html output - Reference to none
On Sat, Nov 14, 2020 at 03:13:27PM +0100, Christopher Dimech wrote:
> Some time ago I discussed the problem that calling a reference
> to a nonexistent node when generating .info files.
>
> When outputting html, reference to nonexistent node also gives a
> problem.
>
> @ref reference to
Some time ago I discussed the problem that calling a reference
to a nonexistent node when generating .info files.
When outputting html, reference to nonexistent node also gives a
problem.
@ref reference to nonexistent node `igc03--Sicl--CircAmRg'
Problem is aggravated because the failure