Re: [HG] builders' group

2008-10-02 Thread Roy Trotter
, but I'll try harder. Later, Roy - Original Message From: Chris and Bi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: hg@hurdygurdy.com Sent: Tuesday, September 30, 2008 4:52:27 PM Subject: Re: [HG] builders' group Yes, I'd prefer to keep all issues under one roof too. The

Re: [HG] builders' group

2008-09-30 Thread Chris and Bi
Yes, I'd prefer to keep all issues under one roof too. The delete key is never far away... Chris. - Original Message - From: "Leonard Williams" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Hurdy-Gurdy List" Sent: Tuesday, September 30, 2008 10:26 PM Subject: Re: [HG] bui

Re: [HG] builders' group

2008-09-30 Thread Leonard Williams
I'm for keeping it here, for the exact reasons Melissa has voiced. Builder's comments also help with proper maintenance issues. Regards, Leonard Williams _ [: :] / | | \ | | | | (_==_) !~¿ On 9/29/08 1:20 PM, "Melissa Kacalanos" <[EMAIL P

Re: [HG] builders' group

2008-09-29 Thread Simon Wascher
Hello, I would prefer to keep discussions on one list. I would find it a good idea thougt to always use meaningful threads. In case its a builders question it could be common practice to start the thread with "building question" in the acctual case this would make: [HG] building question: sy

Re: [HG] builders' group

2008-09-29 Thread Melissa Kacalanos
While I'm not a builder myself and have no plans to be one, I still find builders' discussions interesting, and enjoy reading them on this list. They help me better appreciate all the work that went into my hg. I'd vote for leaving these discussions here, since then I wouldn't have to check a sepa