I am holding off on pushing to master until I hear otherwise.
On Thu, Apr 7, 2016 at 11:48 AM, Gail Badner wrote:
> +1
>
> On Thu, Apr 7, 2016 at 10:21 AM, andrea boriero
> wrote:
>
>> +1
>> On 7 Apr 2016 17:22, "Vlad Mihalcea"
+1
On Thu, Apr 7, 2016 at 10:21 AM, andrea boriero wrote:
> +1
> On 7 Apr 2016 17:22, "Vlad Mihalcea" wrote:
>
> > +1 too.
> >
> >
> >
> > On Thu, Apr 7, 2016 at 7:03 PM, Chris Cranford
> wrote:
> >
> > > +1 for 5.2
> > >
> > >
+1
On 7 Apr 2016 17:22, "Vlad Mihalcea" wrote:
> +1 too.
>
>
>
> On Thu, Apr 7, 2016 at 7:03 PM, Chris Cranford wrote:
>
> > +1 for 5.2
> >
> > On Thu, Apr 7, 2016 at 10:34 AM, Steve Ebersole
> > wrote:
> >
> > > As a follow up
+1 too.
On Thu, Apr 7, 2016 at 7:03 PM, Chris Cranford wrote:
> +1 for 5.2
>
> On Thu, Apr 7, 2016 at 10:34 AM, Steve Ebersole
> wrote:
>
> > As a follow up to this...
> >
> > Sanne had a great suggestion on HipChat. What about turning all this
>
+1 for 5.2
On Thu, Apr 7, 2016 at 10:34 AM, Steve Ebersole wrote:
> As a follow up to this...
>
> Sanne had a great suggestion on HipChat. What about turning all this work
> (sans SQM, etc) into a 5.2 as an "end of line for 5.0. The idea would be
> 5.2 would include:
>
>
As a follow up to this...
Sanne had a great suggestion on HipChat. What about turning all this work
(sans SQM, etc) into a 5.2 as an "end of line for 5.0. The idea would be
5.2 would include:
1. Move to Java 8
2. Consolidation of hibernate-entitymanager into hibernate-core
3.
Hi,
Until the merge is done, I'll take a break integrating the PRs that are
also relevant to the master branch.
Vlad
On Thu, Apr 7, 2016 at 5:57 PM, Steve Ebersole wrote:
> I agree that would be best. If everyone agrees to stop pushing to master
> for the time being to
I agree that would be best. If everyone agrees to stop pushing to master
for the time being to allow me to finish this consolidation then I can not
rush it as much
On Wed, Apr 6, 2016 at 4:48 PM Chris Cranford wrote:
> I have to concur with Sanne, a hold on master pushes