On 19 Jan 2013, at 18:17, Sanne Grinovero wrote:
> On 19 December 2013 15:19, Hardy Ferentschik wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> IMO we should rethink how we describe the architecture of Search and
>> especially its extension points.
>> I think for Search 5 we will need to review/rewrite the documentation
On 19 December 2013 15:19, Hardy Ferentschik wrote:
> Hi,
>
> IMO we should rethink how we describe the architecture of Search and
> especially its extension points.
> I think for Search 5 we will need to review/rewrite the documentation (maybe
> as part of moving to asciidoc) and clear out some
Hi,
IMO we should rethink how we describe the architecture of Search and especially
its extension points.
I think for Search 5 we will need to review/rewrite the documentation (maybe as
part of moving to asciidoc) and clear out some
of the ambiguities we have in the used terminology.
For exam
