Sorry, I have no idea how that is related to this subject. Maybe I am
missing something?
On Fri, Jun 16, 2017 at 9:45 AM Jordan Gigov wrote:
> Would this allow for queries of multiple keys, like this?
>
> SELECT * FROM tbl WHERE (key1, key2) IN ( (val1k1,val1k2),
> (val2k1,val2k2)... )
>
> I s
Would this allow for queries of multiple keys, like this?
SELECT * FROM tbl WHERE (key1, key2) IN ( (val1k1,val1k2), (val2k1,val2k2)... )
I started working on trying to fit something like this in 5.2 and see
what problems I would encounter, but haven't had time to finish it.
On 16 June 2017 at 1
No feedback, so I will work in this direction then...
On Thu, May 18, 2017 at 10:23 AM Steve Ebersole wrote:
> As part of removing most Type sub-types we are left with the question of
> how to handle the role served by CollectionType. Andrea and I came up with
> a proposal that not only serves
As part of removing most Type sub-types we are left with the question of
how to handle the role served by CollectionType. Andrea and I came up with
a proposal that not only serves that purpose but also allows a level of
customization we have so far not supported but which has been asked for a
few
