Re: Compiled Slug size not changing after removing large gems from Gemfile
Hi Stephen, If you checked in a gem into git Then you deleted the gem from git. Git still has the gem. It is not showing up for today, but git log will show when you added it and removed it. Guess I do not know if you are checking in your bundle dir and gems into git. 1. So are you saying your repo is 17mb, or your slug is 17mb? I'd imagine that the slug would be smaller on your change to the Gemfile. But you stating that your slug is big suggests that maybe the .git directory is included in the slug? The slug size does affect the speed in which a dyno is started / compiles / restarts. But I agree with Chris, I can't imagine it would slow it down too much. --Keenan On Oct 12, 2010, at 12:48 AM, Chris Hanks wrote: Yeah, this has happened to me before, too. I'm pretty sure the problem is on Heroku's end. I don't worry that much about it, though, since the max slug size is 100 MB. On Oct 11, 8:57 pm, stephen murdoch stephenjamesmurd...@gmail.com wrote: I have encountered a few strange problems with Heroku this evening. My repo size somehow managed to bloat to 17mb so I removed some gems from my Gemfile (ran bundle install, git add Gemfile.lock etc etc) and found that my repo was still 17mb. I removed all my gems (apart from rails and pg) and the repo didn't get any smaller. My app is no bigger than 2mb. So I deleted my app (along with my .git and .bundle directories) and created everything from scratch. This seemed to fix the problem, until just now, when I tried to remove 4 large gems from my Gemfile and didn't see any change in the size of my compiled slug on Heroku. Is this something that other people are experiencing? FWIW, I've tried everything I can think of, including removing Gemfile.lock, .bundle etc etc -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Heroku group. To post to this group, send email to her...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to heroku+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/heroku?hl=en. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Heroku group. To post to this group, send email to her...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to heroku+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/heroku?hl=en.
Re: Compiled Slug size not changing after removing large gems from Gemfile
According to the Heroku docs (http://docs.heroku.com/slug-compiler), the git repository is not included in the slug. I've had the same experience as Stephen - I'd specify gems in my Gemfile that would push the slug size up, and then remove them without any effect to the slug size. Then I could destroy the app, create a new one from the same git repository and wind up with a smaller slug size than I'd had before. On Oct 11, 11:52 pm, Keenan Brock kee...@thebrocks.net wrote: Hi Stephen, If you checked in a gem into git Then you deleted the gem from git. Git still has the gem. It is not showing up for today, but git log will show when you added it and removed it. Guess I do not know if you are checking in your bundle dir and gems into git. 1. So are you saying your repo is 17mb, or your slug is 17mb? I'd imagine that the slug would be smaller on your change to the Gemfile. But you stating that your slug is big suggests that maybe the .git directory is included in the slug? The slug size does affect the speed in which a dyno is started / compiles / restarts. But I agree with Chris, I can't imagine it would slow it down too much. --Keenan On Oct 12, 2010, at 12:48 AM, Chris Hanks wrote: Yeah, this has happened to me before, too. I'm pretty sure the problem is on Heroku's end. I don't worry that much about it, though, since the max slug size is 100 MB. On Oct 11, 8:57 pm, stephen murdoch stephenjamesmurd...@gmail.com wrote: I have encountered a few strange problems with Heroku this evening. My repo size somehow managed to bloat to 17mb so I removed some gems from my Gemfile (ran bundle install, git add Gemfile.lock etc etc) and found that my repo was still 17mb. I removed all my gems (apart from rails and pg) and the repo didn't get any smaller. My app is no bigger than 2mb. So I deleted my app (along with my .git and .bundle directories) and created everything from scratch. This seemed to fix the problem, until just now, when I tried to remove 4 large gems from my Gemfile and didn't see any change in the size of my compiled slug on Heroku. Is this something that other people are experiencing? FWIW, I've tried everything I can think of, including removing Gemfile.lock, .bundle etc etc -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Heroku group. To post to this group, send email to her...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to heroku+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group athttp://groups.google.com/group/heroku?hl=en. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Heroku group. To post to this group, send email to her...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to heroku+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/heroku?hl=en.
how video +18??
how video +18??[1] Links: -- [1] http://bit.ly/bcvaFf -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Heroku group. To post to this group, send email to her...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to heroku+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/heroku?hl=en.
Re: Koi (how variable is variable?) vs. Ronin (expensive!) vs. Amazon RDS (winner?)
Thanks Chris - that's great to know that you're handling that much traffic w/ only 2 dynos and Koi. I have highly cachable content as well, and plan on aggressively using varnish, as well as caches_page behind that, and then rendering user specific partials (welcome back username) w/ ajax (sounds like you're doing the same). I haven't turned all that on yet, b/c I want to really exercise the full end-to- end under some load first. With Koi, are your New Relic DB throughput and response time numbers pretty consistent? What is the variance that you're seeing in terms of database response time for the same queries? Any sign of timeouts caused by a slow DB response? And I wonder if anyone else out there has had success w/ Amazon RDS? The long-term pricing to get dedicated database is very attractive, and I'm more familiar w/ MySQL that PostGreSQL m p.s. As an aside, I am surprised by how little activity this group gets? Latest home page on heroku said there are 90,000+ apps running on the platform...but like 3 messages posted a day. Kinda weird? Implies that either a) people are just using the free hello world version, or b) it's just that damn easy that nobody is hitting issues :) On Oct 7, 11:39 pm, chris mcclellan...@gmail.com wrote: It really depends a lot on how well you leverage caching. We run a ~1.5mil page views / month site on heroku with just two (2!) dynos and koi. But our pages are cached for ~3 hours via varnish, which heroku provides for free. All users see (essentially) the same version of the site, barring JS-driven login/logout links, and certain admin functionality. One thing you should keep in mind is that amazon RDS is mysql based and heroku runs postgres DBs. On Oct 7, 10:42 pm, mattsly matt...@gmail.com wrote: I really want to pull the trigger with Heroku. I love so much of it. I'm looking to move over a ~500K page views/month site that is decently data intensive, and still weighing my options wrt database, which may make or break my decision to use Heroku vs. EY, etc, given the price differences. Koi seems like a great deal. 20 GB is plenty for my app. My benchmarks so far seem promising. But variable performance has me concerned a bit...does anyone have more concrete numbers on just what that means? Anyone running decently high traffic sites on just Koi? The jump to Ronin is obviously dramatic in terms of price. Is there any more info on just what a compute unit is? Like RAM and I/O specs? It seems to me, given EC2 prices (small ec2 is ~85/month variable, and large = ~910/year term $100/month), that there should be a dedicated option for less than $200/month. Any hints of a Koi- like price drop in the near future here? My 2 cents to Heroku's pricing team would be treat the data layer as a break-even loss leader, and make up the revenue on the dyno/worker side... Amazon RDS seems like quite possibly the way to go. 3 year term for a small instance (1.7 GB) is $350 2 months of the cost of a Ronin instance! Has anyone gone this route and had success? Should I be worried about latency between Heroku and RDS? (it's all EC2, right?) Which zone should I have a DB placed in? (Virginia vs. California?) m -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Heroku group. To post to this group, send email to her...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to heroku+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/heroku?hl=en.
Re: Compiled Slug size not changing after removing large gems from Gemfile
I was actually going to write support about this issue for my app, but I ll try here first the slug size of my app has slowly been increasing after each commit, now up to 73Mb. This is definitely not a big application, so I believe something wrong is happening. Could easily be my fault, off course. as heroku mentions here http://docs.heroku.com/slug-compiler, if I want to try and estimate the slugsize of my app, I do a fresh clone of the rep, delete the .git dir, and a du -hsc shows me 23Mb. big difference. on top of that, if I also delete directories mentionned in my .slugignore, it gets down to 6Mb. so I dont understand why there is such a difference. Could it be from the gemfile? Mine looks like this: (I dont think there is that many dependencies) source :gemcutter gem 'rails', '3.0.0' gem 'pg' gem 'awesome_print', '0.2.0' gem 'aws-s3' gem 'devise', '1.1.1' gem 'delayed_job' gem 'formtastic', '~ 1.1.0' gem 'haml' gem 'heroku-autoscale' gem 'hoptoad_notifier','2.3.6' gem 'memcached-northscale', '0.19.5.3' gem 'nokogiri' gem 'oauth' gem 'recurly' gem 'sunspot', '1.2rc2'#, :require = 'sunspot' gem 'sunspot_rails', '1.2rc2'#, :git = ' http://github.com/outoftime/sunspot.git'#, :branch = v1.2 gem 'will_paginate', :git = git://github.com/mislav/will_paginate.git, :branch = rails3 gem 'warden', '0.10.7' group :development do # looks like removing them can free 5-6 Mo of slug size gem 'compass', '= 0.10.2' gem 'ruby-debug', '0.10.3' gem yui-compressor gem 'closure-compiler' gem 'heroku' gem 'heroku_san' end anyone has any idea how to reduce it? I feel I could easily get stuck in 6-8 weeks where I could reach the 100Mb limit. 2010/10/12 Chris Hanks christopher.m.ha...@gmail.com According to the Heroku docs (http://docs.heroku.com/slug-compiler), the git repository is not included in the slug. I've had the same experience as Stephen - I'd specify gems in my Gemfile that would push the slug size up, and then remove them without any effect to the slug size. Then I could destroy the app, create a new one from the same git repository and wind up with a smaller slug size than I'd had before. On Oct 11, 11:52 pm, Keenan Brock kee...@thebrocks.net wrote: Hi Stephen, If you checked in a gem into git Then you deleted the gem from git. Git still has the gem. It is not showing up for today, but git log will show when you added it and removed it. Guess I do not know if you are checking in your bundle dir and gems into git. 1. So are you saying your repo is 17mb, or your slug is 17mb? I'd imagine that the slug would be smaller on your change to the Gemfile. But you stating that your slug is big suggests that maybe the .git directory is included in the slug? The slug size does affect the speed in which a dyno is started / compiles / restarts. But I agree with Chris, I can't imagine it would slow it down too much. --Keenan On Oct 12, 2010, at 12:48 AM, Chris Hanks wrote: Yeah, this has happened to me before, too. I'm pretty sure the problem is on Heroku's end. I don't worry that much about it, though, since the max slug size is 100 MB. On Oct 11, 8:57 pm, stephen murdoch stephenjamesmurd...@gmail.com wrote: I have encountered a few strange problems with Heroku this evening. My repo size somehow managed to bloat to 17mb so I removed some gems from my Gemfile (ran bundle install, git add Gemfile.lock etc etc) and found that my repo was still 17mb. I removed all my gems (apart from rails and pg) and the repo didn't get any smaller. My app is no bigger than 2mb. So I deleted my app (along with my .git and .bundle directories) and created everything from scratch. This seemed to fix the problem, until just now, when I tried to remove 4 large gems from my Gemfile and didn't see any change in the size of my compiled slug on Heroku. Is this something that other people are experiencing? FWIW, I've tried everything I can think of, including removing Gemfile.lock, .bundle etc etc -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Heroku group. To post to this group, send email to her...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to heroku+unsubscr...@googlegroups.comheroku%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups.com . For more options, visit this group athttp:// groups.google.com/group/heroku?hl=en. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Heroku group. To post to this group, send email to her...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to heroku+unsubscr...@googlegroups.comheroku%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups.com . For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/heroku?hl=en. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Heroku group. To post to this group, send email to her...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this
Re: Add SSH Key to Heroku (using Windows/Cygwin)
I followed their guide but it unfortunaltely didn't work for me. I have a SSH-Key and it seems to work (I used it for opening a github- Account). The problems start when I enter the following: $ heroku or $ heroku keys:add This results in the error message seen above. My guess is that it's some problem specific to cygwin/windows but I'm not sure. Twiek On Oct 11, 11:24 pm, Abel Tamayo abel.tam...@gmail.com wrote: I would recommend that you follow Heroku's guide here:http://docs.heroku.com/keys http://docs.heroku.com/keysMaybe you don't have installed ssh. Let us know how that goes and I hope that helps. Abel. On Mon, Oct 11, 2010 at 6:36 PM, Twiek sebastian.schwiec...@googlemail.comwrote: Beeing new to programming I'm trying to learn RoR using railstutorial.org and ran into a problem in chapter 1.4.1 (http:// railstutorial.org/book#sec:1.4.1). When trying to add my SSH key to Heroku the following happend: ba...@basti-pc ~ $ heroku keys:add internal:lib/rubygems/custom_require:29:in `require': no such file to load -- readline (LoadError) from internal:lib/rubygems/custom_require:29:in `require' from /usr/local/lib/ruby/gems/1.9.1/gems/heroku-1.10.14/lib/ heroku/comma nds/app.rb:1:in `top (required)' from internal:lib/rubygems/custom_require:29:in `require' from internal:lib/rubygems/custom_require:29:in `require' from /usr/local/lib/ruby/gems/1.9.1/gems/heroku-1.10.14/lib/ heroku/comma nd.rb:5:in `block in top (required)' from /usr/local/lib/ruby/gems/1.9.1/gems/heroku-1.10.14/lib/ heroku/comma nd.rb:5:in `each' from /usr/local/lib/ruby/gems/1.9.1/gems/heroku-1.10.14/lib/ heroku/comma nd.rb:5:in `top (required)' from internal:lib/rubygems/custom_require:29:in `require' from internal:lib/rubygems/custom_require:29:in `require' from /usr/local/lib/ruby/gems/1.9.1/gems/heroku-1.10.14/bin/ heroku:7:in `top (required)' from /usr/local/bin/heroku:19:in `load' from /usr/local/bin/heroku:19:in `main' I'm running Windows Vista using Cygwin. I have installed ruby-1.9.2-p0 and Rails 3.0.0. I tried to find a answer elsewhere using google but wasn't able, Nevertheles any link helping out would be appreciated as well. Thanks in advance, Twiek -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Heroku group. To post to this group, send email to her...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to heroku+unsubscr...@googlegroups.comheroku%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups.com . For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/heroku?hl=en. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Heroku group. To post to this group, send email to her...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to heroku+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/heroku?hl=en.
Re: Add SSH Key to Heroku (using Windows/Cygwin)
I don't think many are using Windows with Rails here. Maybe you should try dual booting with Linux. The new Ubuntu came out just this weekend and you won't regret the switch ;) On Tue, Oct 12, 2010 at 4:19 PM, Twiek sebastian.schwiec...@googlemail.comwrote: I followed their guide but it unfortunaltely didn't work for me. I have a SSH-Key and it seems to work (I used it for opening a github- Account). The problems start when I enter the following: $ heroku or $ heroku keys:add This results in the error message seen above. My guess is that it's some problem specific to cygwin/windows but I'm not sure. Twiek On Oct 11, 11:24 pm, Abel Tamayo abel.tam...@gmail.com wrote: I would recommend that you follow Heroku's guide here: http://docs.heroku.com/keys http://docs.heroku.com/keysMaybe you don't have installed ssh. Let us know how that goes and I hope that helps. Abel. On Mon, Oct 11, 2010 at 6:36 PM, Twiek sebastian.schwiec...@googlemail.comwrote: Beeing new to programming I'm trying to learn RoR using railstutorial.org and ran into a problem in chapter 1.4.1 (http:// railstutorial.org/book#sec:1.4.1). When trying to add my SSH key to Heroku the following happend: ba...@basti-pc ~ $ heroku keys:add internal:lib/rubygems/custom_require:29:in `require': no such file to load -- readline (LoadError) from internal:lib/rubygems/custom_require:29:in `require' from /usr/local/lib/ruby/gems/1.9.1/gems/heroku-1.10.14/lib/ heroku/comma nds/app.rb:1:in `top (required)' from internal:lib/rubygems/custom_require:29:in `require' from internal:lib/rubygems/custom_require:29:in `require' from /usr/local/lib/ruby/gems/1.9.1/gems/heroku-1.10.14/lib/ heroku/comma nd.rb:5:in `block in top (required)' from /usr/local/lib/ruby/gems/1.9.1/gems/heroku-1.10.14/lib/ heroku/comma nd.rb:5:in `each' from /usr/local/lib/ruby/gems/1.9.1/gems/heroku-1.10.14/lib/ heroku/comma nd.rb:5:in `top (required)' from internal:lib/rubygems/custom_require:29:in `require' from internal:lib/rubygems/custom_require:29:in `require' from /usr/local/lib/ruby/gems/1.9.1/gems/heroku-1.10.14/bin/ heroku:7:in `top (required)' from /usr/local/bin/heroku:19:in `load' from /usr/local/bin/heroku:19:in `main' I'm running Windows Vista using Cygwin. I have installed ruby-1.9.2-p0 and Rails 3.0.0. I tried to find a answer elsewhere using google but wasn't able, Nevertheles any link helping out would be appreciated as well. Thanks in advance, Twiek -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Heroku group. To post to this group, send email to her...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to heroku+unsubscr...@googlegroups.comheroku%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups.com heroku%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups.comheroku%252bunsubscr...@googlegroups.com . For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/heroku?hl=en. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Heroku group. To post to this group, send email to her...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to heroku+unsubscr...@googlegroups.comheroku%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups.com . For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/heroku?hl=en. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Heroku group. To post to this group, send email to her...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to heroku+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/heroku?hl=en.
Re: Compiled Slug size not changing after removing large gems from Gemfile
I discovered something similar about a month ago. I dug around the directory structure using heroku console, and noticed that the deleted gems still existed in the slug's .bundle folder. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Heroku group. To post to this group, send email to her...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to heroku+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/heroku?hl=en.
Re: Dogpile effect with Varnish?
Hi Ben, Any update about this? Thanks, Thomas. On Tue, Oct 5, 2010 at 8:33 PM, Thomas Balthazar gro...@suitmymind.com wrote: Hello Ben, I just read you were about to talk to the Varnish specialist at Heroku. I would really appreciate if you took the time to help me to find the answer to those 2 unanswered questions about Varnish and caching : http://groups.google.com/group/heroku/browse_thread/thread/8e39658d53c53b7c http://groups.google.com/group/heroku/browse_thread/thread/fd23e886c24131b3 Thanks in advance for your help! Thomas. On Tue, Oct 5, 2010 at 7:52 PM, Ben Scofield b...@heroku.com wrote: Not sure why this didn't come through earlier, but: I tried out a few experiments, and it looks like our setup doesn't interfere with this default behavior. I'm going to talk to someone with more intimate knowledge of our Varnish config to confirm that, but so far it looks promising. Ben On Oct 5, 12:00 pm, Chris Hanks christopher.m.ha...@gmail.com wrote: Is anyone from Heroku around that might know how their setup works? On Oct 2, 8:42 pm, Chris Hanks christopher.m.ha...@gmail.com wrote: I'm wondering about Heroku's use of Varnish. Suppose I have a page that is expensive to produce (lots of database queries) but can be cached in Varnish. Right after Varnish's copy expires, if it's very popular, I might have a dozen people accessing it simultaneously before the newly created version can be stashed in Varnish. So, based on a thread I found (http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/ varnish/misc/14750) it looks like Varnish is smart enough by default to only send that expensive request to my backend once, and serve up the response to all the people waiting for it (to prevent a dogpiling effect). But I know that Heroku has its own configuration for Varnish (with lots of servers in a hash ring), and I was wondering whether it's still set up to do this. Thanks! -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Heroku group. To post to this group, send email to her...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to heroku+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/heroku?hl=en. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Heroku group. To post to this group, send email to her...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to heroku+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/heroku?hl=en.
Re: You have modified your Gemfile in development but did not check the resulting snapshot (Gemfile.lock) into version control
thank you so much :) i had no idea you could do this and it works perfectly! On Oct 12, 5:44 am, Chris Hanks christopher.m.ha...@gmail.com wrote: First, to prevent Heroku from installing certain gems, use the BUNDLE_WITHOUT config var to specify groups you want to skip. For example, I do: heroku config:add BUNDLE_WITHOUT=development test Then, in my Gemfile: source :rubygems gem 'rails', '3.0.0' group :development, :test do gem 'rspec-rails', '2.0.0' # etc... end Now Heroku won't install any of the rspec gems. Second, try running bundle update after updating a gem in the Gemfile, and it will recalculate all your dependencies and update your Gemfile.lock for you. What's even better, though, is to only update gems you specify - for example, run bundle update rails if you change the rails version in your Gemfile. That way, Bundler will only update the things it really needs to, which is safer. On Oct 11, 9:09 pm, stephen murdoch stephenjamesmurd...@gmail.com wrote: I get this error message every now and then: You have modified your Gemfile in development but did not check the resulting snapshot (Gemfile.lock) into version control Most people suggest removing the .bundle directory and running bundle install again making sure to add Gemfile.lock to the git repo before committing and pushing to heroku but that doesn't always resolve the problem. The easiest way to fix this is by removing Gemfile.lock and pushing to heroku without it. Heroku then bundles your gems for you, but informs you that you will soon be required to include a Gemfile.lock. I am trying to get my head round this problem. Can anyone tell my why this happens? I have on occasions tried wrapping certain gems in my Gemfile within and 'if statement' to prevent heroku from installing them as I only want them on my dev box. The error only seems to happen in apps that I've used this technique. Perhaps this is the source of these problems? When will Heroku start requiring you to add a Gemfile.lock and what are the best ways of preventing this problem? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Heroku group. To post to this group, send email to her...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to heroku+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/heroku?hl=en.
Re: Compiled Slug size not changing after removing large gems from Gemfile
yes Keenan, it's definitely my slug size that's creeping up (same problem others are having) I did some digging and this is what I found: According to the command-line output, my bundle is getting installed to `.bundle/gems`. I decided to try and vendor my gems to see if this would make a difference. Firstly, I downloaded the source for the compass gem and stuck in my vendor/gems directory. Then in Gemfile I pointed to the vendored version like so: gem 'compass', :path = File.join(File.dirname(__FILE__), '/vendor/ gems/compass') I ran bundler again and pushed to heroku and watched the gem install and the slug increase in size. Then I removed the gem from my vendor directory, bundled and pushed to heroku again, and this time, the slug size decreased! So a possible fix for this problem might be to just vendor all gems until it's sorted out. Can't say that i've tested this out thoroughly but will give it a shot tonight when I have time just to be certain. On Oct 12, 7:52 am, Keenan Brock kee...@thebrocks.net wrote: Hi Stephen, If you checked in a gem into git Then you deleted the gem from git. Git still has the gem. It is not showing up for today, but git log will show when you added it and removed it. Guess I do not know if you are checking in your bundle dir and gems into git. 1. So are you saying your repo is 17mb, or your slug is 17mb? I'd imagine that the slug would be smaller on your change to the Gemfile. But you stating that your slug is big suggests that maybe the .git directory is included in the slug? The slug size does affect the speed in which a dyno is started / compiles / restarts. But I agree with Chris, I can't imagine it would slow it down too much. --Keenan On Oct 12, 2010, at 12:48 AM, Chris Hanks wrote: Yeah, this has happened to me before, too. I'm pretty sure the problem is on Heroku's end. I don't worry that much about it, though, since the max slug size is 100 MB. On Oct 11, 8:57 pm, stephen murdoch stephenjamesmurd...@gmail.com wrote: I have encountered a few strange problems with Heroku this evening. My repo size somehow managed to bloat to 17mb so I removed some gems from my Gemfile (ran bundle install, git add Gemfile.lock etc etc) and found that my repo was still 17mb. I removed all my gems (apart from rails and pg) and the repo didn't get any smaller. My app is no bigger than 2mb. So I deleted my app (along with my .git and .bundle directories) and created everything from scratch. This seemed to fix the problem, until just now, when I tried to remove 4 large gems from my Gemfile and didn't see any change in the size of my compiled slug on Heroku. Is this something that other people are experiencing? FWIW, I've tried everything I can think of, including removing Gemfile.lock, .bundle etc etc -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Heroku group. To post to this group, send email to her...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to heroku+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group athttp://groups.google.com/group/heroku?hl=en. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Heroku group. To post to this group, send email to her...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to heroku+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/heroku?hl=en.
Re: Add SSH Key to Heroku (using Windows/Cygwin)
On Oct 11, 2010, at 7:36 PM, Twiek wrote: Beeing new to programming I'm trying to learn RoR using railstutorial.org and ran into a problem in chapter 1.4.1 (http:// railstutorial.org/book#sec:1.4.1). When trying to add my SSH key to Heroku the following happend: ba...@basti-pc ~ $ heroku keys:add internal:lib/rubygems/custom_require:29:in `require': no such file to load -- readline (LoadError) Hi, Twiek -- I'm not familiar with installing Ruby in Cygwin, but it looks like you need to turn your attention back there. From this error message, it seems readline isn't installed. Cheers, -- Matthew smime.p7s Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
