Since this is gaining some traction, I think we need to start deciding:
1. whether to have Byte Buddy *replace* Javassist, or to have it as an
alternative impl
2. IIUC some of our issues could be alleviated by generating a Javassist
shaded jar. Should we consider that for Byte Buddy o
As I have said quite often I would love to have a ByteBuddy
BytecodeProvider or possibly switch from Javassist to ByteBuddy. The issue
is resources. I don't have the time right now.
For what it is worth, Chiba does have the changes in place to support Java
9 in Javassist. That is actually not th
Hi Steve,
Since we have issues with Javassist and Java 1.9, maybe it's the right time
to consider switching to ByteBuddy.
Vlad
On Sat, Oct 1, 2016 at 6:22 PM, Rafael Winterhalter
wrote:
> Hello everybody,
>
> I was wondering how big the chances are to get a Byte Buddy bytecode
> provider into
Hello everybody,
I was wondering how big the chances are to get a Byte Buddy bytecode
provider into Hibernate? Byte Buddy has matured a lot over the last two
years and it aims a lot on performance what is something Hibernate could
benefit of. There are comparion charts posted on the Byte Buddy web
