> Let me know what you decide about HHH-4358.
>
> Thanks,
> Gail
>
> - Original Message -
>> From: "Steve Ebersole"
>> To: "Gail Badner"
>> Cc: "Hibernate"
>> Sent: Thursday, January 19, 2012 6:09:47 PM
>> Sub
> Adam, are there any Envers issues that should be backported for 3.6.10? If
> so, please create new issues for them and assign as appropriate.
Nope, nothing that I'm aware of. We've been adding some new features only.
--
Adam Warski
http://twitter.com/#!/adamwarski
http://www.softwaremill.c
: "Gail Badner"
> Cc: "Hibernate"
> Sent: Thursday, January 19, 2012 6:09:47 PM
> Subject: Re: [hibernate-dev] Backports for 3.6.10
>
> Actually it is not fixed yet :) Let me think about it.
>
> On Thu 19 Jan 2012 08:08:56 PM CST, Steve Ebersole wrote:
> &
I think HHH-6855 should be. HHH-6854 is just a test fix, I'd say its
not important for backport.
I don't think there is actually any code changes for HHH-4358. I may
have left that fix version there by mistake.
On Thu 19 Jan 2012 04:05:46 PM CST, Gail Badner wrote:
> I've created new issues f
Actually it is not fixed yet :) Let me think about it.
On Thu 19 Jan 2012 08:08:56 PM CST, Steve Ebersole wrote:
> I think HHH-6855 should be. HHH-6854 is just a test fix, I'd say its
> not important for backport.
>
> I don't think there is actually any code changes for HHH-4358. I may
> have l
