On Wed, 23 Nov 2011 17:15:50 +0100, David M. Lloyd
wrote:
> The solution is really easy guys:
>
> log.debugf("The thing I want to log is %s", thing);
> or
> log.debug(thing)
>
> In addition, as you have noticed, it is better to not use the formatting
> variants if you aren't actually formatti
The solution is really easy guys:
log.debugf("The thing I want to log is %s", thing);
or
log.debug(thing)
In addition, as you have noticed, it is better to not use the formatting
variants if you aren't actually formatting any strings (it doesn't make
a difference if the message isn't logged, bu
Hi,
this revives my email from Friday
(http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/hibernate-dev/2011-November/007307.html)
where I noticed this problem as well.
Generally speaking Sanne is of course right and the right logging method
should be used,
but does the logging framework really have to propaga
On Nov 23, 2011, at 11:34 , Sanne Grinovero wrote:
> log.debugf vs log.debug
> log.tracef vs log.trace
This also seems to be the difference between these messages with JUL:
[main] TRACE - 11:27:51,428 - org.hibernate.loader.Loader:
org.hibernate.internal.CoreMessageLog
Hi all,
I'm having a chat with Hardy about how we used the Logger in some
cases, and it turns out there's some confusion about
log.debugf vs log.debug
log.tracef vs log.trace
So the "F" variant is needed when we want to format a message, in this
case we should make sure the number o
