Another approach I could think of is related to how we would
conceptually implement transaction isolation.
We could create the new index and apply it before the old index. We
could also delete on the fly data from the old index that has been put
in the new index. While the worse case 4x size is st
Fine by me, one of those brilliant flexibility points that did not reach
its public. Let's call it succès d'estime :)
On Thu 2013-07-11 15:04, Sanne Grinovero wrote:
> I'm wondering if this property is really useful. Someone has a
> practical example in which he would need it?
>
> http://docs.jbo
On Thu 2013-07-11 14:37, Hardy Ferentschik wrote:
>
> On 11 Jan 2013, at 12:18 PM, Gunnar Morling wrote:
>
> > Here is the thing, we need to also need to start talking retention setting
> > of the annotation.
> > I think you were suggesting source retention. This means that the
> > annotation
I remember a few discussion where something like that has been
contemplated. One thing that made us not do it AFAIR is that we would
need some kind of shared project to host this across ORM, OGM, SEARCH
etc. In the past we have deemed it not worth it.
Emmanuel
On Wed 2013-07-10 17:48, Gunnar Morl
On Wed 2013-07-10 14:12, Hardy Ferentschik wrote:
>
> > Option A, you rework that logic as part of the spatial feature PR. I am
> > claiming that this is breaking the flow of getting spatial out the doors
> > unnecessarily.
> >
> > Option B, the reviewer comment is converted in a JIRA that can be
On Wed 2013-07-10 11:09, Hardy Ferentschik wrote:
>
> >> What is the definition of not fully on topic. I would not suggest a change
> >> in
> >> class X for a pull request where only class Y and Z are affected. However,
> >> if class X is touched and I see a potential improvement I think it can b
On 9 juil. 2013, at 21:39, Hardy Ferentschik wrote:
>
>> I also think opening issues to things that are not fully on the topic is
>> a good strategy to keep the cycle on a given PR short.
>
> What is the definition of not fully on topic. I would not suggest a change in
> class X for a pull re
curious if y'all are talking about all pull requests, whether that be
>> from community members as well as those from within the team?
>>
>> On Tue 09 Jul 2013 02:39:12 PM CDT, Hardy Ferentschik wrote:
>>> I basically like what I hear. Some wise words :-)
>>&
Some random thoughts
There has been a tendency to let PR sit a bit longer than it should as
we all try to get our stuff done before diving into other's PRs.
I have been particularly guilty and Hibernate OGM is a particularly bad
example. I did not see too much lagging PRs on other projects but I
xternal MongoDB installation,
> >> the
> >>>>> "useExternalMongoDb" property can be specified like this:
> >>>>>
> >>>>> mvn clean install -DuseExternalMongoDb
> >>>>>
> >>>>> This wi
>From what I can see and understand the OGM builds (hibernate-ogm-master
specifically) do not test MongoDB. Is that something expected? Can we
envision adding MongoDB testing?
Emmanuel
___
hibernate-dev mailing list
hibernate-dev@lists.jboss.org
https://
facets is to do this many times (as many times
> as they are defined ranges) as automatically as possible.
>
> Niko
>
> 2013/7/3 Ales Justin :
> > Can you then also easily (aka really fast) know which are those points --
> > even with really big number of data?
>
I'm actually not super impressed, the automation misses doc and we need some
kind
of RSS feed. Also after they stopped binary support, I don't trust them
a lot in this area...
But I'm a grumpy old guy so that might explain.
Emmanuel
On Wed 2013-07-03 18:47, Sanne Grinovero wrote:
> looking good
Gunnar, Davide and I had a discussion on how to get results out of these
soon to be nicely generated native queries in Hibernate OGM
http://transcripts.jboss.org/meeting/irc.freenode.org/hibernate-dev/2013/hibernate-dev.2013-07-03-13.59.html
http://transcripts.jboss.org/meeting/irc.freenode.org/hi
and to strengthen
> the search you want geo facets then you have to compute distance on
> all the 10k results to produce that.
> On the performance PoV this will fail.
>
> Niko
>
>
> 2013/7/3 Emmanuel Bernard :
> > I'm more interested in something like
I have created https://hibernate.atlassian.net/browse/OGM-292 to capture
this.
On Wed 2013-07-03 14:17, Emmanuel Bernard wrote:
> It grew with a similar package structure han ORM but that can be
> revisited. In fact there are many package changes we need to do (api /
> spi / impl split
It grew with a similar package structure han ORM but that can be
revisited. In fact there are many package changes we need to do (api /
spi / impl split etc) but these are not important for now.
On Wed 2013-07-03 11:34, Gunnar Morling wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm wondering about the package structure in
670421
>
>
> I see nothing we cannot do.
>
> Niko
>
> 2013/7/3 Emmanuel Bernard :
> > This morning I was reading
> > http://hashmade.fr/elastic-search-geo-distance-search-with-sorted-and-faceted-results-using-java-native-api/
> > And the code https://github.com/j
This morning I was reading
http://hashmade.fr/elastic-search-geo-distance-search-with-sorted-and-faceted-results-using-java-native-api/
And the code https://github.com/jsebrien/elastic-search-tests
I have to say that we compare quite well in number of lines of code and
readability. Considering t
A few of us discussed the hibernate Search metamodel, its use cases and
how the API should look like as well as FieldBridge and how it could
expose data for optimization and metadata integration.
First meeting 2013-07-01
http://transcripts.jboss.org/meeting/irc.freenode.org/hibernate-dev/2013/hibe
remember the fork of ticketmonster adding Hibernate Search?
https://github.com/jboss-jdf/ticket-monster/tree/hibernate-search
I have added the main todos to make it proper into TicketMonster.
They are all subtasks of https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JDF-57
If you want to take a pick at one to rem
This looks like a good idea and fixes the workaround we had around
optional testing based on profiles.
The only drawback is that we still need to make sure OGM is naturally
usable without it but if we use
https://github.com/joelittlejohn/embedmongo-maven-plugin
it looks like the mongodb instance i
On Thu 2013-06-13 21:33, Hardy Ferentschik wrote:
>
> >> Right, that's what I am also trying to see/find.
> >
> > Sorry, I got confused by your question initially. The query language is not
> > for an
> > end-user, it is for developers or machines.
>
> So why would a developer use it? One point
On Thu 2013-06-13 16:10, Hardy Ferentschik wrote:
>
> On 13 Jan 2013, at 2:11 PM, Gunnar Morling wrote:
>
> > 2013/6/13 Hardy Ferentschik
> >
> > On 13 Jan 2013, at 8:47 AM, Gunnar Morling wrote:
> >
> > > Would creating a "real" query language instead of a serialized object
> > > representa
Is
> this intended to be written by humans or other applications?
>
> --Gunnar
>
>
>
>
> 2013/6/11 Emmanuel Bernard
>
> > Hey everyone,
> >
> > Sanne and I discussed Hibernate Search queries and serialization in
> > general. I did play around
Hey everyone,
Sanne and I discussed Hibernate Search queries and serialization in
general. I did play around that to represent Hibernate Search DSL
queries into JSON.
https://gist.github.com/emmanuelbernard/5760676
It is a very first draft (not reviewed). What is really nice is that I did not
h
On Thu 2013-06-06 11:31, Scott Marlow wrote:
>
> If the static Hibernate Search module, depends on a static Hibernate
> ORM module in WildFly 8, I think that is fine, but applications
> wouldn't be able to include their own Hibernate Search jars (since
> the static Hibernate ORM module only sees s
gt;
> > Next time ping me for any issues, as I've done this ages ago for
> > CapeDwarf. :-)
> >
> > On Jun 6, 2013, at 1:37 PM, Emmanuel Bernard
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Below is an email describing the issues i had to get Hibernate Search
> > run
013 09:49, "Guillaume SCHEIBEL"
> >> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> I'll do better, I'll try with another machine which doesn't know OGM at
> >>> all.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> 2013/6/6 Emmanuel Bernard
> >>
?
Emmanuel
Begin forwarded message:
> From: Pete Muir
> Date: 6 juin 2013 11:21:13 UTC+02:00
> To: Emmanuel Bernard
> Cc: jdf-...@lists.jboss.org
> Subject: Re: [jdf-dev] JBoss Modules dependency vs pain POM dependency +
> exclusions
>
> Hey Emmanuel,
>
> On 5 Jun 20
t all.
>
>
> 2013/6/6 Emmanuel Bernard
>
> > Well make sure to clean your maven repo cache before you test. Or else
> > your local cache will contain the snapshot. Likewise, the remote repo
> > might contain an old snapshot and I dont' think you can guard against
>
comments. You are right, "not a panacea" is what I meant.
> For the "mvn clean install" it worth to be tried, I'll keep you up to date
> on that.
>
> Next step, how to write a new datastore provider.
>
> Guillaume
>
>
> 2013/6/6 Emmanuel Bernard
Nice :)
Do you really mean " OGM definitely is a panacea". From your sentence it
seems you meant " OGM definitely is not a panacea"
> Then just go under %HIBERNATE_OGM_HOME% /hibernate-ogm-modules and
> perform a mvn clean install.
I suspect that won't work since the other maven modules are not
t; >
> > You can clone the Jenkins job and point it at your branch. Not so sure
> > I want this to happen automatically for all my branches.
> >
> > On 06/04/2013 05:36 PM, Gunnar Morling wrote:
> >> If you just want an ad-hoc solution, you could create a cop
With the CI slowly getting in place. Would there be a way to test a
branch of mine without having to push it as a pull-request?
When I push a branch on emmanuelbernard/hibernate-search.git without
creating a PR, it would still be nice to be able to have it run.
Thoughts?
way they do it makes sense but
> it's impressive that the user is fooled into a non-consistent API, and
> it still "feels" like all is consistent.
>
> On 3 June 2013 14:10, Emmanuel Bernard wrote:
> > On Mon 2013-06-03 10:28, Sanne Grinovero wrote:
> >>
On Mon 2013-06-03 10:28, Sanne Grinovero wrote:
> On 3 June 2013 09:59, Hardy Ferentschik wrote:
> >
> > On 31 Jan 2013, at 11:32 PM, Emmanuel Bernard
> > wrote:
> >
> >> I know we had a debate but I can't seem to find any detail in the
> >>
I know we had a debate but I can't seem to find any detail in the
documentation about how facet selection influences the facet counts.
In my demo, the facet count is applied after the selection. ie if I do a
query that returns '< $100' = 20 and '> $100' = 45, once I select '<
$100', the count disp
On Fri 2013-05-31 11:17, Hardy Ferentschik wrote:
>
> On 31 Jan 2013, at 11:13 AM, Hardy Ferentschik wrote:
>
> >>Set getIndexNames();
> >>
> >> Would something like Set getIndexes() make sense?
> >
> > That's an interesting thought. In fact I was wondering whether more index
> > spec
On Thu 2013-05-30 14:51, Hardy Ferentschik wrote:
> >> Things we wanted but where too hard to do so far:
> >> - Separate annotation reading from Document building. Separate
> >> validity checks too.
> >> - It checks for JPA @Id using reflection as it might not be available
> >> -> pluggable?
> >
>
On Wed 2013-05-29 17:39, Sanne Grinovero wrote:
> We're starting a series of refactorings in Hibernate Search to improve
> how we handle the entity mapping to the index; to summarize goals:
>
> 1# Expose the Metadata as API
>
> We need to expose it because:
> a - OGM needs to be able to read thi
A proposal to get Facet.getValue more usable.
https://hibernate.atlassian.net/browse/HSEARCH-1343
On Wed 2013-05-29 14:33, Emmanuel Bernard wrote:
> Actually a List might make sense if the order you define faceting is the
> order you want to expose it. But that's a tiny bit far fetc
t; }
>
> Either way it should probably be a set.
>
> --Hardy
>
> On 29 Jan 2013, at 1:10 PM, Emmanuel Bernard wrote:
>
> > Trying to write a slightly generic code listing the facets and exposing
> > them in a UI. I cannot find a way to list the faceting requests
Trying to write a slightly generic code listing the facets and exposing
them in a UI. I cannot find a way to list the faceting requests applied.
Am I missing something? What do you think of adding
interface FacetingManager {
List getFacetingNames();
...
}
I'd love a less
Get rid of it. I forgot about that actually.
It is still an interesting idea to lower the barrier to people adding data
source integration with Hibernate Search but if it requires a complete rewrite,
better remove this experiment.
On 28 mai 2013, at 13:38, Sanne Grinovero wrote:
> On 19 May
Hello everyone,
Since Hibernate OGM is back with Davide and Gunnar working actively on it, I
put in the wiki a roadmap for Hibernate OGM with things we or or less formally
discussed in the past.
https://community.jboss.org/wiki/HibernateOGMRoadmap
That's (always) a draft and we can discuss pri
ts Java6 for users.
> > On 17 May 2013 10:26, "Emmanuel Bernard" wrote:
> >
> > > I tried to get ORM imported in IntelliJ IDEA and it fails with a
> > > Unsupported major.minor version 51.0. In Mac OS IntelliJ boots with JDK
> > > 1.6 AFAIK and it se
I tried to get ORM imported in IntelliJ IDEA and it fails with a
Unsupported major.minor version 51.0. In Mac OS IntelliJ boots with JDK
1.6 AFAIK and it seems the tools (like gradle) inherit this.
Any of the Mac guys found an acceptable solution to import the Gradle
project in IntelliJ?
>From wh
Hello guys,
I have a question I should have asked years ago. I don't understand the
difference between the Hibernate ORM Manual and the Hibernate ORM
Developer Guide. What is the fundamental difference?
Emmanuel
___
hibernate-dev mailing list
hibernate-
Nice :)
On 16 mai 2013, at 01:01, Sanne Grinovero wrote:
> Dear All,
> since Nicolas didn't "just" contribute an awesome new feature for
> Hibernate Search but is also actively maintaining it, I've added him
> to the Hibernate Search committers team.
>
> I find myself asking for his opinion on
Hello Davide,
Technically most of the knowledge is in
https://hibernate.atlassian.net/browse/OGM-208 but it's definitely quite
blurry for a new comer ;)
Let me try and summarize it for you. With that you'll be able to better
grasp the comments in OGM-208
## Goals
We want a metadata facility as
I did not think of that but an "implicit" or "auto" setting makes some
sense.
Just to be sure, the new immplicit setting / behavior will break the
semantic of what's going on so it should at least but a minor version
bump. Correct?
BTW, did you guys even found out why using sync was taking so much
But we can definitely have a wiki page or even better a table in the
documentation for third party dialects and where they are hosted.
That' cheap for us and keep the ecosystem thriving.
Emmanuel
On Fri 2013-05-03 17:17, Strong Liu wrote:
> I think the main reason is the lack of dev resource, if
e had trouble with
> > it on windows.
> > On 2 May 2013 23:41, "Guillaume SCHEIBEL"
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Hi Emmanuel,
> > >
> > > Sorry I can't reproduce it and both maven & intellij plugins are telling
> > me
> > > the Label
Taking OGM master, I get a checkstyle failure on one of the test file.
But what is surprising is that I don't see new lines at the end of the
described file.
Can you guys reproduce?
Emmanuel
[INFO] --- maven-resources-plugin:2.5:resources (default-resources) @
hibernate-ogm-core ---
[debug] exec
I am not certain everyone follows all pull request notifications so that might
explain the lack. At least in the "NoORM" subteam (search, OGM, Validator) we
should handle pull requests for all of these projects even if its not "our"
project du jour.
On 1 mai 2013, at 19:49, Gunnar Morling wro
Hiding behind a long and deep email won't hide the fact that you have not
answered my question :)
More inline.
On Thu 2013-04-11 17:47, Sanne Grinovero wrote:
> Man your simple question is actually super complex.
>
> Conclusion first: I think it's important we can always identify any
> index jus
I am currently working on a solution for dynamically adding new shards
to Hibernate Search (for example one per tenant with a list growing).
https://hibernate.atlassian.net/browse/HSEARCH-472
Things are going well but there is an interesting problem related to a
subsequent feature
https://hibern
ing more of EntityManager.createNativeQuery but
Session.createSQLQuery is semantically the same. SQLQuery might have many
unimplemented methods and if that's really too problematic, we can imagine a
dedicated method but I'd like to avoid that.
>
> On Wed, Apr 10, 2013 at 6:31 PM, Emmanu
to the DBCursor except that it returns an
> > Object of the type entityType.
> >
> > I'm using the same approach used for the OgmMassIndexer therefore the
> > return type must be en entity.
> >
> > Do you think something like this can be useful?
> >
>From what I understand, this would be equivalent to the
@NAtiveNamedQuery support in JPA where you define the binding between
the result set and the objects. We can give it a shot. I wonder how much
of this is related to the JP-QL query mechanism though and should be
shared.
Emmanuel
On Sun 2013
On 3 avr. 2013, at 21:14, Hardy Ferentschik wrote:
>
> On 3 Apr 2013, at 20:34, Sanne Grinovero wrote:
>
>> Thinking about the domain name, would you prefer
>> - hibernate-ci
>> - ci.hibernate.org
>
> +1 for ci.hibernate.org. I also like that it not reflect Jenkins in its name.
I like it t
On 3 avr. 2013, at 18:11, Hardy Ferentschik wrote:
> Or why not just rename the packages to _private ;-) (only over my dead body
> btw)
That's why I did fight the fight. I feared for your life ;)
___
hibernate-dev mailing list
hibernate-dev@lists.jbo
I did not know that JBoss AS modules let you define a glob of excluded
(private) packages. Not sure if we use that in our HSearch (and other)
modules, but we should :)
Emmanuel
___
hibernate-dev mailing list
hibernate-dev@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jb
On Wed 2013-04-03 16:06, Hardy Ferentschik wrote:
>
> On 3 Jan 2013, at 3:55 PM, Emmanuel Bernard wrote:
>
> > On Wed 2013-04-03 15:46, Hardy Ferentschik wrote:
> >>
> >> On 3 Jan 2013, at 2:10 PM, Emmanuel Bernard wrote:
> >>
> >>> If
On Wed 2013-04-03 15:46, Hardy Ferentschik wrote:
>
> On 3 Jan 2013, at 2:10 PM, Emmanuel Bernard wrote:
>
> > If you work on Hibernate Search, here is a heads up. Make sure to either run
> >
> >mvn clean install -s settings-example.xml
> >
> > or a
name, but in terms of consistency I noticed only the
> java projects (jars we distribute) have such a prefix.
> Websites and other infrastructure does not (in.relation.to awestruct)
> You want to rename that too?
>
>
> On 3 April 2013 13:16, Emmanuel Bernard wrote:
>
> &g
Thanks guys, nice tough on the OAuth - GitHub integration.
I have a proposal: can we rename the Git repo hosting the configuration
to hibernate-continuous-integration or hibernate-ci?
I'm specifically asking because GitHub is not quite consistent in
whether or not it shows the organization it com
If you work on Hibernate Search, here is a heads up. Make sure to either run
mvn clean install -s settings-example.xml
or add in your settings.xml the profile and associated repository
redhat-earlyaccess-repository
and add it to the list of active profiles. settings-example.xml will
show you
AFAIR, the test is a case Linda and the JPA EG wanted covered.
On Tue 2013-04-02 11:49, Hardy Ferentschik wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I think the code is wrong. The test setup seems correct. The spec does not
> really rule this case out.
> I did not think about this case when writing the code below.
>
>
lve named things.
>
> At least that is how I read the code.
>
>
> On 03/18/2013 10:40 AM, Steve Ebersole wrote:
> >On Mon 18 Mar 2013 09:10:40 AM CDT, Emmanuel Bernard wrote:
> >>
> >>That was the point of the Scanning API in the first place: not to depend
>
Galder's work could very well be an interesting solution where we use
IdentityMap.
I know ORM has be using it less with the bytecode rework but I think we
still use it in particular in Hibernate Validator.
___
hibernate-dev mailing list
hibernate-dev@lis
On Mon 2013-03-18 8:15, Steve Ebersole wrote:
> On Mon 18 Mar 2013 05:14:01 AM CDT, Emmanuel Bernard wrote:
> >
> >JBoss AS does use this contract so if you break it, we will need some
> >kind of compatibility matrix between Hibernate and JBoss AS and EAP.
> >Not unsurm
JBoss AS does use this contract so if you break it, we will need some
kind of compatibility matrix between Hibernate and JBoss AS and EAP.
Not unsurmountable but always a small annoyance.
Maybe other environments also make use of this interface but I am not
aware of them.
I'm surprised getUnqualif
bjects in the
> list is not IndexedLabel.
>
> If I first get the list of news and than for each of them I called the
> method news.getLabels(), everything works fine.
>
> Any thoughts
>
> Thanks
>
> On Thu, Mar 7, 2013 at 10:15 AM, Emmanuel Bernard
> wrote:
&
I have no more coin for this one so I have dumped what I have so far
https://github.com/hibernate/hibernate-ogm/pull/175
Emmanuel
On Wed 2013-03-06 19:18, Emmanuel Bernard wrote:
> I've successfully implemented OGM-151 for EntityKey which is the one we
> need to move OGM-273 forward f
could
introduce AssociationKeyMetadata but build it on-demand - that one is
easier to achieve.
Emmanuel
On Wed 2013-03-06 15:32, Davide D'Alto wrote:
> it's ok for me
>
> Davide
>
> On Wed, Mar 6, 2013 at 3:28 PM, Emmanuel Bernard
> wrote:
> > I'm planning on
27;s why I
> was interested in the fetch profiles and graph loading in JPA 2.1
>
> On 5 March 2013 17:44, Emmanuel Bernard wrote:
> > I have implemented a solution that gives an entity based on a tuple.
> > https://hibernate.onjira.com/browse/OGM-273#comment-50082
> >
> >
that will work for associations. I
suspect some nasty n+1 is happening as best. Worse case, an exception :)
Emmanuel
On Tue 2013-03-05 10:30, Emmanuel Bernard wrote:
> We might hope for a stable enough contract on Hibernate Search and
> hope that we won't break serializability betwee
a lot of config and Infinispan machinery I'm not sure is here
> > today
> > :)
> > ah
> > I don't care how it's called, it's one of those patterns
> > that make the code harder to follow
> > I was actually trying to remember the name of the
On 4 mars 2013, at 17:39, Sanne Grinovero wrote:
> On 4 March 2013 16:20, Emmanuel Bernard wrote:
>> I already gave what I knew on how to load an entity from a tuple (which
>> isn't much) but we can try and dig together. Something I thought about
>> is that ORM p
erence I guess, but while developing major features I
> >>find it easier to keep track of my ongoing work that way
> >>
> >>On Mar 4, 2013 7:02 AM, "Emmanuel Bernard" >><mailto:emman...@hibernate.org>> wrote:
> >>
> >>nice, I
n but
> to implement
> a new one, which shares the same last phase (consumption of Lucene Documents
> from multithreaded producers); this would be an extremely trivial one-phase
> processor invoking the DocumentBuilder, provided we have some way to have
> the GridDialect expose (to avoid &qu
> whenever possible.
>
>
> On Mon 04 Mar 2013 07:53:34 AM CST, Emmanuel Bernard wrote:
> >I don't follow you. It seems to make sense to me to have ddl and
> >callback.
> >
> >It says validate entities on CRUD events, apply database generation in
>
IMHO not much sense at all.
>
> So IMO we ought to be deprecating the ability to have multiple
> selections here.
>
>
> On Mon 04 Mar 2013 07:21:26 AM CST, Emmanuel Bernard wrote:
> >Our impl allow multiple choices to be able to add ddl as an additional
> >behavior as it
Our impl allow multiple choices to be able to add ddl as an additional
behavior as it (was) not defined in the spec.
And indeed, auto uses the degraded mode and callback forced BV to be
used and raise an exception if it is not present. I can see apps deciding
for one or the other.
Emmanuel
On Fr
Do you have an alternative in mind?
My understanding is that if you write a Neo4J JtaPlatform, then the
transaction will be started:
- if the transaction is manually started by the wrapping code
- if someone uses Session.beginTransaction() or
EntityManager.getTransaction().begin()
You wanted t
Irrespective of this discussion, a single salt value for all you entries
is discouraged. It's better to have one salt value per entry. Some
algorithms even embed the salt in the encrypted value itself so that
everything is stored in a single column.
In an ideal world, you would keep the salts in a
nice, I'll have a look. If I can squeeze a bit of OGM friendliness to
the redesign, that would be a nice bonus.
By the way, any reason to create a dedicated repo instead of a branch?
I mistakenly imported your repo in my orm repo ;)
Emmanuel
On Mon 2013-02-25 13:19, Steve Ebersole wrote:
> I bel
JPA 2.1 users cannot portably use JDK 6 but if we can we could try and
support it in our implementations. Best effort.
On Mon 2013-02-25 19:17, Gunnar Morling wrote:
> > 1) JPA 2.1 is part of EE 7 which requires SE 7
>
> But couldn't JPA 2.1 be used in 1.6 SE environments? I guess there'd be
> us
The mass indexer does not work at the resultset level so mixing tuples
and mass indexer seems wrong to me.
Have you considered something like
Iterator getAllTuplesFrom(String... tableNames);
And then expose an Iterator (ie entities) to the mass indexer?
I mean we could make it work with your
I don't think you are right Gail. You can use secondary tables even if no
association are involved. We happen to use the secondary table mechanism to map
one to one + join table but that's an implementation detail of Hibernate ORM.
On 1 mars 2013, at 20:49, Gail Badner wrote:
> Actually, ther
I like the changelog file too for a few reasons :
- URLs do change. Say the URL to point to the changelog generation evolves in
JIRA.
- scrolling and CTRL+F is pretty good to find the info you are looking for.
- I like self contained releases
It is a manual step but we might be able to automati
It's better to use the user forums but here are a few hints.
Depending on the collection type, Hibernate can delete the precise rows
that it needs to. In other cases it has to clean all rows and recreate
them.
It seems you are using a collection that is neither a Set nor an indexed
collection (Li
Hibernate Search 4.2 is out with some cool new features like spatial
queries and the ability to smoothly index files like Word documents, MP3
metadata, PDFs etc.
Read more at http://goo.gl/57vs1
Emmanuel
___
hibernate-dev mailing list
hibernate-dev@list
Good idea. Done.
On Mon 2013-01-07 11:37, Sanne Grinovero wrote:
> Thanks! indeed.
> If you wish to add the credentials to the private wiki having all
> other accounts, we can avoid asking your time for such non-interesting
> tasks ;)
>
> Sanne
>
> On 7 January 2013
AFAIK, it's back to normal.
On 4 janv. 2013, at 10:28, Emmanuel Bernard wrote:
> GitHub fixed the HTTP 500 error for OAuth but the test hook still seem
> to fail. I've followed up with them.
>
> Emmanuel
>
> On Thu 2013-01-03 15:00, Emmanuel Bernard wrote:
>&
GitHub fixed the HTTP 500 error for OAuth but the test hook still seem
to fail. I've followed up with them.
Emmanuel
On Thu 2013-01-03 15:00, Emmanuel Bernard wrote:
> I have done some tests and you are correct. The token / secret seems
> legit though. I tried to renew them but got
On Thu 2013-01-03 18:19, Ales Justin wrote:
> I think anything handled by not-Lucene is wrong.
> >>>
> >>> I'm afraid Lucene won't do it, so we have no option. It's definitely
> >>> not designed to do this: even a custom Collector can't return more
> >>> results than Documents in its segment,
On Thu 2013-01-03 17:59, Ales Justin wrote:
> >> I think anything handled by not-Lucene is wrong.
> >
> > I'm afraid Lucene won't do it, so we have no option. It's definitely
> > not designed to do this: even a custom Collector can't return more
> > results than Documents in its segment, as all re
501 - 600 of 1843 matches
Mail list logo
