Re: [hibernate-dev] Should we support out of date non-LTS Java versions?

2019-02-20 Thread Sanne Grinovero
Looks like we all agree on these guidelines, and since a week is passed I assume everyone else is fine too :) and thanks Yoann for updating the compatibility notes on the website! One first consequence is that the JDK9 and JDK10 jobs on CI are being abandoned; apparently they already aren't run

Re: [hibernate-dev] Should we support out of date non-LTS Java versions?

2019-02-13 Thread Steve Ebersole
+1 to everything Yoann said. On Wed, Feb 13, 2019, 5:42 AM Yoann Rodiere wrote: > Hi, > > I think we should make it clear that only LTS JVMs are actually supported, > and non-LTS JVMs are only supported on a "best effort" basis, with some > focus on the very latest non-LTS JVM. > I doubt we

Re: [hibernate-dev] Should we support out of date non-LTS Java versions?

2019-02-13 Thread Yoann Rodiere
Hi, I think we should make it clear that only LTS JVMs are actually supported, and non-LTS JVMs are only supported on a "best effort" basis, with some focus on the very latest non-LTS JVM. I doubt we have the appropriate resources to do anything more than that. To be more specific, I would see

[hibernate-dev] Should we support out of date non-LTS Java versions?

2019-02-12 Thread Sanne Grinovero
Hi all, I just tested if we still need the dependency to 'javax.activation:javax.activation-api:1.2.0' from Hibernate ORM / master, as I was suspecting the original reasons to add it might be out of date. I guessed almost right, as it turns out we don't need this dependency for Java 11, nor it